Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Filth by name. . .

"Inspector Clive Summerill of Avon & Somerset Police is alleged to have had sex with the female who was so drunk she cannot remember it and was not in a position to give consent, a misconduct panel heard.

The officer, who is currently suspended from duty, denies the allegations ..."

Married police inspector denies raping woman in hotel


STAPLE_HILL_PKG_FOR_ONLINE.1.jpg


(Source: itv.com)

Inspector Clive Summerill, who is based in South Gloucestershire, said in a police interview they had a "drunken fumble" but did not have sex.

A criminal investigation was launched by an independent police force but no further action was taken, the panel heard.
 
Jesus wept.

CPS declined to charge undercover police officer who deceived woman into 19-year relationship - Guardian

  • Senior officers convened in 2013 to hear ‘unbelievably bad’ news about relationship
  • Prosecutors did not hear evidence from victim before deciding not to charge officer for misconduct
  • Woman not told true identity of man with whom she has a child until 2020, when they were engaged

The headline and those bullet points only scratch the surface - you need to read the whole article.

While she remained completely oblivious that the man she was sharing her life with was using a fictional identity provided to him by police, dozens of officials were aware of that fact. In addition to CPS prosecutors, they included staff at two official watchdogs, a judge-led public inquiry, Avon and Somerset police and the body representing Britain’s top police officers.
(...)
Since she was informed, in August 2020, Mary’s family allege that senior police officers have bullied and threatened her into staying silent. They accuse police of orchestrating a cover-up as part of an attempt to protect the force.
 
Jesus wept.

CPS declined to charge undercover police officer who deceived woman into 19-year relationship - Guardian



The headline and those bullet points only scratch the surface - you need to read the whole article.


(...)
That's this. Absolutely disgraceful. That women deserves justice.

It's just one piece of shitbaggery after another.

Mary’s family question whether the force really was working “as quickly possible” to tell her the news, given it took them seven years to do so. They also question whether it was appropriate for [Andy, Avon and Somerset’s chief constable] Marsh’s wife, Nikki Watson, currently the deputy chief constable at Avon and Somerset, to take the leading role in the force’s handling of the highly sensitive case in early 2017. Mary’s family allege the appointment presented a conflict of interest because Watson was leading a case that had the potential to damage her husband’s tenure at the helm of Avon and Somerset police.

By then, [Andy] Marsh and [Nikki] Watson’s marital relationship had already raised eyebrows and prompted questions in parliament and the media around risks of a conflict of interest. It had been agreed that his wife should report to another senior officer and any disciplinary issues would be examined by another force.
 
There is greater detail regarding the activities of the Metropolitan Police's PC Tom Phillips here:

Metropolitan Police officer who sent ‘grossly offensive’ racist messages to ex-partner jailed

74746959-12447871-image-a-49_1693043163210.jpg


74746731-12447871-image-m-24_1693042942068.jpg


74746733-12447871-image-a-46_1693043060464.jpg


74746735-12447871-image-m-45_1693043057484.jpg


20111224082822!Metropolitan_Police_Logo.png

As the sentencing Judge, Louisa Cieciora, said to the publicity-shy and safety conscious PC Tom Phillips of the Metropolitan Police:

"You were a serving police officer at the time, and serving police officers are expected to reflect the values of our society, to protect those who are vulnerable, and not to have or demonstrate bias based on personality characteristics.

‘The probation officer said your language and actions demonstrate you harbour those core beliefs of racial hatred as well as misogyny.

I am not persuaded there is a realistic prospect of rehabilitation and I am satisfied appropriate punishment can only be achieved by immediate custody.’

"A police officer who called another officer a “n****r”, a “mongrel” and a “spade” almost escaped without charge, the Crown Prosecution Service has admitted ..."

Racist Croydon police officer almost avoided charges


74746735-12447871-image-m-45_1693043057484.jpg

When Ms Ryan reported the racist messages sent in spring 2021 by the Metropolitan Police's PC Tom Phillips, the Crown Prosecution Service marked the case for “no further action”.

The decision was only reversed under the Victim’s Right to Review scheme, the Crown Prosecution Service has acknowledged.
 
Jesus wept.

CPS declined to charge undercover police officer who deceived woman into 19-year relationship - Guardian



The headline and those bullet points only scratch the surface - you need to read the whole article.


(...)

Racist Croydon police officer almost avoided charges


74746735-12447871-image-m-45_1693043057484.jpg

When Ms Ryan reported the racist messages sent in spring 2021 by the Metropolitan Police's PC Tom Phillips, the Crown Prosecution Service marked the case for “no further action”.

The decision was only reversed under the Victim’s Right to Review scheme, the Crown Prosecution Service has acknowledged.
Time's up for the CPS?
 
Yeah, the CPS needs a good rebuilding, they are not prosecuting some exceedingly serious crimes that absolutely need prosecuting.

I know there are problems across the whole justice system, and in certain areas staffing has been cut to the bone. It's got to stop.
 
There's also this one, where somebody allegedly lied about their right to wear the Falklands medal...he was apparently 15 at the time of the Falklands War.


I know people used to lie about their age to get into the army, but I doubt the paras were taking kids with them.
 
A Northumbria Police sergeant is alleged to have made sexual advances towards one of his colleagues, and to have subjected the officer to "humiliating and offensive comments and acts".

Now this is from last Saturday, the 23rd of September:

On Monday (September 25), Sgt Wright will face a three-day misconduct hearing over three allegations, where the panel will determine whether his behaviour amounted to 'gross misconduct'.

