Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

F1 2019

Hamilton is heavily odds on for title number 6, and the way Mercedes are going I think no.7 next year is highly likely.

If I were him, I'd want equalling Schumacher's record in the bag, then go to break it in the same car Schuey did.
 
I can’t see Lewis going to Ferrari. Why leave a winning team and why go to one whose home-based supporters are, quite frankly, a lot less likely to accept a black man. Lewis knows the reception he’s often received in Spain and Italy and a move to Ferrari would be to go looking for trouble imho.

Surely this would be the exact reason to do it, if you don't challenge those misconceptions, how do you change them?
 
One thing i recall :hmm: is that Hamilton has with Mercedes (as well as the car) is a lot of freedom with endorsement and his extra curricular projects.

Kinda the dream scenario though isn't it, look all the merch with Ferrari logos on, far outweighs Mercedes in the grand scheme of things once you look beyond F1.

E.g. don't think there's a single racing wheel for gaming with a Merc logo on it, but tons of Ferrari ones.
 
Kinda the dream scenario though isn't it, look all the merch with Ferrari logos on, far outweighs Mercedes in the grand scheme of things once you look beyond F1.

E.g. don't think there's a single racing wheel for gaming with a Merc logo on it, but tons of Ferrari ones.
I think it was more outside the team if you know what I mean. McLaren was a bit more restrictive from what I recall, not sure about Fezza
 
There are certainly arguments both ways, but I remain of the view Lewis will not make that move. Time will tell I guess.

Still leaves the question of what will Ferrari do about their underperforming German star. I don’t have them down as a patient outfit.
 
Italian press have the knives out for Vettel (again)
La Gazzetta dello Sport "Ferrari has a new leader, Leclerc is combative and energetic and has finally captured the heart of the Ferrari fans". It also described Vettel as "again disastrous" on Sunday, "Vettel has shown that he is not the driver that Ferrari wants. It is now clear that something is no longer working".

Corriere della Sera "Vettel loses his head once again, while the youngster Leclerc is gaining all the time in prestige".

La Repubblica "For a long time, Vettel has no longer looked like a four-time world champion, while the little prince Leclerc was driver of the day".

La Stampa "Maranello, we have a problem. Almost like an older brother, Binotto defends Vettel but the driver's crisis seems to be endless".

I'm not sure how long Ferrari can afford headlines like these, clearly there is no-one to replace Vettel at the moment, but I'm not sure they'll keep him for next year unless he really pulls his finger out and starts getting some results. I know there is a lot of chatter about Max going to Ferrari but at the moment all the smart money is going on him to move to Mercedes (if a seat opens up). Why would he leave a Red Bull that is fast catching Ferrari to go there, Ferrari are not producing the car at the moment and he has Adrian Newey designing his car for 2020 with Honda producing what looks to be a power-unit that is getting stronger and stronger. I think that Jos will be telling him to go where the money is at the moment, but only because Mercedes are so far in front, things may well be different after 2021.

Red Bull World record pit-stop
At last weekends British GP Red Bull got the World record for the fastest pit-stop in F1 history. When I read that I thought " that pit-stop where they got Max out in front of Charlies was really fast", but that isn't the stop that got them the record. It was the Pierre Gasly stop , they did it in 1.91 seconds :eek::thumbs:

Haas/Rich Energy
The Haas/Rich Energy story keeps rumbling on and on, but I can't be arsed to type all the he said, they said stuff. Other than to say the shareholders are still trying to oust William Storey. I watched Top Gear last night online, love the new line-up btw, and because I have been looking into Rich Energy and have them in the back of my mind, when Chris Harris was driving the old Lotus F1 car a though jumped into my head. Anyone remember David Thieme and the "Essex Overseas Petroleum Corporation"? He was a Lotus sponsor back in the late 70's early 80's and ended up in jail for fraud until being bailed out by McLaren's Mansour Ojjeh's Dad. Is William Storey going to be the 21st century David Thieme :D
 
Rich Energy saga coming to a close
According to new papers lodged at Companies House, William Storey is no longer a director or shareholder in the company and also Rich Energy has changed it names to Lightning Volt. The new guy in charge is Matthew Kell, who appears to have his fingers in a number of pies, from art galleries to construction companies.

It is unclear if Haas will have a new livery for the German GP but it seems clear that Kell will continue the sponsorship deal with Haas. A leaked letter from Haas appears to show that their lawyers had written to Storey claiming £35million in damages if Rich Energy was to try and cancel its sponsorship.

About fucking time
I have been saying to anyone who'd listen for years that if F1 really wants to improve overtaking in the sport they need to return to Ground Effect" cars. I fully understand why they banned ground effect in the first place, but F1 safety has improved massively since the early 1980's. The wake nowadays can effect a car running as much as 7 seconds behind the car in front, adding DRS zones is a con really and doesn't improve racing.

Nikolas Tombazis, the FIA's head of single seaters explained the technical reasons for seeking the switch "The first part of the objective is to improve the wake from the front car so the rear car doesn’t suffer so much performance loss. As an indication, current cars two car distances behind front car may lose almost half of their downforce and that makes it much more difficult to follow closely and creates a situation where you destroy the tyres much more easily, for two reasons. One is because the cars slide more and hence they destroy the tyres and secondly because obviously adding more turbulence and slow-moving air the tyres and the rest of the car don’t cool down as they do otherwise. "With ground effect the following car receives is much cleaner flow. Typically we are going from about 50 per cent loss of downforce for the following car at two car distances behind down to about five/10 per cent loss. So we have a massive reduction of the downforce loss for the following car".

About fucking time, I've spent hours shouting at the TV screen over many year everytime I've heard some F1 "expert" saying "we need to improve overtaking".

Simone Resta returning to Ferrari
As mentioned a while back (post #574 from last May) Simone Resta is on his way back to Ferrari. Resta was Ferrari's chief designer. He moved to be Alfa Romeo's technical director back in May 2018, his place as the technical director at Alfa will be taken by Jan Monchaux who is currently head of aerodynamics at the team. Resta is set to return to Ferrari in the summer
 
I just watched the ch.4 post race coverage and see EJ was promoting the Hamilton to Ferrari theory and also dropped a nugget that McLaren will soon have Merc engines.

If the latter comes to pass, which team will have to forego their Merc engines, as surely Merc will not be allowed to supply 4 teams while Renault have but a single team? Will Williams lose their engines as a penalty for poor performance or because they can’t afford the fees? Would Renault in fact offer a more affordable option to that team?

Or maybe there’s something we don’t know about going on between Racing Point and Merc which could lead to their engines being sent down the M40 to Woking?
 
Red Bull taking Rich Energy to court
In a week that has seen Rich Energy claim they were no longer title sponsors of Haas (only for the American team to deny it), William Storey no longer chief executive after selling his majority stake and a subsequent rebrand to Lightning Volt, they are now facing a second copyright infringement claim. Rich Energy tweeted early on Thursday to say that ‘Red Bull are taking William Storey to court even though the attached document names both Rich Energy and Storey as defendants.

The document reads "The plaintiff alleges copyright infringement against the defendants in relation to the use of identical and similar symbols to those of the plaintiff’s well-known brands Red Bull and Gives you Wing in the advertising of their energy drinks. The second defendant is the executive director and director of the first defendant." Rich Energy have already lost one copyright claim recently, with UK courts ruling that Rich Energy’s stag logo infringed the copyright of British bicycle brand Whyte Bikes logo.

Is Ocon about to replace Hulk at Haas

The big rumor doing the rounds at the moment is that Grojean will be getting the sack and will be replaced by Ocon. At Silverstone, both the Haas drivers crashed into each other and it seems that tensions in the team are high. There is also the team's struggles with their title sponsor Rich Energy. It is thought that Guenther Steiner rates Ocon highly and thinks that he would do a better job than both of his drivers.

An anonymous Formula 1 insider posted on Reddit last night. I'm close to someone who has been at a number of the races with great access. (The mods have seen evidence of this). What I’m hearing is that after the British GP, Steiner was furious at the drivers, blew up at them (for obvious reasons) and phoned Gene Haas for permission to fire a driver. Word in the paddock is that they are looking at Ocon to replace Grosjean. If possible, by the next Grand Prix. That's all I can say, for now, If this turns out to be correct, I'll be back with more”.

Although only rumors at this stage, it would make sense. The car hasn't been brilliant for Haas but Grojean is consistently the lesser of the two and bringing in the talent of Ocon could really boost the team. A number of F1 sites are running with this story, so I thought Ipass the news on to you guys :)

Mexico about to sign new deal
Mexico could be set to escape Liberty Media’s race axe. The F1 owner wants to keep the 2020 calendar at 21 races, even though new venues Zandvoort and Vietnam will be added to the schedule. So with Silverstone getting a new contract and Monza set to follow, it means Barcelona and Hockenheim look most likely to be ousted. Mexico, also with an expiring deal, is tipped to stay. The rumor is that a “handshake agreement” as already been done.
 
I just watched the ch.4 post race coverage and see EJ was promoting the Hamilton to Ferrari theory and also dropped a nugget that McLaren will soon have Merc engines.

If the latter comes to pass, which team will have to forego their Merc engines, as surely Merc will not be allowed to supply 4 teams while Renault have but a single team? Will Williams lose their engines as a penalty for poor performance or because they can’t afford the fees? Would Renault in fact offer a more affordable option to that team?

Or maybe there’s something we don’t know about going on between Racing Point and Merc which could lead to their engines being sent down the M40 to Woking?
I posted a story a little while ago about reports in the press that Williams were "actively looking" to get a deal to use Renault power-units for 2020, personally I think that would be another backward step for them as clearly Mercedes has the best power-unit in F1 at this current time. I"m sure McLaren would love to get a deal done to go back to Mercedes as they have a very long relationship with them. I also should point out that there are contradictory stories doing the rounds, as recent news reports claim that Williams are looking to extend their current deal with Mercedes, so both stories can't be correct.

Mercedes could supply McLaren at the moment as there is no rule against an engine supplier supplying more than 3 teams. The rules on engine supply were changed for the 2017 season and go until 2020. If you remember Renault were saying they would not supply Red Bull and Bernie and the FIA had to step in to ensure Red Bull got a power-unit for 2017/8. The FIA then changed the rules to ensure that all teams would get a supply of engines.

The rules changed and the FIA can now force an engine supplier to provide a power-unit to a team, to be an engine supplier you sign a document that has an “obligation to supply” clause written into it. It works like this, the FIA can make it compulsory for the manufacturer with the lowest number of customers to step in. The manufacturer will be obliged to do so, providing the relevant conditions are met by the customer team. Should a new power manufacturer enter F1, it will not be required to comply with this obligation of supply initially.
 
I’m surprised Red Bull think there’s any money left in the RE pot to make it worth suing them. Surely the beardy one has made off with the investors’ cash and Haas will be pouring money into an open drain by pursuing legal action against the company, let alone Red Bull trying to get anything more out of them?

Grosjean has had so many second chances and has underperformed so consistently, it’s a miracle his F1 career made it this far. I’d welcome him being given the boot - it might save someone getting killed by one of his famous myopic moments.
 
This is Red Bulls filing to the High Court
D_u4hAnWkAAnhXf.jpg
 
Haas lawyers letter to Rich Energy following them claiming to cancel the sponsorship agreement because of a performance clause in the contract, as you will see from the letter no such clause is written into the contract according to the Haas lawyers :) LOL
D_cukLNW4AI3WrE.jpg
 
Bernie looks ruff.

Watched the race last night, some good stuff in there. Seb is a clumsy dolt and surely can't be long for Ferrari?
 
Another title sponsor having problems
Racing Point title sponsor appears to be having a little problem, SportPesa their sponsor is a Kenyan sports betting company set up with Bulgarian finance. Their business has been put into recent doubt as the Kenyan government has introduced controls on advertising and the ability for bets to be placed on mobile networks. SportPesa insists it will not force a closure, despite business having halted according to local reports.

SportPesa's issues come hot on the heels of another controversy surrounding a new title sponsor in F1, Rich Energy. The energy drinks company has been reformed as Lightning Volt this week after a bitter public battle which saw CEO William Storey ousted after trying to terminate the Haas sponsorship over perceived poor performance.

In a statement just released SportPesa said "SportPesa wishes to refute claims that our business is closing down. We are in discussions with the government and relevant stakeholders and are positive that we will be back to full operation soon. Note that any update regarding our business is communicated through our channels".

Uralkali and Force India administrators Court case
Uralkali, who tried but failed to buy Force India last year, will face the F1 team’s administrators in court in 2020. Uralkali, a Russian chemical company owned by Dmitry Mazepin, was keen on buying the Force India team when it was placed into administration last July. However, instead a consortium led by Lawrence Stroll took over the F1 team, rebranding it Racing Point. Uralkali cried foul, blaming administrators FRP Advisory LLP and threatening legal action. That is now going ahead with Uralkali revealing the matter will go to trial in late 2020 with the company seeking “substantial damages” after losing out to a “lower bidder” in what they feel was a “flawed sales process”.

A statement from Uralkali said: “On July 17, the High Court in London conducted a case management conference, which was an early procedural hearing, of the suit earlier launched by Uralkali against the Administrators. During this hearing the court considered case management issues and settled the timetable for further steps up to trial, which was scheduled to take place between October and December 2020. Prior to trial, the parties to the proceedings will be required to disclose certain correspondence and other documents relating to the Bidding Process, and will exchange witness evidence in April 2020. Earlier in December 2018, two US district courts decided to compel members of the Racing Point consortium residing in US to provide documents and testimony, which may assist in support of Uralkali’s claim in the High Court in London. Uralkali’s legal claim against the Administrators highlights significant areas of concern regarding the conduct of the Bidding Process, including:

* Failure by the Administrators to determine the highest bid in the process — from Uralkali — as successful;
* Misrepresentations and lack of transparency in the process run by the Administrators;
* A flawed sales process which failed to achieve the maximization of sale proceeds for creditors, shareholders and other stakeholders.”

Uralkali believe they made a financial offer far above what Stroll and his consortium brought to the table. Teit statement continued "Uralkali set out an extremely generous offer to acquire the company’s business, assets and goodwill, which included a cash consideration of between £101.5 million and £122 million, depending on the specific structure of other bids, the offer proposed sufficient funding to satisfy the claims of all creditors in full (including assumed claims) and included an undertaking to provide significant working capital and a new investment program over a 5-year term to ensure the future success of Force India. Despite Uralkali’s generous offer, which we believe was the best bid on the table, the Administrators chose to enter into an exclusivity arrangement with a lower bidder and subsequently refused to reengage with Uralkali or any other bidders. Due to Uralkali’s concerns as to the Bidding Process, Uralkali had no option but to launch these proceedings and seek substantial damages. Uralkali intends to continue vigorous pursuit of its claims against the Administrator in the High Court in London.”

Mattia Binotto to give up all technical director responsibilities
Mattia Binotto is reportedly going to drop all technical director responsibilities in order to fully focus on his role as Ferrari team principal. Binotto who has effectively been performing a duel role at the Scuderia this season, will stand down as technical director and, in his place, will be a three-man team rather than one direct replacement. No official announcement has been made yet, but one could be on the way as we gear up to next weekend’s German Grand Prix at Hockenheim.

The likes of Enrico Cardile (chassis), David Sanchez (aerodynamics) and Corrado Iotti (engine) have been linked with becoming part of the new technical team that will report directly to Binotto. A further indication of a Ferrari reshuffle came recently with confirmation that former chief designer, Simone Resta, will be rejoining the team later this year from Alfa Romeo. Ferrari have so far refused to say what his official job title is, but it will not be technical director or chief designer. The reshuffle is predominantly with the 2020 season in mind as development continues to ramp up on the new car.

What I hope from 2021 F1 rules
There have been hearing whispers that F1 will reintroduce Ground Effect for the cars for the 2021 season, there are now a rumor doing the rounds that they will also get rid off high-degradation tyres, if these rumors are true it will be a god sent. These tyres have really fucked up F1 and meant that cars and drivers cannot race for long periods without their tyres giving up. Most teams can manage with a 1 stop race nowadays and with the rules saying you have to change tyres at least once nothing will really change in the pit-stop department,

The idea behind degrading tyres was that they would produce a big enough variation in lap time during their life that they help open overtaking opportunities between drivers. However, one of the consequences has been that the tyres are prone to overheating when a car is trying to attack a rival, and this hurts the racing. Lets hope that the FIA and Liberty Media get ride of them once and for all.

