articul8
Dishonest sociopath
well I'm on the editorial board of Red Pepper, and its governing Board too. That's about it - so no "political" officeholder. Why do you ask?
well I'm on the editorial board of Red Pepper, and its governing Board too. That's about it - so no "political" officeholder. Why do you ask?
You were the one who brought it up - i don't really understand what you mean by it to be honest
The point I think you were trying to slyly make is that all working class people bar a 'few' are petty criminals and small time drug dealers themselves and therefore would instinctively recognise the behaviour of the looters and would be supportive of it. I think this is total shite and, in fact, the opposite in every sense in the case.
do the nouveau lumpen have less money than some sections of the working class, does the analogy with coppers and bailiffs hold up given this, does this push them into criminality?
i agree a formal definition of criminality gets us nowhere, but thats where many people, especially young people draw the line - we need to look beyond that and actually set out what is/isnt acceptable criminality, what impacts the working class and what doesnt (does looting from argos, what about small shops) that hasnt been done in the iwca piece or here so far beyond rape and murder
did i give the wrong answer?What bodies are you on now A8?
No you didn't. You made it worse, you're an unelected voice of liberal intern london bubble now.did i give the wrong answer?
no that is a million miles away from the point ive been making
I don't think it was purely meaningless - the fact that no-one loots Primark is not accidental. Which isn't to say that it can the riots this time can be simply celebrated as incipient progressive rebellion - I don't think that.
There is a clear link between the temporary suspension of law/policing and the opportunity to cross the space between the commodity-sphere and the reality of material impoverishment. The problem is that this space is traversed by atomised individuals - asocially - without any real sense of collective empowerment.
ask local residents in Manchester or Salford where the Tories don't get a look in, they will use the same language.rioter = criminal?
How is this any different from David Cameron's position?
rioter = criminal?
How is this any different from David Cameron's position?
You're a broken record on this. Yes, I did read what he posted. And it seemed pretty clear to me. The riots were caused by 'sheer criminality'. No nuance. No ambiguity.did you read what he posted?
Who cares what David Cameron thinks? Does everybody have to take the opposite poll of opinion to the Tories to play safe? That to me is ultra leftism. An infantile knee jerk reaction with a heavy dose of denial added to the equation.
Most working class people, who I know, both black and white, left wing and apolitical, are disgusted with the rioters and consider them to be criminals and that is a conclusion they have reached by being near the events and not thru media manipulation. They rightly see them as selfish, to put it mildly. The people who participated cannot be equated with say, the poll Tax rioters, who had a cause and on being arrested were, in effect, political prisoners with the sympathy of millions.
For most people the riots played out with an uncanny resemblance to the film 28 days later, as the mobs got nearer and nearer to peoples homes in a whirlwind of nightmarish Darwinism, preying on the weak, until they were virtually coming thru your window.
Somebody mentioned Single parent mums stealing trainers.
Watch this video. IGNORE the title and go straight to minute 4.59. Turn off the sound. Turn off the Annotations.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFMfG-Fyrxk
I think Cameron is wrong. I think the people going through the courts right now show that he is wrong. And you will find a diversity of opinions in the areas where the riots happened. So what?
You're a broken record on this. Yes, I did read what he posted. And it seemed pretty clear to me. The riots were caused by 'sheer criminality'. No nuance. No ambiguity.
Look I'm getting the feeling that this is pointless but;
1. .......
2. Ask yourself this were the local communities in London and Birmingham who came out on the streets to protect their homes and areas wrong to do so? Why do you think they did it?
3. .......
not sure i agree with the race analysis tho - there are numerous white estates that have been abandoned to gangs and criminality for a really long time
i'm not sure moralising about whose riots are better and more "right" is of much particular use
In the same way that were people with a lust for violence in the poll tax riots there were in these riots as well andf in the same way that there were people who were sticking it up the arses of capitalists there would have been in this one as well.
Do people ever riot for just one reason?
there was a considerable amount of looting involved in the poll tax riot. i walked up tottenham court road and saw a load of looted electronics shops. i saw at least two looted off licences. i saw looted music shops. i saw a jewellers getting looted. and even if you didn't actually see it, there were the reports of looting. so if your argument is there was fuck all looting in the poll tax riot, you either chose to ignore it, didn't see it or have preferred to rewrite history.Just ask yourself one question and you have your answer: How much looting was involved in the Poll Tax 'riot'? I personally saw one window kicked in in Shaftsbury Avenue and some one ran off with a single boot! And that was it. Compare that with Croydon. In other words, how political a riot is, and the motivations of those involved comes down what risks are taken for personal gain. Setting fire to the SA embassy for example. Huge risk zero return.
the young scamps in that video were clearly just taking the opportunity, during the suspension of the law (that protects existing class relations and its phantasmagoria of commodity images), to traverse the space between the commodity-sphere and the reality of material impoverishment - these acts (which unveil the psychology of commodification and the suspension of reification in rioting)[
but this wasn't what i said - i wasn't saying the riots should be celebrated just understood in their complexity. This means avoiding gushing excitement AND the Cassandra-like tendency to read in every event the proof of our own powerlessness.should be celebrated for what they clearly are - a new beginning in class politics
There was loads of looting in the poll tax riot.Just ask yourself one question and you have your answer: How much looting was involved in the Poll Tax 'riot'? I personally saw one window kicked in in Shaftsbury Avenue and some one ran off with a single boot! And that was it. Compare that with Croydon. In other words, how political a riot is, and the motivations of those involved comes down what risks are taken for personal gain. Setting fire to the SA embassy for example. Huge risk zero return.
how would you overcome this problem ... leads to asocial behaviour of looting of charity shops , small corner shop businesses ,stealing MacMillan charity collections, smashing up third sector social enterprisee , the housing office, local pubs , car jacking, pulling a motor cyclist off his bike then driving it off, mugging students etc?
i wasn't saying the riots should be celebrated just understood in their complexity. This means avoiding gushing excitement AND the Cassandra-like tendency to read in every event the proof of our own powerlessness.