CNN poll - 82% agree with Charlie Sheen that 9/11 is a government cover-up

[Fong]

I am still unsure how when a plane is flown into the side of a massively tall building, at about 1/3rd the way from the top, people are not at all surprised when that building falls down into itself.

Have none of you ever played Jenga?

Tall shit don't fall straight down, unless you make it fall straight down.

Tall stuff has a habit of topppling over, esp when you hit it somewhere near the top, what usually happens if you cripple the above middle of a tall item? The top falls off, it doesn't collapse inward, it falls off the side as it topples over.

What you are saying that a plane flew into a building, and that building burnt in such a manner that the inside collpased perfectly and allowed the top to fall inwards. That at no time did any side of the building collapse earlier or weaken earlier then the middle, for the moment one side weakens, the top would fall off.

That is so incredibly unlikely, this is the sort of thing that takes a demolitions crew to do properly.

One building, maybe a fluke of dynamics could make it happen, but two seperate buildings side by side, both hit by planes at different levels and yet both of them managed to burn so perfectly that they collapsed inwards.

That isn't conspiracy theory, thats bloody common sense isn't it?

 

[Fong]

No-one could have predicted terrorists using passenger jets as flying bombs prior to 9/11, any fule no that.

They used a time machine to make that programme!

You know in a show called 7 Days, rather mediocre sci fi from 1998.

They flew missiles into the Pentagon, they flew a plane into the Statue of Liberty.

Both times done by 'terrorists'

The idea of flying a plane into something as an act of terrorism, isn't really unheard of. I think its been a staple diet of crappy sci-fi programmes for years.

 

[Azrael23]

I completely agree Fong. The only point where I`d have to correct you is where you forgot that 3 buildings fell perfectly onto their own footprint that day. The Two Towers AND WTC 7, the former falling prey to a fire on 3 floors. Yep thats bound to cause a building to fall perfectly on its own footprint.
Larry Goldstein the insurance holder of WTC7, said live on TV "we had witnessed such loss of life that we thought the smartest thing to do was just pull it. So we took the decision to pull"

What is Pull?

Pull is a term used by controlled demolition teams to signify pulling a building down. The exact term relates to the way the detonation of the support columns at the top of a building "pulls" a crease across the top of the structure which then collapses in on itself.

So you see, they`ve already admitted WTC7 was brought down by controlled demo. Its no leap of faith when you look at the way the towers fell that they too were demolished after the planes hit.
Why?

The symbolism of the destruction of the two towers. Hitting them with planes was not good enough, total destruction was needed to have maximum psychological impact.

 

[editor]

On a side note - over 100 good natured posts... have you ever noticed someone by their absence?

I'm back!

If you wish to trot out the same 9/11 bollocks all over again - albeit with all-new single celebrity endorsement - do it on your own board.

Several people - including myself - have offered to help you set up your own boards where you will be free to endlessly recycle the same fact-free fantasies without fear of the pesky editor interfering or having to encounter alien concepts like requests for credible, peer-reviewed evidence and analysis.

A little late, but....