Now all they need to do is reintroduce active suspension and we can really go racing again, I'd also like them to go back to naturally aspirated V10's but I can't see them ever going down that road again :)
 
I have to say that the person at Haas who signed up with Rich and William Storey was a complete clot. The man is a chancer* and the company is a commercial pipsqueak.

There's no way Rich could meet obligations in the tens of millions of squids. A cursory stroll through the accounts would show that up. But anyone who enters a contract of that magnitude MUST carry out due diligence and actually visit the other partner, see the operation, look at the stocks, see some employees, even talk to customers, get references from banks and suppliers, and so on. You need some evidence that the promises and blandishments of the boss are true-ish.

Haas may have an open and shut case on paper, but expect some judicial mirth at the innocence of the larger party, and some strenuously rolling eyes beneath the horsehair wigs.


*This is a statement of opinion and NOT an assertion of fact. Errors and omissions excepted. Your mileage may very. Caveat emptor. Carpe diem. Tempus fugit. Leviosa!
 
$200 million up front to buy F1 franchise
Down among the undercurrents at Silverstone was talk of a couple of new teams, which are hoping to enter the sport in 2021. This makes sense from a strategic point of view, as it creates something of a level playing field for newcomers, but it is not yet clear how this will work from a governance standpoint as the entry requirements will probably be changed. Why? Because there is no point in having new teams if they get none of the benefits that the existing teams get and so tend to go out of business (as happened to all three of the teams which started in F1 in 2010).

The current rules require a $20 million bond, which is paid back when the team are operational. The idea of paying new teams prize money does not go down well with the existing teams as they will take a hit in their revenues, which isn’t really fair. The word is that new teams will be allowed to come in and will get immediate rights and benefits but will need to pay $200 million up front to get an entry. This money will be shared between the other teams, to stop them complaining. Thus if two new teams arrive, the existing 10 teams will get a budget boost of $40 million in 2021. In addition to their $80 million or so in prize money… The budget cap needs to come down and the revenues need to rise but in theory, at least, when these two things meet, the teams will suddenly have a value. At least, in a perfect world.

Very little is known about the two teams being planned but one is linked to the name Graeme Lowdon, who was involved with the Virgin/Manor/ Marussia operation, while the other name is that of longtime F1 wheeler-dealer Daniele Audetto. He is 76 and so is unlikely to be actively involved in the team but he seems to be doing the groundwork for someone, although there is no indication who. The only downside of this $200 million barrier is that it will be cheaper for newcomers to buy existing teams which are struggling, rather than trying to build a new one.

Haas rejected rumors Romain Grosjean will be replaced
Haas has rejected rumours Romain Grosjean will be stood down by the team before next week’s German Grand Prix. Several publications ran reports quoting an anonymous Reddit user stating Grosjean would be replaced by Mercedes junior driver Esteban Ocon at the Hockenheimring. However a Haas spokesperson confirmed the team will retain its usual driver line-up of Grosjean and Kevin Magnussen in Germany. The pair were strongly rebuked by team principal Guenther Steiner after they collided on the first lap of the British Grand Prix, forcing both cars out of the race. The collision came at an especially poor time for Haas as the team was running its cars in different configurations in a bid to understand its set-up problems with the VF-19.

Williams to sign new Mercedes contract in the near future
Williams is hoping to put pen to paper on a new Formula 1 engine deal with Mercedes in the near future, dismissing suggestions it could switch to a Renault supply. Williams has enjoyed a power unit supply from Mercedes since the start of the V6 hybrid era in 2014, scoring 15 podium finishes and one pole position in that period. Speculation emerged ahead of the British Grand Prix earlier this month that Williams was weighing up a switch to Renault engines at the end of its current contract, but deputy chief Claire Williams was quick to knock back the report, underlining the team's commitment to Mercedes.

"There’s a lot of speculation about Williams at the moment!" Williams joked, having also rejected a suggestion driver Robert Kubica could be replaced mid-season. "I saw the speculation. We aren’t talking to Renault. We’re talking to Mercedes as you probably expect. Those conversations are going well, and we hope to be able to conclude a new partnership with them going into 2021".

