You appear to be assuming that improving insulation was the primary motivating factor rather than being a variety of justifiable excuse.
I'm simply reading from (but not trusting those who submitted and approved) the planning application -
Grenfell Tower Regeneration Project SUSTAINABILITY AND ENERGY STATEMENT PLANNING APPLICATION
2.0 REFURBISHMENT RESPONSE TO EXISTING ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES
2.1 Insulation
Improving the insulation levels of the walls, roof and windows is the top priority of this refurbishment.
Personally, I would put fire safety as a more important priority than "insulation levels".
The planning application was submitted by Max Fordham, a building engineering services company hired by KCTMO.
Max Fordham -
Wikipedia -
Fordham's own firm's website which doesn't list Grenfell Tower as one of their projects. Presumably, that's because they deleted anything incriminating.
If charges of manslaughter and arrests are to be made then Max Fordham, the company and the man himself, should be in the dock, along with the engineers responsible for the planning application because the engineering was incompetently and recklessly done creating a very dangerous fire hazard.
MAX FORDHAM LLP TEAM CONTRIBUTORS
Mark Palmer, Senior Engineer / Partner
Andrew McQuatt, Lead Engineer / Partner
Matt Smith, Engineer
The Guardian has a flow chart of the various companies also in the frame for corporate and individual manslaughter charges.
Complex chain of companies that worked on Grenfell Tower raises oversight concerns
Yes they are all culpable for the way they spent the limited money that was available, on the particular refurbishment project that they approved. What money they spent was spent foolishly, recklessly and I would say criminally.
I support David Lammy MP's call for arrests on corporate manslaughter charges. What's the interesting political question is how far up the levels of government should such charges be laid?
Straight to the top, if you ask me.
Well arresting Max Fordham and putting him in the dock takes us straight to the top via all the kingdom's institutions, such as the University of Bath, which validated his so-called "professional competence", see
his wikipedia entry where they are listed.
The kingdom's institutions who validated Fordham, all have the blessing, the approval, charters, etc of Her Majesty the Queen.
So really the Queen should be in the dock of the people's courts. But then as a republican, I would say that.
The local council which approved the planning application also is criminally negligent and culpable for being as naive as Humpty Dumpty for trusting Max Fordham and all the Queen's men.
Presumably the government inspectors and fire building codes are not up to scratch either.
The people are absolutely right to demand justice and to take this to the very top.