Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

*IRAQ: latest news and developments

errrrr, and what rules would that be, give up your country and we'll see whether you'll stay alive!!!!!!
 
Yes they really should come out to the desert with their inferior numbers and firepower so that they can get a good hiding out in the open.:rolleyes:

"Clearly for the "Allies", the only morally acceptable strategy the Iraqi army can pursue is to march out into the desert and be bombed by B-52s or be mowed down by machine-gun fire. Anything short of that is cheating. "

From this article in todays Guardian.
 
Liberated Iraqi's have to pay for coalition water

Yeah, I heard they were thinking of this yesterday. They wouldn't let the drivers go becasue they couldn't decide whether to pay them a small fee for delivering the water or get the locals to pay. What a surprising decision they came to...
 
Iraq has kicked Al Jazeera out. Officially, they are just suspending broadcasts from Iraq - BBC

WTF are they doing? Ideas anyone?
 
Hail of Cluster Bombs Leaves a Trail of Death
Robert Fisk, The Independent

BABYLON, 3 April 2003 — The wounds are vicious and deep, a rash of scarlet spots on the back and thighs or face, the shards of shrapnel from the cluster bombs buried an inch or more in the flesh. The wards of the Hilla teaching hospital are proof that something illegal — something quite outside the Geneva Conventions — occurred in the villages around the city once known as Babylon.



Al Jazeera: off BBC 2202:
Al-Jazeera halts Iraq broadcasts


The station has shown Saddam Hussein speeches
The Arabic news channel al-Jazeera says it is suspending its reports from Iraq in protest after Baghdad banned two of its correspondents from working there.
The station said the Iraqi Information Ministry had barred Diyar al-Omari - an Iraqi - from reporting, and ordered correspondent Tayseer Alouni to leave the country.

The channel's editor-in-chief, Ibrahim Helal, told the BBC that the Iraqis had given no reasons for their action, which he called sudden and unjustified

Al-Jazeera says it will continue to transmit images from its offices in Baghdad, Basra and Mosul.

The station interrupted a regular broadcast to make its announcement.

They cannot dictate to us who can and cannot work

Editor-in-chief
Ibrahim Helal


Channel in the news
Its eight correspondents will remain in Iraq until the Iraqis clarify their decision, Mr Helal said, adding that it was not the first time the Iraqi authorities had tried to ban its journalists.

"We faced lots of things like that before from the Iraqi Government and from other governments in the Arab region, because this is a way they think," Mr Helal told the BBC.

"They think the can impose some conditions on al-Jazeera or they think they can change the reporters, they can put their own criteria on our work."

The Qatar-based satellite broadcaster is one of the most influential voices in the Arab world. It says it has 35 million viewers.

The US and UK have accused the station of bias and criticised it for airing pictures of dead Western troops.

Al-Jazeera's new English-language website has suffered a number of denial-of-service attacks since the war began, in which hackers flooded the site with junk messages.

Visitors were also redirected to web pages with pro-US messages or pornography.

Iraq expelled correspondents for the US cable news broadcaster CNN last week.

(edited to add rest of storyas link was fcuked up)
 
I'd like to know why the fuck they're using cluster bombs when it's well known how much carnage they cause to civilians during and after the conflict. Just as bad as landmines.

From what I heard 2 days ago the US military had used up 9,000 of their reported stockpile of 48,000 precision weapons (JDAMs, cruise missiles) thus far, so it's not like they're running out of them.

PS Your link doesn't work the scouser
 
Advance elements of US 3rd Infantry at Baghdad Airport.

Four republican guard divisions moving south, route unknown.

(Sky)
 
news reports are beginning to suggest that the us f/a18 shot down in southern iraq may have fallen victim to a patriot missile.
 
Originally posted by grasshopper
Airport still not secured despite earlier reports.

A reporter, standing on the tarmac of Saddam International Airport, has just said, live on Skye, that "there is no sign of any Iraqi opposition".
 
Well BBC News 24 has said the coalition "has begun" to take control of the airport. But sounds like they're pretty much there tbh.

Meanwhile Mr Bush delivers yet another gung-ho speech to another rapturous audience of military personnel (marines I think). Is it me or is Dubya choosing "safe" audiences? At least Blair has had the guts to debate with anti-war protestors, face to face.
 
Don't mistake the need to appear sincere with guts Loki. Anyone who authorizes the ariel bombardment of civilians is an unmitigated coward.
 
Originally posted by Loki
At least Blair has had the guts to debate with anti-war protestors, face to face.

Not any more he doesn't.

Apart from the House of Commons, he has only been seen at Aldershot barracks since the war started.

Spineless scum!

john x
 
Originally posted by Loki
Well BBC News 24 has said the coalition "has begun" to take control of the airport. But sounds like they're pretty much there tbh.

Meanwhile Mr Bush delivers yet another gung-ho speech to another rapturous audience of military personnel (marines I think). Is it me or is Dubya choosing "safe" audiences? At least Blair has had the guts to debate with anti-war protestors, face to face.

Why in the world would the President of the United States subject himself to a face to face debate with out of control anti-war protestors. That tiny group of active protestors (less than 1% of the population) would only make world headlines claiming ALL Americans are against the war. We all know how the left twists the truth. Al Jazeera would have a field day with footage like that.

Anyway the polls over here show the American public (most recent poll) are firmly behind Mr. Bush by 71% (conservatively).
 
wasnt al jazeera made by a bunch of wealthy americans or summat? i have doubts of wether they are really showing us the iraqi side of the war, although they do show blood and guts etc. but hmmm i think theres summat fishy abt it
 
wasnt al jazeera made by a bunch of wealthy americans or summat? i have doubts of wether they are really showing us the iraqi side of the war, although they do show blood and guts etc. but hmmm i think theres summat fishy abt it

WTF? Al Jazeera is the most repected news organisation in the Arab world. Right now, they are showing us nothing of the Iraqi side, because Iraq has kicked them out (fuck knows why). The channel was founded in the gulf by local businessmen.
 
Originally posted by localbrew
Why in the world would the President of the United States subject himself to a face to face debate with out of control anti-war protestors.


Well you have an out of control Un-President so he should feel at home. :D

Originally posted by localbrew


Anyway the polls over here show the American public (most recent poll) are firmly behind Mr. Bush by 71% (conservatively).

With your media I probably wouldn't expect anything else. Remember there is 'Lies, Damn Lies and Rupert Murdoch's Fox News.'
 
Originally posted by Lock&Light
Unexplained powders and liquids found in tunnels under Baghdad (officially no longer Saddam) Airport.

.....cleaning lady taken in for questioning.

:D :p
 
Back
Top Bottom