Barking_Mad
Non sibi sed omnibus
Apologies, it was early
Thanks for the link. At least its possible to work out how they leapt to that conclusion. Unlike the totally bizarre comments about the media somehow being soft on people by describing them only as paedophiles, and the suggestion that paedophiles are pittied rather than demonised by the press. Quite who that message is going to resonate with given its staggering detachment from reality is beyond me.
you love the tory press, don't youApols if this has already been posted. But
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/541793/SNP-activist-killed-over-child-sex-files
Whut? Not sure what you are suggesting here: that the Tory press is deliberately muddying the water? Hardly - Willie McRae's death has been a mystery for years. Are you pointing to a larger story of disinformation?you love the tory press, don't you
i'm pointing to articul8's apparently uncritical acceptance of a story in a paper notable for its constant hysteria and support for the political right.Whut? Not sure what you are suggesting here: that the Tory press is deliberately muddying the water? Hardly - Willie McRae's death has been a mystery for years. Are you pointing to a larger story of disinformation?
Danny posted it/related a week ago.It is an interesting article - and very shocking if true.
It's entirely speculative like almost everything on this subject. Was curious about the emphasis on Tory.i'm pointing to articul8's apparently uncritical acceptance of a story in a paper notable for its constant hysteria and support for the political right.
it would be shocking. a true article in the express?It is an interesting article - and very shocking if true.
how else would you describe the politics of the express?It's entirely speculative like almost everything on this subject. Was curious about the emphasis on Tory.
Of course they are Tory. I am probably being thick but don't understand how this relates to spinning out this story.how else would you describe the politics of the express?
articul8 poses as a socialist. yet he uncritically accepts a tissue of supposition from a paper antipathetick to his political beliefs.Of course they are Tory. I am probably being thick but don't understand how this relates to spinning out this story.
there is a tension between the political beliefs articul8 affects and the political position espoused by the express. how many more times do you want me to say it before it seeps through your skull?I mean, what is the Tory advantage here?
which claim, your claim of socialism or their claim of some malign conspiracy behind the death of this gentleman?in this case I think the claim bears further investigation
because they paid for itI put it back at you, Pickman's model, what is your theory of why the Express would be spinning out this story now? Chaff? That's assuming there is no basis for their speculation, of course - and supposing for a moment that there was some basis, why would they publish the story, except to sell papers? In which case, their Torytude is irrelevant really. The Mirror is just as bad.
LOL. Why pay for something you can get for free?because they paid for it
i am pleased to see you come round to my view of the veracity of the story.LOL. Why pay for something you can get for free?
We should always ask ourselves why these Tories - or any news medium for that matter - are telling us this shit. Because it sells papers is an obvious answer, but not always an adequate one.
The Sunday Fail bravely posts an article about dead people (possibly forgetting that Jeremy Thorpe is still alive).
Two members of Theresa May’s panel inquiring into child sex abuse are facing calls to resign after being accused of sending threatening or insulting emails to victims who had criticised the inquiry.
Lawyers for one abuse survivor have written to the home secretary to complain of a string of unsolicited communications, including an allegedly threatening email sent two days before an official meeting that both panellists and an abuse survivor were due to attend