It should be remembered that Williams enjoyed its heyday in F1 while working with Renault through the 1990s, claiming five F1 constructors championships, as well as its most recent drivers title with Jacques Villeneuve in 1997.
 
I have to say that the person at Haas who signed up with Rich and William Storey was a complete clot. The man is a chancer* and the company is a commercial pipsqueak.

There's no way Rich could meet obligations in the tens of millions of squids. A cursory stroll through the accounts would show that up. But anyone who enters a contract of that magnitude MUST carry out due diligence and actually visit the other partner, see the operation, look at the stocks, see some employees, even talk to customers, get references from banks and suppliers, and so on. You need some evidence that the promises and blandishments of the boss are true-ish.

Haas may have an open and shut case on paper, but expect some judicial mirth at the innocence of the larger party, and some strenuously rolling eyes beneath the horsehair wigs.


*This is a statement of opinion and NOT an assertion of fact. Errors and omissions excepted. Your mileage may very. Caveat emptor. Carpe diem. Tempus fugit. Leviosa!
The thing is looking at what has gone on in the background, it appears William Storey (rather than Rich Energy) is the money behind the finance and not Rich Energy, I have no idea how much Storey is worth, but it seems that he gave a personal guarantee and that was underwritten by his bank. It appears that he made millions by investing in a tobacco farm in Zimbabwe when he was working in the country, The story goes [he spotted that a flood of Chinese businessmen were descending on the country and wondered why. He soon discovered that the value of land had been pushed artificially low because of political strife around controversial land reforms. A farmer he knew had a farm which had been worth $30m but was only worth $2m even though the amount of money being earned from the sale of tobacco was vastly more than that, Storey invested in the farm, ownership wasn’t possible because of the reforms which stated landowners had to be Zimbabwean and has essentially funded Rich Energy by “cashing in his chips” in the venture.]

Looking back at a post I made in the 2018 F1 thread
When Rich Energy was bidding to buy Force India last summer, it was suggested that the brand, fronted by William Storey, was supported by British entrepreneurs David Gold and David Sullivan. I think they made their money in porn but nowadays own West Ham United. There is no obvious link between the parties, apart from the fact that Rich Energy is a sponsor of West Ham's ladies team. Having said that there must be money behind Storey if Haas has agreed a deal, as normally announcements would not be made without money changing hands.
I wonder if they still have an interest in Rich Energy, are they the real money behind Storey?

Storey is listed as an officer of six companies in the Companies House registry, and looking into them gives some good context for understanding Rich Energy. Three companies are listed as active: Rich Energy Racing, Rich Energy and Wise Guy Boxing. The others are Tryfan Technologies, Tryfan LED and Danieli Style, these are listed as dissolved. Many haven’t done well monetarily, and have been involuntarily removed from the registry or wound up as a result of debts. It’s also worth noting that in all but the Rich Energy Racing filings, where his occupation is registered “CEO,” Storey is listed as a computer consultant.

Other doggie F1 deals
Formula One is no stranger to unconventional sponsors. Belgian financier Jean-Pierre Van Rossem stunned the world with the “groundbreaking” Moneytron machine, which he claimed was a supercomputer that could supposedly predict stock market trends. Moneytron sponsored the Onyx F1 team, only for the thing to turn out to be a scam. There was T-Minus of Nigerian Prince fame and Leyton House. There was the Andrea Moda Formula team, disqualified for being too dangerous before owner Andrea Sassetti was arrested for forging auto part invoices. Sulaiman Al-Kehaimi posed as a Saudi prince and promised to purchase a huge stake in the struggling Tyrrell Racing team before being arrested as a fraud. While he was acquitted, the struggling Tyrrell eventually succumbed to the loss of a stable financial backing.

It like Bernie never left :facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm:
 
the sport is over regulated i will give him that

but he also mentions that one car is dominating

sort of an inbuilt hazard at the pinnacle of Motorsport.

how do you sort even with a budget cap


it involves car manufactures
 
I do hope you not saying i'm a ferrari fan

first of their drivers i have not disliked whilst they were driving for the red car is leclerc

:hmm:

edit to add i found Vettel more annoying at redbull
 
Back
Top Bottom