Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Grenfell Tower fire in North Kensington - news and discussion

I strongly suspect that over the next few months, RBKC and KCTMO will wheel out sheaves of documents showing how thoroughly they "consulted" the residents through opinion surveys and informal "events" in community spaces. Analysis of this consultation will show that far from offering choices, the options offered were what the landlord wanted, not what the tenants wanted.

Personally seen their 'form' for completely misrepresenting these 'consultations'.

Very simple cherry picking of lone supporting voices, and restricting the actual surveyed population.

Went to one 'consultation' that nearly ended up in a riot as they were telling residents their garages were being scrapped to sell the area as a trendy hot-desking space, with all textbook hipster credentials. When the report came out that the palns "generally well received" I took a long time to calm down (again!).

The Subterrania/Neighbourhood/SupperClub/12 Acklam Road/Mode/Show-Your-Age-By-Telling-Me-What-You-Knew-It-As :p club was a constant source of complaints from the residents that were opposite it, and could hear the bass every time the doors opened. 100's of houses were literally 15m/across a cobbled street from the doors of the club. Turns out their objections weren't considered relevant, nor where they notified of any licensing changes (to appeal against them) as they didn't share a connecting wall to the nightclub :D

Slightly unrelated, but as an example to raise some suspicion they are probably crooked, as well as incompetent...I wasn't close to it, but the local library was sold to a prestigious (and tough to get in) prep school. After months of protests (obviously). Some co-incidence the guy in charge had applied to have his kids go to said prep school...

(Again, all very trivial, but just 3 examples off the top of my head where the consultation process is bollocks.)

They are in charge of probably the most lucrative underused (privately) real estate in the country. And they will try to do anything to maximize it and take it out of the locals' hands.
 
I doubt there's any conspiracy to cover this up - the media tends to exaggerate, not understate body counts and papers today have unanimously been leading with the safety angle, from the Daily Star to the Financial Times.

One can only hope that, if the reports are true, they aren't reporting it until there are people in place to deal properly with the families left behind - not putting people in bedsits or hostels and phone numbers to call if they are upset, but real homes with real support ready to go.
 
Or to arrange funding for immediate temporary accommodation, or start working to open up housing stock in the borough for residents, or guarantee funding for a rebuild, or alter legislation to allow councils to do it themselves, or a million other things that the useless fuck will completely avoid by saying 'lessons will be learned'.
She hasn't even said lessons will he learned, she said lessons MAY be learned!!!!
 
One can only hope that, if the reports are true, they aren't reporting it until there are people in place to deal properly with the families left behind - not putting people in bedsits or hostels and phone numbers to call if they are upset, but real homes with real support ready to go.

Mail etc. seem to have been following standard procedure so far: Find someone who says there might be hundreds dead, then put "Hundreds Dead" in quotation marks in their headlines.
 
I see Corbyn and Labour are now coming out and saying empty homes in the area should be requistioned!

Good on 'em.

The difference between May and Corbyn on this disaster could not be more different

From Harman and Lammy too.
 
Personally seen their 'form' for completely misrepresenting these 'consultations'.

Very simple cherry picking of lone supporting voices, and restricting the actual surveyed population.

Went to one 'consultation' that nearly ended up in a riot as they were telling residents their garages were being scrapped to sell the area as a trendy hot-desking space, with all textbook hipster credentials. When the report came out that the palns "generally well received" I took a long time to calm down (again!).

The Subterrania/Neighbourhood/SupperClub/12 Acklam Road/Mode/Show-Your-Age-By-Telling-Me-What-You-Knew-It-As :p club was a constant source of complaints from the residents that were opposite it, and could hear the bass every time the doors opened. 100's of houses were literally 15m/across a cobbled street from the doors of the club. Turns out their objections weren't considered relevant, nor where they notified of any licensing changes (to appeal against them) as they didn't share a connecting wall to the nightclub :D

Slightly unrelated, but as an example to raise some suspicion they are probably crooked, as well as incompetent...I wasn't close to it, but the local library was sold to a prestigious (and tough to get in) prep school. After months of protests (obviously). Some co-incidence the guy in charge had applied to have his kids go to said prep school...

(Again, all very trivial, but just 3 examples off the top of my head where the consultation process is bollocks.)

They are in charge of probably the most lucrative underused (privately) real estate in the country. And they will try to do anything to maximize it and take it out of the locals' hands.
I largely agree about consultation processes.

Regarding the last bit though - as far as I can make out, this particular project was not one that involved selling off space to private developers. It involved improvements to all of the existing housing units and communal areas plus the addition of 7 new ones at low level. All of those new units being for social rent.
 
Where the fuck's the government? Where the fuck's the council? Where the fuck's the mayor?

Don't you worry, I am sure they are working their soft hands to the bones sorting this out in the background, They have probably decided to make too many appearences as it will get in the way of the REAL issues. As our Strong And Stable PM in waiting recently said - lets get to work!
 
The usual cause of people hoying stuff out of their windows, when it does happen, is rubbish chutes that are semi-permanently blocked. Back when the towers went up, caretakers constantly checked and rodded the chutes. Nowadays a job has to be raised to clear a single blockage, sometimes meaning a day or two days of delay.

my chute was blocked for months on one occasions. usually would be at least 3 or 4 days. resident caretakers make blocs much safer and better maintained - but a rarity these days.
 
Any building which will have an impact on a conservation area will be assessed in this way. It's assessed because of the existence of the conservation area, not because of who lives in the conservation area. If such an assessment was not made, the planning officer would not be doing their job according to planning legislation. Do you have an objection to the basic principle of conservation areas?
Surely the impact assessment would be in the new construction rather than in an existing one!
 
It's just, local communities and the wider public can do so much in such a short space out of their own time, money and resources, and yet anybody with any power and control are fucking useless.

It definitely looks that way. Well in fact it is. From what I've seen/heard it appears that the volunteers have been completely overwhelmed with contributions, hoping for some help from the council such as additional storage. Couple of officials have looked in on them but practical help? None
 
How long before before serious victim blaming begins, or some fabricated allegation of deliberate fire raising sabotage to save political necks gets underway? The anger needs a channel to put these deregulating privatising gangster fuckers on their backs.
 
Back
Top Bottom