It’s the wrong kind of misogyny then, clearly.
Can you explain why the article you posted is an act of silencing against women?It’s the wrong kind of misogyny then, clearly.
Why has he singled her out for vilification rather than any of the male writers who do similar? Answers on a postcard to the usual address.Can you explain why the article you posted is an act of silencing against women?
i'm not getting the silencing thing in this case - the only thing worse than being talked about being not being talked about, as oscar wilde pointed out
even if it was a hatchet job that's maybe misogyny (which might be better talked about on another thread) but not silencing.Apart from anything else it's not vilifying her at all. It's not only complimentary but it's generally positive about her writing - her adult novels are described as 'exhilarating'. Not sure how you'd read that article and see a hatchet job tbh.
I'm confused. Are you saying that any male reviewer who criticises an individual woman's piece of work is being misogynistic?Why has he singled her out for vilification rather than any of the male writers who do similar? Answers on a postcard to the usual address.
For a supposed literary critic, I’m struggling to find any other author he’s ‘reviewed’.I'm confused. Are you saying that any male reviewer who criticises an individual woman's piece of work is being misogynistic?
Just leave it to the professionals eh.For a supposed literary critic, I’m struggling to find any other author he’s ‘reviewed’.
For a supposed literary critic, I’m struggling to find any other author he’s ‘reviewed’.
He also mentions a couple of male authors he thinks share similar traitsWhy has he singled her out for vilification rather than any of the male writers who do similar? Answers on a postcard to the usual address.
That's primarily an example of a Palestinian being silenced in the cultural sphere, no? And a pretty chilling one.I'll shut up on this thread for a bit, but this is a far more egregious (top word) example of a woman being silenced in the cultural sphere:
Indiana University Cancels Survey for Palestinian Painter Samia Halaby
Indiana University's Eskenazi Museum of Art canceled a survey for the Palestinian painter Samia Halaby.www.artnews.com
He is a professional. Unless he penned the piece for free? He appears to have veered from his traditional fare here though to single out a female author for not writing ladylike or some shit. Just because she’s become wealthy through her work doesn’t alter the intent behind his article.Just leave it to the professionals eh.
How will the multi-millionaire JKR survive this silencing from an amateur critic in the New Statesman?
Yeah, looks like the issue is that Ms Halaby is Palestinian.That's primarily an example of a Palestinian being silenced in the cultural sphere, no? And a pretty chilling one.
Rowling spends much of her time claiming she is being silenced, the irony of course is that the right wing media loves to promote her while doing so,Why has he singled her out for vilification rather than any of the male writers who do similar? Answers on a postcard to the usual address.
Does she?Rowling spends much of her time claiming she is being silenced,
He is a professional. Unless he penned the piece for free? He appears to have veered from his traditional fare here though to single out a female author for not writing ladylike or some shit. Just because she’s become wealthy through her work doesn’t alter the intent behind his article.
That's primarily an example of a Palestinian being silenced in the cultural sphere, no? And a pretty chilling one.
Yeah, looks like the issue is that Ms Halaby is Palestinian.
I have no crystal ball that told me that I'd get a huge objection to highlighting a misogynistic article on a female writer on a thread about silencing women.But more to the point if you want to discuss JK Rowling, or the critical responses to her writing, or even the differences between the way male and female authors are critiqued, why not start a thread about it instead of turning this one into a binfire. You must have known that would happen. Is that what you wanted?
Specifically, he mentions that it's exhilarating to see a woman author venturing on to that territory: "Rowling’s propensity for spite is exhilarating, particularly as being celebrated for sheer nastiness is a privilege so often reserved for male authors: the violence of Cormac McCarthy, the vulgarity of Martin Amis, the perversity of Michel Houellebecq."He also mentions a couple of male authors he thinks share similar traits
The problem is mentioning someone that you disagree with on a different issue? Because other than that the criteria is correct. Some posters have disagreed that the article is misogynistic, as is their right.It's not a crystal ball you need, that's the mistake. We're not fantasists.
It's your thinking muscle that should have figured out the possibilities and implications. Don't worry, there's still time.
Some posters seems to equal everyone else though. Given the comments in response. It's probably a terrible idea to continue the conversation about this specifically but could you highlight some elements from it that you feel are misogynistic? I'm really not seeing what you are so would be good to understand.The problem is mentioning someone that you disagree with on a different issue? Because other than that the criteria is correct. Some posters have disagreed that the article is misogynistic, as is their right.
Was posted on bandwidth thread but relevant here.