Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

F1 2016

Could Apple Inc be about to buy into F1
This is a rumor that can be clearly traced back to just one source, so currently should be taken with a pinch of salt. Joe Saward who has been an F1 journalist for many years has reported the following and others have started to run with it.

Whispers from Princes Gate, home of the Formula One group, that there is another round of intensive due diligence going on, which suggests that there is another serious bidder emerging in the process of selling the sport. The whisper is that the latest bidder is Apple Inc., which is a company with $161 billion in net cash at the moment, despite having spent $117 billion on share repurchases and $46 billion on dividends in recent years. Apple doesn’t typically make big purchases but usually buys small business and incorporates the technology into its products but the viewing habits of the world are changing, with traditional broadcasters, cable and satellite networks under threat from “over-the-top” content providers. This basically means the delivery of content via the Internet, without requiring users to subscribe to a traditional cable or satellite pay-TV service. This has led to a gold rush of companies moving into streaming and looking for the most attractive content to bring in customers. Apple TV is one of the most popular streaming devices around and has Sling TV, a content-driven hub for sports fans and television viewers, providing consumers with the opportunity to watch their favourite shows and channels live and on-demand, with one simple registration at a nice low price. There is also the possibility of what is called a la carte television, where you pay for what you order. Going direct to consumer is a way to multiply revenues by cutting out the middle men (i.e. the TV channels) and owning the content is thus desirable. It should also be remembered that Apple is on the verge of launching into the world’s automotive markets, with an electric car that remains a secret, although it is hard to hide such a project when you hire more than a thousand engineers to work on it. The Apple car is expected to appear by 2020. Thus, there are three elements that would make the purchase of F1 a logical step for Apple. It can afford it, it can boost sales of Apple TVs and get people thinking about Apple in relation to cars. Strangely enough, no-one is willing to confirm or deny the stories.

In other news

Sauber are reported to be about to make an announcement about a new financial backer to save the team.

Mercedes have decided not to appeal the Radio ruling by the Silverstone stewards.

Haas have joined Red Bull in calling for the Halo device not to be used from 2017.

Interesting debate of the radio today about Massa replacing Palmer at Renault, apparently it could all come down to Petrobras sponsorship.
 
Apple and F1
My first thought when I read Apple Inc. could be about to buy formula 1 was that the silly season had come early, but maybe it isn't such a stupid idea. Clearly Apple don't need to buy it for advertising reason as they are the biggest company in the world when it comes to smart phones and tablets but they are moving into other markets such as cars and TV set top boxes, so F1 could be a good fit for a company that is moving in that direction.

The Apple car isn't expected to be on the market until 2020. F1 is right at the forefront when it comes to hybrid power-units and R&D is extremely expensive, so F1 would offer Apple access to massive amounts of technology and inside information possibly saving them a great deal of money in the area of R&D. Clearly until we see their car we will not have any idea, if and to what extent F1 technology is used in such a car, but you can be sure if they have access to technology they will use it.

Apple TV is a very different kettle of fish and the purchase of formula 1 could have lots of advantages for the company as their TV service hasn't really taken off worldwide. Internet TV and set top watching is growing fast, Netflex, Sky and other TV providers are making a la carte TV a big deal and it is the way many people want to watch, so why wouldn't Apple TV want a bigger share of the market? Today Apple TV has around 25 million customers who have brought the set top box. Formula 1 has over 600 million viewers (down from a high of 800 million) but its pay to view service hasn't really been very successful and viewer figures are dropping, but what if Apple did buy F1 and offered it to its customers for free?

How else could Apple gets its investment back? Well if Apple did allow F1 races free to air for its Apple TV customers it would only need 10% of F1 viewers to buy their set top boxes at $200 to recoup its original $8 billion investment, they could also sell races over the internet to viewers at a very low price and as Apple has a massive following they could bring in millions of new viewers, Internet formula 1 is a market that is currently untapped so is a market open to be exploited.

It is reported that Apple has around $161 billion cash reserves, so buying F1 for $8 billion isn't really a very big purchase and it also a very profitable business. CVC make around $900 million a year from formula 1 and while it is true that most of that money goes in debt repayment, that is only because CVC took massive loans against their purchase of F1 to get their profit out early in the deal, it is still the most profitable investment for CVC shareholders.

