Yes I do tend to avoid that thread for a number of reasons, but as you know it doesnt take long before it moves ever so swiftly and you are left behind anywayMay I suggest you avoid the Ukraine war thread.
Yes I do tend to avoid that thread for a number of reasons, but as you know it doesnt take long before it moves ever so swiftly and you are left behind anywayMay I suggest you avoid the Ukraine war thread.
Maybe you need to reread. You've missed at least one.Yes I have
I have read this thread from the beginning and am still waiting for some one with direct experience to join.
It’s a good job none of us have opinions about Parliament else we’d be asked if we’d ever been voted into it.Yes I have
I have read this thread from the beginning and am still waiting for some one with direct experience to join.
bimbleI’m sorry to say that reading your posts is as interesting as watching a light drizzle falling on a half empty tescos car park and also may I suggest you edit yr tagline, henry.
Before you go any further, I would like you to prove your qualification to comment by giving a full run-down of your experience of opining on things that you do not have direct experience of. Thank you in advance.I just cannot get over the fact that there is best part of 50 pages opining on something that no one has any direct experience of.
Its not that difficult, Has anyone on this thread ever been to drag queen story time or not.Before you go any further, I would like you to prove your qualification to comment by giving a full run-down of your experience of opining on things that you do not have direct experience of. Thank you in advance.
Why do you think anybody cares what you (don't) think?Its not that difficult, Has anyone on this thread ever been to drag queen story time or not.
if someone has been then I am mistaken and will own it and of course listen to what they have to say.
If no one has a direct experience then there are still fifty pages , but I may regard these as less informed
I think Kayla actually says she is intersex and unfortunately has a condition that means she has naturally gigantic breasts.the other theory is, if someone says that they are a trans woman then that is what they are, sudden onset intermittent humungous boob syndrome neither here nor there. I'm pretty sure this was trolling, of the school or of "the left" idk.
Are you saying that there's nothing you could ever see in a Daily Mail report that might make you think 'that's a genuine issue of concern, despite the source'?Nah. You just swallowed DM shit hook, line and sinker.
and has been photographed while dressed as a man and without fake breasts. Which sheds doubt on everything this person has claimed.I think Kayla actually says she is intersex and unfortunately has a condition that means she has naturally gigantic breasts.
It's pretty clear they are lying, though (specifically about the gigantic breasts, because they spend at least part of their time presenting as a man, with somewhat less remarkable boobs).I think Kayla actually says she is intersex and unfortunately has a condition that means she has naturally gigantic breasts.
It'd need to be taken with a massive ladle of salt first.Are you saying that there's nothing you could ever see in a Daily Mail report that might make you think 'that's a genuine issue of concern, despite the source'?
I do not think for a moment that people care what I do or do not think other than just another random postWhy do you think anybody cares what you (don't) think?
What I said was perfectly clear.By faith, do you believing in something that there's no evidence for and, in fact, isn't really there... and then vilifying and making laws against anyone who doesn't also believe in that that thing that isn't there?
From 10 years ago on a different thread...Are you saying that there's nothing you could ever see in a Daily Mail report that might make you think 'that's a genuine issue of concern, despite the source'?
What's your evidence base. Aside from tabloid journalism, I assume. You wouldn't be basing your argument solely on a few Daily Mail-type stories about the terrible things that teens get up to.
I think there's a number of people on this thread, myself included, who've been to counterprotests outside the events, but not sure if anyone's actually been inside, if that helps.Its not that difficult, Has anyone on this thread ever been to drag queen story time or not.
if someone has been then I am mistaken and will own it and of course listen to what they have to say.
If no one has a direct experience then there are still fifty pages , but I may regard these as less informed
I think there's quite a big middle ground between "there is no way I could ever be concerned about anything that was mentioned in a Daily Mail article" and "I think on this particular occasion that people are right to be concerned that these two mums have organised an event for other mums that's actually part of a paedo grooming plot".Are you saying that there's nothing you could ever see in a Daily Mail report that might make you think 'that's a genuine issue of concern, despite the source'?
Blimey, that's one of the most impressive deployments of The Files I've seen in a while.From 10 years ago on a different thread...
so you only skim read the thread before butting in because this post answers that questionIts not that difficult, Has anyone on this thread ever been to drag queen story time or not.
if someone has been then I am mistaken and will own it and of course listen to what they have to say.
If no one has a direct experience then there are still fifty pages , but I may regard these as less informed
Don't give him facts to get in the way of his opinion!so you only skim read the thread before butting in because this post answers that question
If the Mail is the only source and it wasn't backed up by others? I'd absolutely treat it as nonsense. They do just regularly flat out lie about things.Are you saying that there's nothing you could ever see in a Daily Mail report that might make you think 'that's a genuine issue of concern, despite the source'?
There's a lot of antisemitic code and canards out there, too. Especially on social media and often badly moderated. The hatred of "others" is amplified online and one way of doing it is claiming that the majority is under attack/its children are under attack or being controlled.I think you're missing the point here. It's not a matter of whether or not we'd take our kids to these events. It's about encouraging hatred of the "other" or anything different or remotely "transgressive". It could be Gypsies or Jews one day, LGB people (without Trans) the next. Current bugbears of conservative, reactionary twats are asylum seekers and trans people. As bellaozzydog says, it's about finding anyone to blame, scapegoating anyone other than the real fuckers in the boss class and the assorted political scum.
Anyone who's banging on with the tedious "think of the children" shite on here needs to wise up because you've been had. Our real enemies are making a mug of you.
sorryDon't give him facts to get in the way of his opinion!
If the Mail is the only source and it wasn't backed up by others? I'd absolutely treat it as nonsense. They do just regularly flat out lie about things.
Maybe not but giving the DM even the slightest credence only goes to empower the arseholes even more. It needs to be roundly shunned.I’m going to gently hazard that this is not what Santino meant.
Maybe not but giving the DM even the slightest credence only goes to empower the arseholes even more. It needs to be roundly shunned.
And every synagogue service in england far as I know has security people outside, from the community, manning the entrance, just in case, always has far as I can recall. This is seen as just normal though not any kind of alarming situation that people in general should worry about or offer to help with.There's a lot of antisemitic code and canards out there, too. Especially on social media and often badly moderated. The hatred of "others" is amplified online and one way of doing it is claiming that the majority is under attack/its children are under attack or being controlled.
how are they doing on cancer causes/cures|?They were right about the Queen dying.
And about coffee.
how are they doing on cancer causes/cures|?
You only know that by checking with other sources.They were right about the Queen dying.
I’ve been to drag story time, just not one run/performed by the drag queen whose story times sparked all the protests. I follow them on other social media though.Its not that difficult, Has anyone on this thread ever been to drag queen story time or not.
if someone has been then I am mistaken and will own it and of course listen to what they have to say.
If no one has a direct experience then there are still fifty pages , but I may regard these as less informed
Are you saying that there's nothing you could ever see in a Daily Mail report that might make you think 'that's a genuine issue of concern, despite the source'?