LeytonCatLady
Well-Known Member
This is why we still have a royal family innit?
'Back to work, plebs. If the Queen can do it you can too.'
View attachment 311214
MSN
www.msn.com
This is why we still have a royal family innit?
'Back to work, plebs. If the Queen can do it you can too.'
View attachment 311214
I find it challenging even to watch others deconstructing his cynical bullshit.I am hoping never to feel the need to watch another of his videos.
You can influence which videos it tries to recommend to you, at least if you are logged in. Hovering over the three dots next to video titles gives options including 'not interested' and 'dont recommend channel'.I find it challenging even to watch others deconstructing his cynical bullshit.
I hope he's not making a fortune out of it.
Bloody Youtube keeps showing me right wing shite and earlier there was some nutjob NZ virus-denying doctor.
Yes - I keep doing that but it keeps showing me the stuff.You can influence which videos it tries to recommend to you, at least if you are logged in. Hovering over the three dots next to video titles gives options including 'not interested' and 'dont recommend channel'.
if you are on chrome use the guest profile for any such searches, or the version for whatever browser you useYes - I keep doing that but it keeps showing me the stuff.
I have a premium account ...
It was probably my fault for googling the antivax nutjob who was in here last night ...
The not at all mandatory one, you mean?they can still bang on about the vaccine, unfortunately.
The premise of "boosters" was to maintain antibody-readiness and thereby minimising disease even when other physical measures are dropped...How long does it take for the booster to wear off?
I bet they're hoping that millions will opt for infection rather than vaccination ...I think I remember reading somewhere that an autumn jab for a wider group, together with one for flu is also planned ?
I'm going to disappoint "them" as I'll want the jab and not an infection.I bet they're hoping that millions will opt for infection rather than vaccination ...
I don't actually think they're much bothered either way. They've got so used to the idea of making things go away by ignoring them - NHS problems, benefits claimants, coronavirus, Parliamentary convention - that pretty much nothing impinges unless they're hit in the face with it. Or the bank balance.I bet they're hoping that millions will opt for infection rather than vaccination ...
I don't actually think they're much bothered either way. They've got so used to the idea of making things go away by ignoring them - NHS problems, benefits claimants, coronavirus, Parliamentary convention - that pretty much nothing impinges unless they're hit in the face with it. Or the bank balance.
My own guideline is to keep an eye on the 7-day rolling prevalence dipping to ≲20/100k (though a senior colleague is looking for ~1). So we are only off by a factor of several hundred (or a few thousand) right now (ONS/REACT; the daily testing number is largely meaningless other than perhaps, at times, as trend guidance).Is there an acceptable amount of transmission I need to be looking out for or something?
This begs questions like: 'What' is wearing off? How immunocompetent is the person concerned?How long does it take for the booster to wear off?
I'm assuming I'm immunoincompetentThis begs questions like: 'What' is wearing off? How immunocompetent is the person concerned?
that's the planBut then you will get infected (unless you completely isolate yourself from everyone and everything),
It depends how much you want to go to raves or go abroad.when it would be sensible to stop mask-wearing and social distancing and start going to raves and going on foreign holiday? Is there an acceptable amount of transmission I need to be looking out for or something?
How do you or your colleague arrive at these numbers?My own guideline is to keep an eye on the 7-day rolling prevalence dipping to ≲20/100k (though a senior colleague is looking for ~1). So we are only off by a factor of several hundred (or a few thousand) right now (ONS/REACT; the daily testing number is largely meaningless other than perhaps, at times, as trend guidance).
20/100k was the trigger point for red listing travel the last two years.How do you or your colleague arrive at these numbers?
Really want to go to a rave. Not fussed about holidaysIt depends how much you want to go to raves or go abroad.
But are they arrived at from the point of view of personal risk, or public health responsibility?20/100k was the trigger point for red listing travel the last two years.
My learned colleague is considering use of public transport and the prolonged occupation of shared, moderate-poorly ventilated confined spaces therein (me less so since I cycle or walk everywhere). They are a leading infectious diseases expert.
Both.But are they arrived at from the point of view of personal risk, or public health responsibility?
You see people on here talking about the herd immunity plan as some sort of devious plot when what it really amounted to was an attempt to just shrug it off. He couldn't then but he reckons he's at the point now where he can safely leave it be so that's what he's doing.
Not that you should be under any obligation to justify the level that you personally feel comfortable with, but waiting for prevalence to fall to 1/100th or 1/1000th or less of what it currently is, seems an extraordinarily cautious approach - is there any expectation we will reach those levels in the foreseeable future, or ever will? The red list threshold (however that was determined at the time) was determined on the basis of an unvaccinated population wasn't it?Both.