So maybe it isn't such a silly story after all

Has Lewis Hamilton had a brain wave
Lewis Hamilton has suggested to Mercedes he takes one double penalty at a grand prix to build a pool of engines to get him through the 2016 Formula 1 season. Drivers who have incurred multiple penalties simply drop to the back of the grid after the mid-2015 rules tweak, so Mercedes could choose to hand Hamilton two fresh power units at the same time to create a pool of components to see him to the end of the year.

"That's a solution I've come up with myself," said Hamilton of the 'component pool' plan. "That would definitely be something that could be done, I'm definitely going to be taking another engine. It's a question of when I take it, the strategists will be looking at all the races and saying 'This is a track where it is easier to overtake', ultimately it's my decision because I'm the one who actually knows where I'll be able to do the best job from last place. So I have to be strategic in how I decide that, but yeah, it would be nice to get a few engines in the pool at the same time. I hope at some stage I'm able to get some fresh ones, but the one I'm driving right now, hopefully that will hold together for as long as possible".

It sounds like a great plan and I'm not sure what the FIA could do about it :)
 
The Sauber Group has been sold
Sauber Holding AG the parent company of the Sauber group has been brought by Longbow Finance SA, the F1 team will continue to use the Sauber name, it is also reported that Peter Sauber will retire from all functions with-in the group. Monisha Kaltenborn, who owned 30 percent of the F1 team will continue to lead the company as CEO and Team Principal and will remain on the board.

There is very little known about Longbow Finance SA or who it may represent. It has been making investments for 20 years. It is a company that manages the money of others, investing in shares, securities, real estate and other activities.

Are Ferrari about to make changes?

Two interesting reports in the Italian press. The first is that the Ferrari president Sergio Marchionne has bypassed team principal Maurizio Arrivabene and spoken directly to a number of top engineers at the team about what the current problems are and how they can be fixed. If this is really the case it appears to undermine the team principals position somewhat. Could this be an indication that Maurizio Arrivabene is on his way out or are the press just getting excited over nothing, I guess time will tell.

The 2nd story is that Ferrari have been in talks with Ross Brawn, the report claims that Ferrari have approached Brawn to join the team as a consultant. Interestingly Martin Brundle spoke to Ross and the interview was shown during the last race weekend, Brawn clearly said "never say never" but when asked about Ferrari's problems he didn't talk about team principal Maurizio Arrivabene, he chose to speak about James Allison (who I believe should be running the team).

He said "They need a quiet approach, so I think it's a quiet approach with the necessary planning and resource. They've got some very good people there -James Allison is excellent. If they give him the resources and give him the time and put the infrastructure around him, with great drivers, they'll get results", he also made the point that he [Brawn] was able to concentrate on the engineering and the racing side, because he had good people around him like Todt and Montezemelo to deal with all the other stuff (with the benefit of hindsight I wonder if that was a "gentle swipe" at the top brass of the team).

With the new aerodynamic regulations coming into force for 2017 Ferrari need to make changes soon, if indeed they are going to make changes, if they leave it too late they will be on the back foot playing catch-up again. Red Bull came to dominance after big regulations changes in 2009 and then Mercedes did the same after the big power-unit regulation changes. 2017 will again see radical aerodynamic regulation changes and the team that makes the most of them is likely to dominate for a couple of seasons.

Bernie piles the pressure on Monza
It is being reported that Bernie has agreed terms with Imola to hold the Italian GP, but while the management of the Imola circuit have signed the contract, Bernie is unable to do so without the agreement of the Italian automobile club. He is reported in the Italian press as saying "the problems with Monza are "political", and that if a deal with Imola falls through, we will have to say 'goodbye' to F1 in Italy".

The boss of the Italian automobile club, Angelo Sticchi Damiani has answered Bernie saying "those political hurdles have now been cleared. There are now no obstacles for the Monza GP. Next week a binding offer will be presented to FOM. We hope a conclusion can be reached quickly".

The Italian automobile club has so much power because they provide much of the funding for the race and are the deal maker for the politicians and public funding.

Lotus Formula 1 lost £57million in 2015

The recently released accounts for Lotus F1 show a staggering increase in losses for the team just prior to them being taken over by Renault for the price of just £1. Accounts to the end of December 2015 show the team lost £56.994 million, that is a massive increase on the previous year where the team made losses of £5.753 million. It seems that much of the problem for Lotus was a massive reduction in sponsorship money with the team loosing around £36.5 million worth of sponsorship, while their operating costs increased.
 
Hungarian GP: Drivers face return-to-pit instruction under new radio rules

Even tighter radio rules. Any information given about fixing problems means the car must return to the pit.

I can understand the thinking, but I always enjoyed the radio banter.

I mean, conversations between the team and Kimi - comedy gold.

Or any team telling a driver to let a team-mate past? Put another 50p in the bleep machine.

I thought the radio chat made it more entertaining, especially when we find out a driver has a problem and the other cars react to that.

:thumbs: to drama.
 
Hungarian GP this weekend. Timings are (UK):

Friday 22 July
FP1 - 09.00
FP2 - 13.00

Saturday 23 July
FP3 - 10.00
Qual - 13.00

Sunday 24 July
Race - 13.00

:cool:
 
The radio ban
The radio ban is just another example of F1 trying to fix a problem that doesn't really exist, I don't fully agree with the rules but if they are the rules everyone has to put up with them. I understand that they were put in place to try to ensure that the cars are driven solely by the driver and unaided by the crew, but it is like sending someone into space and telling them that if they have a problem they need to sort it out without the help of NASA or having a manual to hand.

The point behind all this, is that the FIA believe the cars are becoming to complected and don't really need all the control systems to go racing and they are wanting the teams to simplify the cars, something they have been wanting for years. that is why they banned all the driver aids.

The FIA have issued a note if instruction to all teams that basically says; any information passed from the team to the driver must be for the sole purpose of mitigating loss of function of a sensor, actuator or controller whose degradation or failure was not detected and handled by the onboard software. It will be the responsibility of any team giving any such instruction to satisfy the FIA technical delegate that this was the case and that any new setting chosen in this way did not enhance the performance of the car beyond that prior to the loss of function" and as mentioned above, "any message informing a driver of a car problem must include an irreversible instruction to return to the pits to rectify the problem or to retire".

The Hungaroring not Mercedes best track

Mercedes have yet to win at the Hungaroring since the new V6 turbo power-units have been in place, their last win here was Lewis in 2013, he also won in 2009 for McLaren. In 2014 it was Red Bull and 2015 Ferrari, Jenson also won here in 2006 with a Honda engine, having started from 14th place on the grid :eek: Rosberg has never finished on the podium here, so he will be looking to get that monkey off his back.

It isn't one of the faster circuits and so mechanical grip rather than down-force will play a big part in the racing as corner speed is low compared to many other tracks, it is also one of the harder tracks to overtake, so DRS will play a big part in any overtaking. Tyre management is very important here and the team that manages them best is likely to win the race.

I have a feeling that this could be Red Bulls race and a 2nd win for Verstappen, but I hope Lewis proves me wrong. The weather looks good except for Friday afternoon where there could be rain, the track temperature could be as high as last years race when it was 55C whitch could produce tyre issues for some teams.
 
Okay, the new radio rule requires cars to return to the pits if they get technical help.

This means that a driver that comes into the pit lane can get all the technical advice he needs as soon as he passes the pit limit line. He doesn't have to stop.

So he can get a a 10+ second technical helpline.

Which, in my experience, means an unintelligible voice against a background of a thousand other conversations asking if it's plugged in at the wall.

:p
 
Driver: I have a big problem with my gearbox...
Team radio: Okay, box,box, box
*pit lane*
Team radio: Welcome to the Mercedes F1 helpline.
Driver: I can't get 7th gear...
Team radio: Your radio message is important to us...
Driver What do I fucking do?
Team radio:... and may be recorded for training and security purposes...
Driver: For fucks sake, what...
*pit lane limit*
Driver... do I do about 7th gear?
Team radio: Okay, box, box, box...
 
Good morning all :)
Raining cats and dogs at the circuit atm. Qualifying might be delayed.
Just goes to show how shit the long range weather-forecast is, they said rain Friday 2nd practice then hot weather for the rest of the weekend :)
 
Greetings, all.

The helicopter shot looked especially grim.

It looks set in for a while.

Reminds me of childhood holiday days in the west of Ireland. I instinctively reach for my water wings.
 
Looking at a rule change apparently, so that that when there's a safety car start, when it's safe to get going, there is a normal standing start. Sounds like a good idea.
 
Sounds like Red Bull are going to the stewards over Nico's lap

Edit, Mercedes say no indication of appeal to stewards, yet
 
Back
Top Bottom