had a very poor rep before it was flats, when the dhss were there. interesting pdf: http://ruthewan.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/How-to-Make-Archway-Tower-Disappear.pdfyep archway tower. Because of that change of use clause they will have had to fit sprinklers throughout, and fire doors on every landing which they did do.
from the above link:Property hazards and landlords Duty of Care..
Worth reading from Duty of Care onwards.
Property Hazards and the Landlord's Duty of Care
Design and construction
Notwithstanding the landlord's historical immunity, there are specific situations where the courts have held that a landlord can be liable for negligence when letting a property. Builders, developers, architects, surveyors and designers who have failed to exercise reasonable care in the work that they have carried out on a building have been held to be liable to the occupiers of that building for injury or damage resulting from their negligence.
It may be 600, "Number 10" is now saying.I doubt they know.
As we speak there is almost certainly a lot of contractors, sub-contractors and merchants all scrawling through their old receipts to see what was actually put on the wall.
We've had this all before. It's the same debate as a century ago.
It really does.Sometimes it feels like we have gone back a century.
Councillor Georgia Gould said:“The new results from the laboratory show that the outer cladding panels themselves are made up of aluminium panels with a polyethylene core.
“Therefore the panels that were fitted were not to the standard that we had commissioned. In light of this, we will be informing the contractor that we will be taking urgent legal advice.
Camden are taking down the cladding on some of their buildings immediately and putting 24 hour fire wardens on site while they do so.
Work was done by Rydon and Harley Facades, the same contractors as the Grenfell tower and Camden say that the cladding used was not the cladding that was specified.
Exclusive: Cladding to be removed from Camden blocks after tests reveal similarities with Grenfell Tower
They may be able to get away with adding extra fire breaks, and updating existing fire protection within the building (e.g. sprinklers, improved egress, being thorough about compartmentalisation). The problem with Grenfell wasn't just that the cladding appears to have caught fire rapidly, but that there was weak protection inside the building. Also if it happened again elsewhere I doubt anyone would stay in their flat as advised to on this occasion.
This tower (before & after pics below) is where 'mr bimble' lives at the moment, on 14th floor. It was clad as part of the transformation from 70s brutalist office block to swanky flats. There is cladding on so many buildings now, I have no clue of course if this building was done safely whilst Grenfell wasn't but am sure they'll find residents asking questions even here.
View attachment 109909
Closeups from the architects in here GRID Architects | Archway TowerIf you get a close up photo of the new cladding I'll probably be able to tell if its an ACM panel.
more working class cohesion in 1917. And October of that year was quite special...Sometimes it feels like we have gone back a century.
Closeups from the architects in here GRID Architects | Archway Tower
I'll try taking pictures of the real thing when next there. (thanks)
Yes, thanks. It looks plasticy in real life, the cladding, to a clueless eye anyway. But that place has very good internal fire prevention measures, as it seems it had to have by law as it went through 'significant change of use'. That makes so little sense to me - why does change of use mean you must install sprinklers etc, whilst total refurb whilst keeping same use doesn't.The problem is if the last week has taught us anything is that what the architect proposed and what was used are not always the same.
The CGI's look like they were proposing a GRC panel which would be a good thing as its a concrete based system. Test report here: http://telling.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Firetest-classification-report-grc.pdf
The problem is if the last week has taught us anything is that what the architect proposed and what was used are not always the same.
See this is a prime example of how architects sell a scheme which ends up looking nothing like the proposals.You can see it undergoing refurbishment in google maps.
^ that looks dodgy as hell, says someone who knows nothing about cladding. View attachment 109911
If you resign when you don't want to but are told to... Isn't that more sacked than resigned?
it wasn't even his boss who said "go" but a minister who has no real business doing this sort of thing.If you resign when you don't want to but are told to... Isn't that more sacked than resigned?
The only reason I think of for resign rather than sacked is avoiding an unfair dismissal claim as with baby p. But you are probably right, these super annuated arseholes have no shameFucker probably got 1/4 of a million to do it as well.
May run out of Kensington again last night.
Theresa May booed after visiting Grenfell Tower residents
Any developments other than having to visit and reassure residents?From a housing point of view , the shit has hit the fan #cladding