Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

England cricket, 2019-20 winter tours

One good thing to come out of the match was the commentators discussing the documentary Free Solo during a period of play when not much was happening. I watched the film the next day. It's a low budget, high grossing, high tension belter. Highly recommended.
 
Batting-wise, Denly and Stokes come out of it with some credit, but that's about it. Pope played two horrible shots, betraying a lack of mental discipline. Root? :(

Root's batting is shot. The choice as I see it is keep him as captain for another year until he doesn't even warrant a place in the team, or give the captaincy to someone else and give him the chance to find his feet again as a specialist batsman.
 
One good thing to come out of the match was the commentators discussing the documentary Free Solo during a period of play when not much was happening. I watched the film the next day. It's a low budget, high grossing, high tension belter. Highly recommended.

Seen it twice, great doc film. Much better than the England cricket team. You can throw a load of money at a team but all you get are overpaid average players.
 
Root's batting is shot. The choice as I see it is keep him as captain for another year until he doesn't even warrant a place in the team, or give the captaincy to someone else and give him the chance to find his feet again as a specialist batsman.
They need to find a way to take the captaincy off him before South Africa. Thing is, he's not a very good captain either, tbh.
 
Seen it twice, great doc film. Much better than the England cricket team. You can throw a load of money at a team but all you get are overpaid average players.
Yeah, totally. To give this series some financial context, England's players are on approximately five times more money than New Zealand's players.
 
Seen it twice, great doc film. Much better than the England cricket team. You can throw a load of money at a team but all you get are overpaid average players.
Talking of sports documentaries, and more in keeping with this thread, The Edge is good if you haven't seen it. This is the English cricket documentary covering the Andy Flower era. The narration from the usually excellent Toby Jones is a bit overbearing early on, but you'll feel some love for Trotty by the end of the film.
 
So we see the importance England attach to wicketkeeping. Buttler injured so Pope comes in after just five first class games as keeper. No Leach, so he won't be exposed by standing up much, at least. Do England actually have a clue what they're doing, though? Why not have a reserve keeper? Just makes no sense.
 
Another Dharmasena clanger. That was always outside leg.

The non-striking batsman actually called the review on that one. After about half a second.
 
Last edited:
Stokes not had a bowl yet. Curran's so gentle, it's swinging almost right from the hand, Graham Gooch-style. Stokes might have been effective in muggy, swinging conditions.
 
Pope missed most of last season with a dislocated shoulder. Not good to have a makeshift keeper diving about on a newly mended bit of skeleton.
 
Haven't seen any of it but I've caught the back end of two news reports talking up an England win ("we need to bat once and bat big" - yeah, go on then Stuart). So I checked the score. WTF? That's staring defeat down the barrel isn't it? Where are these magic runs going to come from?
 
Most worrying thing is that England looked toothless (even Archer) following a decent first hour, then NZ come on to bowl and suddenly it's doing plenty. I know speed isn't everything, and NZ aren't the quickest, but being at your top speed, whatever that may be, is important. England haven't been, either here or in the first test. They've blatantly been misusing Archer, the effects of last week probably playing their part in his speeds here. And I still don't think Sam Curran is a test bowler. To cut it at under 80 mph you've got to be rather special - Mohammed Asif-style. Curran doesn't have the skills of Mohammed Asif.
 
Well that's better. Still a match-saving performance than a match winning one because we aren't getting a lead on 1st innings. And they'll still have to bat again. But better. Joe Root - who knew?
 
Haven't seen any of it but I've caught the back end of two news reports talking up an England win ("we need to bat once and bat big" - yeah, go on then Stuart). So I checked the score. WTF? That's staring defeat down the barrel isn't it? Where are these magic runs going to come from?

Joe Root, as it turns out.
 
So a slightly shambolic end, first Pope then Denly dropping Williamson. Pope put down two chances in the game, one tough but gettable by a keeper with better technique, the other a very bad miss.

Root making positive noises in public about being proud of the team. I'm getting a bit fed up with this relentless positivity in the face of mediocre performances. Bairstow was being touted as one of the best batsmen in the world the other week. No, he isn't. That's why is record is as it is.

I know why these noises are made, but I'd like to hear some realism in there - eg Pope as keeper didn't cut it, mistake to try it sorry; praise Pope for his application in second test, but criticise him for his part in the defeat in the first; be disappointed, first and foremost, by a series defeat in which you were outplayed. There are more negatives than positives from this tour - be honest about that. Series defeat was due to batting deficiencies, and won't even come near to a series win without finding a way to be more penetrating with the ball. That's the honest truth.
 
Good grief.



Plus first calendar year since 1999 without a test series victory. Yeah, that went well.

At least they’re looking at bringing back Keaton for Sri Lanka. I think it’s Jennings but it might be Buster.
 
To be fair to Denly:

1. it wouldn't have made any difference to the match outcome
2. He can catch...
 
So a slightly shambolic end, first Pope then Denly dropping Williamson. Pope put down two chances in the game, one tough but gettable by a keeper with better technique, the other a very bad miss.

Root making positive noises in public about being proud of the team. I'm getting a bit fed up with this relentless positivity in the face of mediocre performances. Bairstow was being touted as one of the best batsmen in the world the other week. No, he isn't. That's why is record is as it is.

I know why these noises are made, but I'd like to hear some realism in there - eg Pope as keeper didn't cut it, mistake to try it sorry; praise Pope for his application in second test, but criticise him for his part in the defeat in the first; be disappointed, first and foremost, by a series defeat in which you were outplayed. There are more negatives than positives from this tour - be honest about that. Series defeat was due to batting deficiencies, and won't even come near to a series win without finding a way to be more penetrating with the ball. That's the honest truth.

I think what the Pope thing shows is them not taking the series seriously enough tbh. It's not that they see him as a future keeper (so in a sense it doesn't really matter if he wasn't quite up to it), it's more 'well he'll do at a pinch, it's only two tests in NZ.'
 
I think what the Pope thing shows is them not taking the series seriously enough tbh. It's not that they see him as a future keeper (so in a sense it doesn't really matter if he wasn't quite up to it), it's more 'well he'll do at a pinch, it's only two tests in NZ.'

Whilst I agree that all tests at this point should be seen as vital opportunities to rebuild the side for the long term, these two-test tours are shite. I would have loved to see a proper series in New Zealand, and not just because antipodean winter tours are great for insomniac cricket fans like me.
 
Back
Top Bottom