Grego Morales
New Member
Is this one of those repetition threads that have been doing the rounds?
CNN poll - 82% agree with Charlie Sheen that 9/11 is a government cover-up
- Thread starter Jazzz
- Start date
- Status
You have watched the CNN programme I linked to in the original post?Mrs Magpie said:
If you haven't, here it is again, maybe you'll have an idea then. They claim an overwhelming public response from emails in addition to the poll.
As for entertainer says something... well this is poor Mrs M. On the other thread I gave the example of Bob Marley as being an entertainer who made a big difference by not refraining from political statements. You could add John Lennon as an anti-war. Woodstock was instrumental in stopping vietnam. I would say it is an entertainer's duty to make a stand when their conscience dictates it.
Dirty Martini
gets what he cant want
Jazzz said:
Somewhere in the middle of B more like.
Monkeygrinder's Organ
Dodgy geezer swilling vapid lager
trashpony said:
Bernie Gunther
Fundamentalist Druid
Do you have a link to the actual poll? I can't seem to find it.Jazzz said:
Ah ... ignore that. I found it. Left sidebar.
81% right now. Still interesting though.
Monkeygrinder's Organ
Dodgy geezer swilling vapid lager
trashpony said:Bit of a shock, isn't it?
I expect you need a bit of a sit-down now.
There's no time. I need to find out who's responsible for the cover up of the poll, herd some cats and put clean sheets on my bed before I go to sleep.
Bernie Gunther
Fundamentalist Druid
Poll is right there on the left nav bar in the link from Jazz's post (the one quoted in my post 96 above)
Bernie Gunther
Fundamentalist Druid
Let's be clear though.
a) this is an internet poll, so it's not representative, especially if various sites are freeping it (ie encouraging their particular audiences to vote on it)
b) it doesn't say anything about what happened on 911, but it does say something about the psychological state of an apparently large number of Americans.
I'd be very interested to see a properly conducted poll on this. A figure of 80-odd percent in an internet poll is sufficiently skewed, especially given the large sample size, to make it likely that large numbers of Americans are dubious about their government's version of the events of 911. That doesn't mean any of the stuff about robot planes and lasers is true, but it does indicate a fairly deep level of distrust of their government by the US people.
Which is in itself quite interesting.
a) this is an internet poll, so it's not representative, especially if various sites are freeping it (ie encouraging their particular audiences to vote on it)
b) it doesn't say anything about what happened on 911, but it does say something about the psychological state of an apparently large number of Americans.
I'd be very interested to see a properly conducted poll on this. A figure of 80-odd percent in an internet poll is sufficiently skewed, especially given the large sample size, to make it likely that large numbers of Americans are dubious about their government's version of the events of 911. That doesn't mean any of the stuff about robot planes and lasers is true, but it does indicate a fairly deep level of distrust of their government by the US people.
Which is in itself quite interesting.
Bernie Gunther
Fundamentalist Druid
It's showing 20,000-odd doubters.Epico said:
Does 911truth.org really have that many readers? If so, that's pretty scary.
Grego Morales
New Member
Does anyone know anything about Kingfishers? Are they more amazing than 9/11 cover-ups?
Did you check the vote count? I voted twice - to see what would happen - and the second vote didn't register.laptop said:I seem to remember that they're very smelly up close.
But that might have been evil propaganda spread by small fish.
And I've just voted twice on the CNN poll
Backatcha Bandit
is not taking your calls
I had a thought (yeah, I know) on the thread that got flushed from WPCA earlier - reproduced here for you derision and amusement:
It's the only way I can make any sort of sense of it.Me said:
Backatcha Bandit said:It's the only way I can make any sort of sense of it.
Your choice of image, not mine. If we were allowed to edit other posters' .sig files...
Anyway. Is that a meta-conspiracy "theory" or a proposed meta-meta-conspiracy?
I always get confused somewhere about two-and-a-half-bluff. Is this a failing?
Blimey you're a pessimist! Have some faith!Backatcha Bandit said:I had a thought (yeah, I know) on the thread that got flushed from WPCA earlier - reproduced here for you derision and amusement:
It's the only way I can make any sort of sense of it.
Did you listen to Charlie's interviews? He mentions a wide range of anomalies, not least WTC7, and seems well versed. He has now challenged Larry Silverstein to explain what he meant in the infamous 'pull it' quote.
I didn't think he fell in with that 'no plane hit the pentagon', just that one had to doubt the assertion that flight 77 hit it unless proved, which is very different. I would be surprised if images of flight 77 hitting the Pentagon appeared. (of which there should be many, such as the Gas station footage, the Sheraton Hotel footage, not to mention Pentagon's own)
Grego Morales
New Member
I'm so bored with the U...S...A...
Backatcha Bandit
is not taking your calls
Hey, I'm just saying what I'd do if it was my job to 'manage perceptions' - assuming, God forbid! - that 'perceptions' needed to be 'managed'.laptop said:
Backatcha Bandit
is not taking your calls
'world politics/current affairs'Jazzz said:BB, what does 'WPCA' stand for?
God, I'm lazy.
Come on, then. What would YOU do if it was your job to 'cover up' something like a diabolical MIHOP scenario? Use you imagination!
Oh, I thought the CA was some witty addition, and I was obliging with the feedline.
I'll have a think about your question...
.. but edited to add, I wouldn't be doing this. This is simply not good for cover-up purposes at all. This is an absolute nightmare for Bush & Co. It's a validation of questions that were previously dismissed by the mainstream media. Maybe they will 'come up' with something - they will have to respond to it. But faking evidence has its own problems, problems far bigger than simply removing evidence and forgetting all about it.
You want your Hollywood celebrities talking about inconsequential matters like tooth whitening. Not how the president might just be a murdering trickster that's responsible for worst terrorist atrocity on US soil. Definitely not!
I'll have a think about your question...
.. but edited to add, I wouldn't be doing this. This is simply not good for cover-up purposes at all. This is an absolute nightmare for Bush & Co. It's a validation of questions that were previously dismissed by the mainstream media. Maybe they will 'come up' with something - they will have to respond to it. But faking evidence has its own problems, problems far bigger than simply removing evidence and forgetting all about it.
You want your Hollywood celebrities talking about inconsequential matters like tooth whitening. Not how the president might just be a murdering trickster that's responsible for worst terrorist atrocity on US soil. Definitely not!
Backatcha Bandit
is not taking your calls
Kid_Eternity
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Oh please god don't encourage more theoritcal lunacy from them...
No-one could have predicted terrorists using passenger jets as flying bombs prior to 9/11, any fule no that.Backatcha Bandit said:
They used a time machine to make that programme!
Jazzz said:They used a time machine to make that programme!
One wonders what sort of machine was used to make you. Fela Fan is obviously the product of some sort of invention, but you are not always silly; you can apparently enthrall people with your music. It takes a special machine to achieve such combinations.
- Status
Similar threads
