Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Grenfell Tower fire in North Kensington - news and discussion

the mods' contempt for and hatred of fotlers and 'loons like yourself exceeds the derision in which i am held among them. please cease and desist from continuing this line of posting, this subject's far too serious for your fotler/'loon ways.
The line of posting I am pursuing is simply one of correctly dealing with personal abuse.

I suggest that you cease from joining in attempted bullying.
 
I don't know what else you are suggesting. It would be pretty strange to suggest that the contents of CS's posts do not comprise personal abuse, and I can assure you that I did not post them myself having logged into his/her account myself.
you are making yourself ridiculous. what you complain of as abuse (being called a twat) is nothing more than gentle mockery in urban terms. and you can't in all honesty deny you are a 'loon while you do come across as something of a twat. cease and desist from this line of posting - you may not give a flying fuck about the fire at grenfell tower, but so many other people do that this exchange, and your behaviour which prompted it, is unwelcome.
 
I don't know what else you are suggesting. It would be pretty strange to suggest that the contents of CS's posts do not comprise personal abuse, and I can assure you that I did not post them myself.

And yet the mods seem strangely reluctant to take any action, despite your announcing that you've reported the posts in question.

This is in contrast to the promptness with which your WTC posts were removed from the thread yesterday when I reported them.

Draw your own conclusions...
 
you are making yourself ridiculous. what you complain of as abuse (being called a twat) is nothing more than gentle mockery in urban terms. and you can't in all honesty deny you are a 'loon while you do come across as something of a twat. cease and desist from this line of posting - you may not give a flying fuck about the fire at grenfell tower, but so many other people do that this exchange, and your behaviour which prompted it, is unwelcome.
You are prolonging this exchange, the matter was already dealt with. The contents of your post are too ridiculous to address.
 
The contents of your post are too ridiculous to address.

This thread is about this.
images
 
I don't know what else you are suggesting. It would be pretty strange to suggest that the contents of CS's posts do not comprise personal abuse, and I can assure you that I did not post them myself.
Yes, they might have been abusive. And that would have, as teqniq points out, entirely in keeping with official board policy on conspiraloonery and 9/11 idiocy.
 
if you think the fire - which killed at least 80 people - too ridiculous to address, you should not only gtfo the thread but gtfo the boards.
:rolleyes:

Of course, it is not Grenfell Tower that is 'too ridiculous' to address, it is your insinuation that I do not care about the subject or its victims or survivors.

I suggest that if you indeed wish to discuss Grenfell Tower (rather than defending the rights of posters to abuse others) that you return to precisely that topic as this exchange has become incredibly tedious.
 
I am *so* tempted to 'shop a couple of airliners into that pic, only I think that our estimable mods might take an extremely dim view, not to mention quite a lot of Urban. Just let it be known I thought about it and decided against, discretion being the better part of valour :)
I have reported this post for repeating the proscribed topic.
 
:rolleyes:

Of course, it is not Grenfell Tower that is 'too ridiculous' to address, it is your insinuation that I do not care about the subject or its victims or survivors.

I suggest that if you indeed wish to discuss Grenfell Tower (rather than defending the rights of posters to abuse others) that you return to precisely that topic as this exchange has become incredibly tedious.
Something I have noticed is that when you start to resort to this quasi-legalese posturing, it's usually a sign that you're on the back foot. I take this as an encouraging sign, in the context. Because attempting, even in the most oblique way, to link this to the canonical 9/11 bollocks is probably about No. 3 on the list of Most Insensitive Positions To Take On A Grenfell Thread. I shall leave it to those with more fecund imaginations than mine to conceive of #2 and #1.
 
Something I have noticed is that when you start to resort to this quasi-legalese posturing, it's usually a sign that you're on the back foot. I take this as an encouraging sign, in the context. Because attempting, even in the most oblique way, to link this to the canonical 9/11 bollocks is probably about No. 3 on the list of Most Insensitive Positions To Take On A Grenfell Thread. I shall leave it to those with more fecund imaginations than mine to conceive of #2 and #1.
It is not me that is continuing to introduce that topic here on this thread. I'm guessing you haven't been reading the thread properly.
 
How about you rein in the personal abuse?

I have to say I don't find your posts terribly classy.

I have reported this post for abuse.

For someone who clearly has no obstacle to giving forthright advice, it's somewhat hypocritical for you to suggest only moderators may give it.

Again, I suggest you rein in the personal abuse.

I have reported your subsequent editing of your post as a fresh post for personal abuse.

Maybe as much as you Mr model! :)

The line of posting I am pursuing is simply one of correctly dealing with personal abuse.

I suggest that you cease from joining in attempted bullying.

'framing' as in making explicit, obviously.

I don't know what else you are suggesting. It would be pretty strange to suggest that the contents of CS's posts do not comprise personal abuse, and I can assure you that I did not post them myself.

You are prolonging this exchange, the matter was already dealt with. The contents of your post are too ridiculous to address.

:rolleyes:

Of course, it is not Grenfell Tower that is 'too ridiculous' to address, it is your insinuation that I do not care about the subject or its victims or survivors.

I suggest that if you indeed wish to discuss Grenfell Tower (rather than defending the rights of posters to abuse others) that you return to precisely that topic as this exchange has become incredibly tedious.

I have reported this post for repeating the proscribed topic.

It is not me that is continuing to introduce that topic here on this thread. I'm guessing you haven't been reading the thread properly.
yeh. please could you stop making this the squirrelp show and either leave the thread or post on topic. this isn't about you - despite your evident belief it is - it is about the dreadful fire and its aftermath.
 
yeh. please could you stop making this the squirrelp show and either leave the thread or post on topic. this isn't about you - despite your evident belief it is - it is about the dreadful fire and its aftermath.
With respect, I have done nothing here except stand up to abuse and against the baiting on a topic proscribed by the moderators. If you want to return to Grenfell Tower then you can and should do exactly that.
 
Worth tuning into lbc at the moment. James o'brien is broadcasting from Kensington and talking to people who volunteered and continue to do so in the aftermath of it. It still sounds chaotic and just complete abandonment from the local authority! I feel quite inspired and amazed by the things people have done off their own backs.
 
Back
Top Bottom