lets face it, pageantry was what people had before they invented light entertainment stars. No, back in the olden days all you had was public executions and pageantryI've been sayhing for a while that celeb and pic driven liberalism in 2017 increasingly resembles monarchism, glad to see these things actually becoming basically indistinguishable.
And Mystery Plays.lets face it, pageantry was what people had before they invented light entertainment stars. No, back in the olden days all you had was public executions and pageantry
oh yeah there was the Passion, wheeled out to get the pogroms onAnd Mystery Plays.
You want to see the Daily Mail comments, it's political incorrectness gorn mad!Tell you one thing, I bet the Tories were fucking livid when they saw her hat.
lets face it, pageantry was what people had before they invented light entertainment stars. No, back in the olden days all you had was public executions and pageantry
And Mystery Plays.
oh yeah there was the Passion, wheeled out to get the pogroms on
oh yeah there was the Passion, wheeled out to get the pogroms on
that is messed up. Fake news lol. Still, the protocols are a sterling example of fake news as propagated by someone who would happy to write for brietbart...Another one I just learned about (ive just been reading a book about the origins of the blood libel) is 'relic tours'
basically the saints bones would would get wheeled around for a trip around to different places, and in the case of blood libel shit be accompanied with fiery speeches about jews. but people would come along with absurdly exaggerated injuries and touch the relics and then look like they were 'cured' in order to encourage other people to think it could cure them. just totally fucked up, to the extent that even popes and bishops criticised it at the time
You've got to have a short memory indeed.
And bear baiting.
What I meant (hopefully obviously) is during their time as leader. Tory leaders nearly always manage to get at least one overall majority at a GE, which is perplexing in itself. Not Meh though.
umm
William Hague (lost 2001 election), Ian Duncan Shitwit (didn't last long enough - as leader - for a general election) and Michael Howard (lost 2005 election) were tory leaders who never won a general election or became PM in recentish memory
and Alec Douglas-Home (became 'unelected' PM when Harold MacMillan resigned part way through a parliament, then lost 1964 general election)
Don't forget, badger baiting, dog fighting and something that may have a bit of a comeback in the Tory party in weeks to come 'cock fighting'
Don't forget, badger baiting, dog fighting and something that may have a bit of a comeback in the Tory party in weeks to come 'cock fighting'
But this doesn't apply to Andrew Bonar Law who ended up winning a majority in the following election in 1922. He then resigned a year later and his successor called a snap general election and lost his majority. So a completely different situation.What I meant (hopefully obviously) is during their time as leader. Tory leaders nearly always manage to get at least one overall majority at a GE, which is perplexing in itself. Not Meh though.
i think voters will find that policy otterly unacceptableI will not rest until we leglise otter hunting again, the sleek, cute, fish easting endangered species bastards
I found this hat thing astonishing. First of all, let's imagine the Queen was making a statement. Why are you cheering that? The unelected head of state, there by heredity, sexist heredity, and the combined Supreme Governor of the Church of England and supposed source of the Crown-in-Parliament phenomenon which supposedly imbues legitimacy and sovereignty and symbolises the fused powers of executive and legislature, is your idea of a rebel? She symbolises a state which doesn't get its sovereignty from the people, but from her. And she heads the established religion. Which has Lords Spiritual in the higher chamber as of right. Not by coincidence. Not who just happen to be bishops and are now also lords. But who are there because the CofE gets Lords by right. And we pay this monarch to live in palaces and own the swans and dolphins. And this you choose as your champion? Astonishing.I've been sayhing for a while that celeb and pic driven liberalism in 2017 increasingly resembles monarchism, glad to see these things actually becoming basically indistinguishable.
you're a hatI found this hat thing astonishing. First of all, let's imagine the Queen was making a statement. Why are you cheering that? The unelected head of state, there by heredity, sexist heredity, and the combined Supreme Governor of the Church of England and supposed source of the Crown-in-Parliament phenomenon which supposedly imbues legitimacy and sovereignty and symbolises the fused powers of executive and legislature, is your idea of a rebel? She symbolises a state which doesn't get its sovereignty from the people, but from her. And she heads the established religion. Which has Lords Spiritual in the higher chamber as of right. Not by coincidence. Not who just happen to be bishops and are now also lords. But who are there because the CofE gets Lords by right. And we pay this monarch to live in palaces and own the swans and dolphins. And this you choose as your champion? Astonishing.
Secondly, it was a blue and yellow hat, ffs. It takes a real leap to see it as a flag. It's a hat with flowers on. It's a fucking hat. A hat.
We still have a couple in summer at our local haven holiday camp.There were wandering minstrels as well. They were popular well into the 20th century, until the BBC realised they were a bit racist.
They'll have to ferret about for an alternative.i think voters will find that policy otterly unacceptable
They'll have to ferret about for an alternative.
stoatallyUsual weasel words will win the day.
I found this hat thing astonishing. First of all, let's imagine the Queen was making a statement. Why are you cheering that? The unelected head of state, there by heredity, sexist heredity, and the combined Supreme Governor of the Church of England and supposed source of the Crown-in-Parliament phenomenon which supposedly imbues legitimacy and sovereignty and symbolises the fused powers of executive and legislature, is your idea of a rebel? She symbolises a state which doesn't get its sovereignty from the people, but from her. And she heads the established religion. Which has Lords Spiritual in the higher chamber as of right. Not by coincidence. Not who just happen to be bishops and are now also lords. But who are there because the CofE gets Lords by right. And we pay this monarch to live in palaces and own the swans and dolphins. And this you choose as your champion? Astonishing.
Secondly, it was a blue and yellow hat, ffs. It takes a real leap to see it as a flag. It's a hat with flowers on. It's a fucking hat. A hat.
I'm just more amused that heredity head of your costitutional monarchy is giving two fingers to the sitting govt via her clothing choices.
She is if you approve of and applaud her supposed "rebellion".She's not my champion
She's the actual head of state. Her functions may be mostly symbolic (though not entirely), but her position is literal.She's the symbolic head of your country therefore the only thing she can do is make symbolic gestures.
She wore blue. She has a long history of wearing blue. And if you look at the colour wheel, you'll see that opposite the blues and purples are the oranges and yellows. That's why designers often choose those colours to complement each other. (Any why painters painting a yellow thing use blue and purple in the shading and so on).Like wearing the EU colours to parliament the day May's govt announce 8 Brexit bills.
Don't forget, badger baiting, dog fighting and something that may have a bit of a comeback in the Tory party in weeks to come 'cock fighting'
I think it's a stretch to think this was a coincidence - too big a stretch. But it could as easily have been an ironic statement about the way brexit is dominating everything at the moment as a statement in support of the EU.