source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A46957-2003Jun11.htmlA key component of President Bush's claim in his State of the Union address last January that Iraq had an active nuclear weapons program -- its alleged attempt to buy uranium in Niger -- was disputed by a CIA-directed mission to the central African nation in early 2002, according to senior administration officials and a former government official. But the CIA did not pass on the detailed results of its investigation to the White House or other government agencies, the officials said
...
Armed with information purportedly showing that Iraqi officials had been seeking to buy uranium in Niger one or two years earlier, the CIA in early February 2002 dispatched a retired U.S. ambassador to the country to investigate the claims, according to the senior U.S. officials and the former government official, who is familiar with the event. The sources spoke on condition of anonymity and on condition that the name of the former ambassador not be disclosed.
During his trip, the CIA's envoy spoke with the president of Niger and other Niger officials mentioned as being involved in the Iraqi effort, some of whose signatures purportedly appeared on the documents.
After returning to the United States, the envoy reported to the CIA that the uranium-purchase story was false, the sources said. Among the envoy's conclusions was that the documents may have been forged because the "dates were wrong and the names were wrong," the former U.S. government official said.
However, the CIA did not include details of the former ambassador's report and his identity as the source, which would have added to the credibility of his findings, in its intelligence reports that were shared with other government agencies.
soorce: http://www.tompaine.com/feature2.cfm/ID/8069.June 10, 2003
The Honorable Condoleezza Rice
Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs
The White House
Washington, DC 20500
Dear Dr. Rice:
Since March 17, 2003, I have been trying without success to get a direct answer to one simple question: Why did President Bush cite forged evidence about Iraq's nuclear capabilities in his State of the Union address?
Although you addressed this issue on Sunday on both Meet the Press and This Week with George Stephanopoulos, your comments did nothing to clarify this issue. In fact, your responses contradicted other known facts and raised a host of new questions.
During your interviews, you said the Bush Administration welcomes inquiries into this matter. Yesterday, The Washington Post also reported that Director of Central Intelligence George Tenet has agreed to provide "full documentation" of the intelligence information "in regards to Secretary Powell's comments, the president's comments and anybody else's comments." Consistent with these sentiments, I am writing to seek further information about this important matter.
source: http://www.wsws.org/articles/2003/jun2003/iraq-j12.shtmlThe story of the bioweapons trailers follows a familiar pattern. Ever since the fall of Baghdad, the US occupation forces have repeatedly announced the discovery of "smoking guns" proving the existence of the alleged Iraqi WMDs, only to end up retracting the claims after a cursory investigation.
On April 7, the Pentagon announced that the 101st Airborne had discovered a major cache of missiles fitted with chemical warheads outside of Baghdad. It was also reported that buried "bioweapons labs" had been unearthed.
A week later, on April 13, the Washington Post disclosed that the chemical weapons found by the 101st were in reality a pesticide, probably used to control Iraq's mosquito population. The Pentagon, meanwhile, backed off from its original announcement concerning the missiles, telling the newspaper it "denies any knowledge of this alleged discovery." Two days later CNN revealed that the "bioweapons labs" had proven to be nothing more than unopened crates of standard laboratory equipment, such as test tubes.
Similarly, an announcement that troops had discovered 55-gallon drums filled with a "blister agent" was followed by a correction--the substance was actually rocket fuel. Last month, the Washington Post reported that US military teams searching for weapons pursued one of their hottest leads, breaking into a locked storeroom inside the headquarters of Iraq's "Special Security Organization Al Hayat," only to find vacuum cleaners.
These farcical episodes, capped by the exposure of the trailers fraud, underscore the fact that the US government plotted and carried out a war of aggression that it justified to the American public and the world through a systematic campaign of lies.
source: http://www.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=326335&group=webcastMajor Iraqi Uprising Looming In Near Future
6/13/03
By: Jay Shaft--- Coalition For Free Thought In Media
At least 42 U.S. troops have now been killed by assailants since Baghdad fell to American forces on April 9. In the last few weeks the attacks on coalition forces have increased to the point where a soldier being killed is an almost everyday occurrence.
Just yesterday 6/12, and today 6/13, the US killed over 100 resisters in heavy fighting. This is enraging the Iraqi people to new levels. Massive demonstrations and attacks are breaking out all over Iraq today in reaction.
On Sunday 6/8 a US soldier was shot to death at a checkpoint near the Syrian border by a man requesting medical help. "One paratrooper from the 82nd Airborne Division's 2nd Brigade Combat Team was killed and a second injured Tuesday afternoon in a rocket-propelled grenade attack while operating a weapons collection point in southwest Baghdad," Central Command said in a press release.
source: http://www.wsws.org/articles/2003/jun2003/loot-j14.shtmlDespite the devastating losses that have been suffered and the continued looting, however, certain journalists have made it their business to assert that the extent of the problem has been exaggerated and even to claim that Iraqi archaeologists are responsible for stealing whatever is missing. This campaign of denial and disinformation can only compound the damage already done to Iraq's cultural heritage. Not only will it distract from the task of tracking down the artefacts that are flooding onto the antiquities market, but it is also being used to discredit Iraqi archaeologists and to take control of the country's history out of their hands.
The BBC is leading the way in this scurrilous campaign. In a prime-time documentary screened June 9, art and architectural historian Dan Cruikshank made a number of unsubstantiated claims. He suggested that the Baghdad Museum was a legitimate military target, that the looting was "an inside job" and that the staff were unsuitable to be left in charge of Iraq's cultural heritage because they had been members of the Ba?ath Party.
Cruickshank's claims were immediately taken up by Guardian correspondent David Aaronovitch, who declared that the staff of the Baghdad Museum were "apparatchiks of a fascist regime". He poured scorn on the world's journalists and academics for believing the stories about looting.
source: http://www.islam-online.net/English/News/2003-06/14/article01.shtmlHossam al-Sayed, IOL Chief Correspondent
RAWAH, Iraq , June 14 (IslamOnline.net) - American troops "slaughtered" more than one hundred Iraqi civilians, most of them killed while asleep, at the early hours of Friday, June 13, eyewitnesses told IslamOnline.net.
The U.S. forces deliberately opened fire from tanks and helicopter gunships at the houses of Iraqi civilians in Rawah, 400 kilometer to the north-west of Baghdad, killing tens of people, they charged.
The town residents rushed out of their homes which came under heavy American bombardment.
Some of them emerged with their light arms and battled the occupation forces, killing and injuring an unspecified number of American troops, eyewitnesses told IOL correspondent.
"The bodies of 12 of your boys were found tied with ropes, each with a bullet in the head. The Americans detained them and immediately executed them in this horrible way," charged Abu Saadoun, one of the town tribal leaders.
"Now we have to avenge not only the occupation of our country but also the slaughtering of our boys. We will open the gates of hell on the Americans," he pledged in exclusive statements to IOL.
Tired and exhausted Abu Khaled told IOL he spent three hours in the desert at the outskirts of Rawah digging a mass grave for the victims of the American massacre.
"We buried more than 80 of our sons but are still puzzled what pushed the Americans to massacre our people. We are far away from Baghdad and no fighting has been reported here.
"Such weapons require substantial industrial plant and a large workforce. It is inconceivable that both could have been kept concealed for the two months we have been in occupation of Iraq.
I have never ruled out the possibility that we may unearth some old stock of biological toxins or chemical agents and it is possible that we may yet find some battlefield shells.
Nevertheless, this would not constitute weapons of mass destruction and would not justify the claim before the war that Iraq posed what the prime minister described as a 'current and serious threat'."
"I fear the fundamental problem is that instead of using intelligence as evidence on which to base a decision about policy, we used intelligence as the basis on which to justify a policy on which we had already settled."
I believe that the Prime Minister must have concluded that it was honourable and desirable to back the US in going for military action in Iraq and therefore it was honourable for him to persuade us through various ruses and ways to get us there – so for him I think it was an honourable deception."
"I think that is where the falsity lies.....The exaggeration of immediacy means you cannot do things properly and action has to be immediate.
I still don't think he (Saddam) was an immediate threat."
New evidence emerged this month of the widespread use by US and British forces of deadly cluster bombs in densely populated areas of Iraq. On June 1, the London-based Observer newspaper published a map produced by the US/UK military-run Humanitarian Operations Center (HOC), based in Kuwait, showing the location of unexploded bombs and land mines throughout the devastated country.
source: http://www.wsws.org/articles/2003/jun2003/clus-j17.shtmlIn the days leading up to the US-British invasion, numerous human rights groups appealed to the American and British governments to refrain from the use of cluster bombs entirely, or at least in populated areas. The appeals were ignored, leaving the Iraqi people to suffer the consequences for years to come.
Lynch's unit, the 507th Maintenance Company, was ambushed outside Nasiriyah after taking several wrong turns. Army investigators believe this happened in part because superiors never passed on word that the long 3rd Infantry Division column that the convoy was following had been rerouted. At times, the 507th was 12 hours behind the main column and frequently out of radio contact.
Lynch was riding in a Humvee when it plowed into a jackknifed U.S. truck. She suffered major injuries, including multiple fractures and compression to her spine, that knocked her unconscious, military sources said. The collision killed or gravely injured the Humvee's four other passengers.
source: http://www.wsws.org/articles/2003/jun2003/iraq-j18.shtml"You can't tell friend from foe," complained a US soldier, according to a wire service report. "We didn't want nothing to do with these people anymore," an Army Sergeant told the New York Times. He added that even children terrified him. "At the end, it was like, 'Get that kid away from me,'" he said.
These remarks are eerily reminiscent of those made by an earlier generation of American troops who were sent on the basis of lies to kill and be killed in a distant land--Vietnam. Fearing the population that they were supposedly protecting from "communist aggression," they found it impossible to distinguish Vietnamese civilians from the Viet Cong--largely because the Viet Cong and the North Vietnamese were waging a popular war against a hated and despised army of occupation.
As one US Marine Sergeant testified in hearings held in May 1971: "The way that we distinguished between civilians and VC, VC had weapons and civilians didn't and anybody that was dead was considered a VC. If you killed someone they said, 'How do you know hes a VC?' and the general reply would be, 'He's dead,' and that was sufficient."