Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Ex-Italian President: Intel Agencies Know 9/11 An Inside Job

Status
Not open for further replies.
DrRingDing said:
I only became abusive with BK when she threw abuse at me.

Read the thread Spunky then you won't be made to look such a fool.

you're as mad as Jazzz
 
If you're going to start a thread with a comment like this:

DrRingDing said:
Well, well, well. Let's see our resident conformitons wiggle out of this one :D

You have to be prepared for a thread that's probably going to descend into name-calling and become very confrontational from the outset IMO. You're throwing around insults before anyone has even posted on here yet!
 
Augie March said:
You have to be prepared for a thread that's probably going to descend into name-calling and become very confrontational from the outset IMO. You're throwing around insults before anyone has even posted on here yet!

This is what happens everytime. There's no point trying to have a reasonable discussion with the resident ruling conformitons as they're unwilling to take into account any evidence that doesn't fit neatly with their views.
 
DrRingDing said:
This is what happens everytime. There's no point trying to have a reasonable discussion with the resident ruling conformitons as they're unwilling to take into account any evidence that doesn't fit neatly with their views.

Did you present some new 'evidence'?
 
DrRingDing said:
This is what happens everytime. There's no point trying to have a reasonable discussion with the resident ruling conformitons as they're unwilling to take into account any evidence that doesn't fit neatly with their views.

Well if that's how you feel why bother posting up a thread in which straight from the off you're goading anyone you think will probably disagree with you.

It just smacks of being overly childish and attention-seeking.
 
Augie March said:
Well if that's how you feel why bother posting up a thread in which straight from the off you're goading anyone you think will probably disagree with you.

It just smacks of being overly childish and attention-seeking.

You don't really understand the history of the ongoing arguement.

It's just willy waving & bitch slapping all the way.

I don't write the rules.
 
DrRingDing said:
I'm not falling for that one.

Cossiga's statement was worthy of comment. That's all I'm saying.

If only it was all you said. It wasn't though was it?

Go back and read the first page.

I'll wait for your apology.
 
DrRingDing said:
You don't really understand the history of the ongoing arguement.

It's just willy waving & bitch slapping all the way.

I don't write the rules.

Oh ok then, don't let me stop you, carry on with the silliness. I'm sure it's probably been going on for years now anyway.
 
Augie March said:
Oh ok then, don't let me stop you, carry on with the silliness. I'm sure it's probably been going on for years now anyway.
It's over. FM has just perma-banned him for "consistent abuse."
 
editor said:
It's over. FM has just perma-banned him for "consistent abuse."

Oh well. I think after reading that horrible mock thread he did about Passdout's son a while back and his silliness on this thread, can't say I'm gonna miss him.
 
FridgeMagnet said:
You are the one who took it upon yourself to bother a busy friend with a child, going far over any request made here and almost certainly for yourself anyway (you didn't want a translation?) and now are demanding repeatedly that your effort and the sacrifice of your friend's time be properly recognised. That _is_ creepy if actually meant, I'm afraid, although actually I think it's just an attempt at pointscoring.

I had to take my granny off oxygen to help me properly compose the above paragraph, incidentally. Thus I expect the proper level of thanks, defined as "slightly more thanks than you actually give".
I didn't need a translation, no - I was quite happy to trust the comments as they had been reported.

However, if you remember, BK and others cast doubt as to whether they had been, and if the original article actually said something quite different. And BK asked for a translation.

So I went and got one. Now if someone (whether arguing for or against me) went to some trouble like that on my behalf, I would certainly thank them, also if it corrected any misconceptions I had had, I would acknowledge the correction.

You can find an example of that with Bob_the_Losts' link on the other thread, where he corrected me about heat conduction modelling in the NIST fire model.

However it's noticeable that there's been a stony silence which greeted the translation I provided - this shows that people here don't want to be involved in a discussion where we help each form conclusions - just a silly piece of polemic willy-waving. And it would seem we have to include BK, for all her apparent high-mindedness, in that category.

It's very noticeable how little posters have to say about Cossiga's remarks, isn't it?
 
FridgeMagnet said:
There hasn't been in the slightest a silence. There have been a bunch of people saying "yeah, and?"
So do you have any possible idea why they didn't say that to start with, and took the line his words were being misreported?
 
Jazzz said:
So do you have any possible idea why they didn't say that to start with, and took the line his words were being misreported?

Because the 9/11 "truth" people constantly misreport and lie? Just a guess, like.
 
Jazzz said:
So do you have any possible idea why they didn't say that to start with, and took the line his words were being misreported?
That sentence is not connected with actual arguments, please rephrase.
 
Jazzz said:
So do you have any possible idea why they didn't say that to start with, and took the line his words were being misreported?
Perhaps that would be something to do with the long, long, looong history of false claims, fact-free bullshit and wild accusations made by 9/11 conspiracy fans like yourself?

Seeing as you've failed to add any substantive weight to Cossiga's claims or list the governments where it's ""common knowledge" that "9/11 was an inside job," there's not much to discuss really.
 
Badger Kitten said:
Given the fact that anyone can click back and review your posts over the last 11 pages, that is quite spectacular chutzpah from you.

I've still to read the rest of this thread, but I can't imagine that dringy will be able to find any way to avoid being proved a "spectacular chutzpah".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom