Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Denormalisation of alcohol

But you've lumped together a load of people you don't like, with wildly differing agendas, as if they are the chief lobbyists against booze. The most vociferous prohibitionists are clinicians.

Some clinicians. Some of the most vociferous legalisers are clinicians specialising in substance misuse.
 
Some clinicians. Some of the most vociferous legalisers are clinicians specialising in substance misuse.

You work in the field. Would it help your case load - if only marginally - if alcohol was more difficult and less exciting to buy, and was less socially acceptable?
 
I'd be prepared to bet that most people don't want alcohol made more difficult to buy, more expensive or less socially acceptable. Which is why it won't happen. :cool:
 
Banning advertising must be why nobody uses drugs.
Alcohol doesn't need advertising, it will sell anyway... just like drugs. Banning advertising just stops the gullible, and society as a whole, from the false impression that there are no consequences and its all fun and games.
 
Nothing there about education or awareness-raising? Both things that could be funded by taxation on the industry profiting from our consumption.

Very much that.

I am against further state control on what I choose to drink.

And that.

Like most people I'm utterly opposed to minimum pricing -- mostly on the grounds that it wouldn't bloody work -- those determined to drink will drink whether you're buying at 30p a can or 90p in the offy or supermarket.

Would a minumum pricing policy increase prices in Wetherspoons? As far as I (unreliably) recall, when the coalition were (supposedly) looking into minimum price rates, those suggested were below Spoons prices.

The pubs people go to when they're fairly skint ....
 
I'm not sure what you mean by "less exciting to buy".

Sold in plain packaging, so the choice of product is not reinforced by branding and advertising. Purchasing the product no longer allows the consumer to buy into a culture or lifestyle.
 
Education and awareness :

In the zone of our own expertise/experience (ales and beers of genuine quality) we'd be delighted to offer a practical and inexpensive course in :

a. Value for money (crudely known in some cases as 'bang for buck' ;) )
b. Quality and variety of taste
c. Quality and variety of licensed premise environment.

No problem. We aim to please :)
 
Sold in plain packaging, so the choice of product is not reinforced by branding and advertising. Purchasing the product no longer allows the consumer to buy into a culture or lifestyle.
Cant see how this would work: Theres many more differentials between different drinks (eg, different breweries various beers) than just brand and packaging.
 
Also, how the hell would you 'plain package' a beer pump in a pub?

(I don't mean 'how literally would you do it?', just : 'how the hell would that work'?)
 
Cant see how this would work: Theres many more differentials between different drinks (eg, different breweries various beers) than just brand and packaging.

Oh, I don't know. I gather from market research folk that spirits drinkers - even ones with strong stated brand preferences - usually can't tell the difference in blind tastings. It really is a case of drinking the packaging.

The pissheads will argue this point, because they believe that they are connoiseurs, rather than fetishists.
 
No way should there be artificially escalated prices.

I am already fed up with that for fags. Not only are they bad for me but the prices make me bankrupt!

Enough of the government taxing way more than needed!

Yes a reduction in the amount of alcohol in the blood for drivers.

Possibly a reduction in advertising.
 
Oh, I don't know. I gather from market research folk that spirits drinkers - even ones with strong stated brand preferences - usually can't tell the difference in blind tastings. It really is a case of drinking the packaging.

The pissheads will argue this point, because they believe that they are connoiseurs, rather than fetishists.

You've got to be trolling.
 
Also, I assume that with plain alcohol packaging there would still be the alcohol content written on. But without fonts or logos or other decorations that information is bound to stand out more, unintentionally emphasising alcohol content. Is that really what people like Maurice Picarda want?
 
I suppose you could have a plaintext label with the brewery/beverage written on it, but wouldn't that in itself be a form of branding? Just one without fancy writing or logos.

It's not very useful branding if you can't advertise, sponsor or communicate with the consumer.
 
Also, I assume that with plain alcohol packaging there would still be the alcohol content written on. But without fonts or logos or other decorations that information is bound to stand out more, unintentionally emphasising alcohol content. Is that really what people like Maurice Picarda want?

It will look insignificant by comparison to the graphic health warnings.
 
Sold in plain packaging, so the choice of product is not reinforced by branding and advertising. Purchasing the product no longer allows the consumer to buy into a culture or lifestyle.

Most wines are in essence already unbranded because wines are sold by region and grape rather then brand. Doesn't seem to make any difference.
 
Most wines are in essence already unbranded because wines are sold by region and grape rather then brand. Doesn't seem to make any difference.

Yeah, good point. Obviously, appellations are very powerful brands indeed, but I'm not sure how they could be undermined.
 
So you think drinkers themselves have no agency? No tastes or preferences which could be communicated via sales?

I think that their individual agency is probably overstated. But I'm concerned with practical things that can be done with legislation and regulation, and as long as those have some impact, they are worthwhile.
 
Back
Top Bottom