Within the misconduct documents, released ahead of the hearing, Sgt Wright is alleged to have frequently made inappropriate embarrassing, degrading, humiliating, and offensive comments to a colleague between November 2019 and December 2021.

The comments were often sexual in nature.

The second allegation relates to an incident in August 2020, which saw Sgt Wright approach PC A from behind and slap her on the bottom with his hand while shouting “Woo”.

Sgt Wright will also face a third allegation during next week's hearing, which states that around November or December 2020, whilst on duty, he came behind PC A and made loud and overtly sexual noises.

It is also alleged that Sgt Wright was carrying a hand sanitiser at the time and used the same to simulate a sexual act in the presence of and directed towards PC A.

I'd be grateful if anybody knows the outcome of this hearing and posts it here.

Police sergeant to face misconduct panel for alleged two year 'humiliation' of PC
 
A Dorset Police officer is charged with carrying out a series of sexual attacks in April 2022.

PC Ravi Canhye 47 remains suspended by Dorset Police.

The Dorset officer slapped and bit the woman like an "animal", Winchester Crown Court previously heard.

He denies two rapes, three assaults by penetration, an attempted rape and a sexual assault, as well as a sexual assault on another woman.

He raped his friend and threatened to abuse her, the jury previously heard.

Dorset Police officer accused of rape 'told woman sex was a mistake'
 
There's also this one, where somebody allegedly lied about their right to wear the Falklands medal...he was apparently 15 at the time of the Falklands War.

i'm sure i've read that it is (or was) a criminal offence to wear medals / medal ribbons you're not entitled to. not sure if it still is.

this bloke seems to be claiming that two of the medals were his brother's - i think there are circumstances where widow or child of a deceased veteran may wear their medals, but not sure that someone should mix their own with a deceased relative / partner's.

never having been in the military, and dad only having done national service in the early 50s (which you didn't get a medal 'with the rations' for), i don't know the detail.

Ridiculous that they're allowed to wear military medals for work anyway.

dunno - think other uniformed services (police, screws) have traditionally been allowed to wear medal ribbons from their time in the military.

as in

p467086_i_v9_ab.jpg


i'm not sure but think there were bus-men around in the 70s who wore medal ribbons from 1939-45 service.
 
"A man has been handed a five-year sentence for raping and sexually assaulting a woman while he was a serving police officer.

He will spend two-and-a-half-years in custody, with a similar period on supervised licence.

,.. He will also be placed on the sex offenders register indefinitely."

Former Police Service of Northern Ireland officer jailed for raping woman

PSNI%20logo.png

article-0-0BB707BB00000578-248_233x368.jpg

The 55-year-old former Police Service of Northern Ireland policeman, who has not been named for legal reasons, was found guilty earlier in the year of two counts of rape and two counts of sexual assault.
 
i'm sure i've read that it is (or was) a criminal offence to wear medals / medal ribbons you're not entitled to. not sure if it still is.

this bloke seems to be claiming that two of the medals were his brother's - i think there are circumstances where widow or child of a deceased veteran may wear their medals, but not sure that someone should mix their own with a deceased relative / partner's.

never having been in the military, and dad only having done national service in the early 50s (which you didn't get a medal 'with the rations' for), i don't know the detail.



dunno - think other uniformed services (police, screws) have traditionally been allowed to wear medal ribbons from their time in the military.

as in

p467086_i_v9_ab.jpg


i'm not sure but think there were bus-men around in the 70s who wore medal ribbons from 1939-45 service.
The Armed Forces Act 2006 does state "It also became an offence falsely to represent oneself as a person entitled to wear such a decoration or medal, or to supply decorations or medals to unauthorised persons without lawful authority or excuse."
 
this bloke seems to be claiming that two of the medals were his brother's - i think there are circumstances where widow or child of a deceased veteran may wear their medals, but not sure that someone should mix their own with a deceased relative / partner's.
It was discussed on here in relation to Penny Mordaunt wearing her dad's medals, and apparently it's OK to wear medals belonging to a relative, but you are supposed to pin them to your right breast instead of your left.
 
The Armed Forces Act 2006 does state "It also became an offence falsely to represent oneself as a person entitled to wear such a decoration or medal, or to supply decorations or medals to unauthorised persons without lawful authority or excuse."

oh dear.

that could all get embarrassing...

It was discussed on here in relation to Penny Mordaunt wearing her dad's medals, and apparently it's OK to wear medals belonging to a relative, but you are supposed to pin them to your right breast instead of your left.

i thought it might be something like that.
 
i'm sure i've read that it is (or was) a criminal offence to wear medals / medal ribbons you're not entitled to. not sure if it still is.

this bloke seems to be claiming that two of the medals were his brother's - i think there are circumstances where widow or child of a deceased veteran may wear their medals, but not sure that someone should mix their own with a deceased relative / partner's.

never having been in the military, and dad only having done national service in the early 50s (which you didn't get a medal 'with the rations' for), i don't know the detail.



dunno - think other uniformed services (police, screws) have traditionally been allowed to wear medal ribbons from their time in the military.

as in

p467086_i_v9_ab.jpg


i'm not sure but think there were bus-men around in the 70s who wore medal ribbons from 1939-45 service.
It just seems too much of a political statement, especially now there's no longer anyone of working age who served in WW2. I mean, they wouldn't be allowed to wear other symbols representating affiliations or beliefs. That's what I think anyway.
 
Yeah, my cousin has our grandad's medals from WWII - he never claimed them so she did, but she only wore hers at our gran's recent funeral.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom