Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Ex-Italian President: Intel Agencies Know 9/11 An Inside Job

Status
Not open for further replies.
jæd said:
Go on then... Where the insults the Editor made according to # 296...? :confused:

For instance....

editor said:
..and still desperate for attention too.

Grow up, little boy.


...and if you would frequent these types of threads more often you'd see many more examples.
 
DrRingDing said:
...and if you would frequent these types of threads more often you'd see many more examples.

Perhaps if you didn't post up conspiraloonery, and have goes against people like BK then people wouldn't think you were a kid. Just a thought. :rolleyes:
 
editor said:
You mean like you posting that "the former Italian Prez has stated that it is common knowledge amongst governments that 9/11 was an inside job" yet failing spectacularly to back up that wild claim in any meaningful way at all?

What on earth are you talking about? This claim [that a former president has said as such] has been completely backed up.
 
Badger Kitten said:
Given the fact that anyone can click back and review your posts over the last 11 pages, that is quite spectacular chutzpah from you.
Oh good, you're back.

I leant on an extremely busy friend who's just had a second child to provide you with a translation of the article you wanted. I have not yet received any thanks from you about it, why not?
 
Jazzz said:
What on earth are you talking about? This claim [that a former president has said as such] has been completely backed up.
So you can list the governments where the belief that "9/11 was an inside job" is "common knowledge," then?

Great! Which ones are they please?

*awaits industrial wriggle
 
Jazzz said:
Oh good, you're back.

I leant on an extremely busy friend who's just had a second child to provide you with a translation of the article you wanted. I have not yet received any thanks from you about it, why not?

Nobody gives a shit, about it...? :confused: :rolleyes:
 
jæd said:
Nobody gives a shit, about it...? :confused: :rolleyes:
If they don't, what the fuck are they doing on the thread?

Anyway I suggest you don't get in the way, I was talking to Badger Kitten who I presume can conduct herself a bit better
 
jæd said:
Perhaps if you didn't post up conspiraloonery, and have goes against people like BK then people wouldn't think you were a kid. Just a thought. :rolleyes:

BK has the politics of a child, a rather spoilt one at that.

The same beliefs that the editor promotes on this topic are too innocent and niave for a man of his age.
 
Jazzz said:
I leant on an extremely busy friend who's just had a second child to provide you with a translation of the article you wanted. I have not yet received any thanks from you about it, why not?

...because it doesn't back up her tedious bourgeois agenda.
 
Originally Posted by Jazzz
Oh good, you're back.

I leant on an extremely busy friend who's just had a second child to provide you with a translation of the article you wanted. I have not yet received any thanks from you about it, why not?



Dear Jazzz

I didn't ask you personally to ask a busy friend with a child to translate the article. I asked if anyone reading could come to the thread and have a look.

I doubt you asked them to do it because you were terribly anxious that Badger Kitten should not be disappointed in having a translation of the article immediately. I think it more likely that you asked your friend ( whom you describe, from memory as being sympathetic to ''9/11 Truth'') to look at it because you yourself wanted to participate on the thread. Perhaps I am uncharitable.

However, please pass on my regards to your pal

Regards

BK
 
Jazzz, thank you so much for leaning on an extremely busy friend who's just had a second child. I for one appraciate you doing that. I am forever in your debt.
 
Considering there was a number of people denying the article said what it does Dr Jazzz done well to get it translated.

I got the gist of it from an Italian mate but he's too much of a stoner to hassle him for a whole translation.
 
DrRingDing said:
Considering there was a number of people denying the article said what it does Dr Jazzz done well to get it translated.

I got the gist of it from an Italian mate but he's too much of a stoner to hassle him for a whole translation.

It's pretty much the same translation that already existed all over the web.
 
butchersapron said:
It's pretty much the same translation that already existed all over the web.

Exactly, but people here didn't want to accept any of those translations.

It just so happened not to fit in with their arguement. Funny that.
 
DrRingDing said:
I'd be careful if I were you. Your on thin ice sonny.

Any more FAQ busting personal insults and you'll facing a banning.

You must have been sniffing dog jism again, or your addled grey matter would have noted that your insults have been somewhat more persistent and personal.

But I'm sure you already knew that.
 
Dr RingDing, if I may ask you three brief questions, at the risk of derailing this thread for a moment? What's your position on detention without charge for longer than 28 days? And on the right to protest and assemble outside Parliamament? And are you in sympathy with the positions expressed by Liberty, the Human Rights Orgnisation?
 
Badger Kitten said:
Dr RingDing, if I may ask you three brief questions, at the risk of derailing this thread for a moment? What's your position on detention without charge for longer than 28 days?

It's a piss take.
 
DrRingDing said:
Exactly, but people here didn't want to accept any of those translations.

It just so happened not to fit in with their arguement. Funny that.

Exactly what though? The translations don't fit in with peoples arguments whether the poor recovering person that jazz went out of his way to hassle came up with the same translation or not. Because, simply, Cossiga is not reliable and the cases built on this claim of his mean nothing.
 
butchersapron said:
Cossiga is not reliable and the cases built on this claim of his mean nothing.

Nobody in who's been related to bourgeois politics, security services etc is reliable.

It just so happens that in Italy things are a bit more explicit and polarised. Here the general consensus is that MI5/6 are trustworthy.
 
DrRingDing said:
Nobody in who's been related to bourgeois politics, security services etc is reliable.

It just so happens that in Italy things are a bit more explicit and polarised. Here the general consensus is that MI5/6 are trustworthy.

What does this mean? Italy, and Cossiga to the fore, has the worst history of secret state activity in western europe, activity that the state, again, with Cossiga to the fore, has gone to very great lengths to cover up. What's 'more explicit'? And what does it have to do with MI5/MI6?
 
I am quite interested how those who spend a great deal of energy fervently claiming that all politicians lie, and the mainstream media is stuffed full of conformiton propoganda should suddently have so much time for erm, an ex-politician speaking out in the MSM.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom