brogdale
Coming to terms with late onset Anarchism
Not sure what point you're making tbhOh dear, how sad, what a shame, never mind.
Not sure what point you're making tbhOh dear, how sad, what a shame, never mind.
Well she’s had the baby according to Sky News.
...Ex] but I have tried to challenge the whoring of her.
Nigel Farage (yes I know) on LBC radio is saying she has given birth.
Now The shit really has hit the fan.
Nonsense.... its obligations to her are the same as any other UK national.
Go on...Nonsense.
If you think others have been whoring her then you have been badly misunderstanding. Fwiw your posts come across like you are minimising her responsibility because she's *only* a girl who *only* got married and had children.Exactly, I've not consciously sought to portray her as the Madonna, but I have tried to challenge the whoring of her.
Impossible to say until she's tried.I haven't read the whole thread but has this woman committed any kind of criminal offence?
Impossible to say until she's tried.
I haven't read the whole thread but has this woman committed any kind of criminal offence?
If I see you shoot Tim in the head, then you tell everyone “I just shot Tim in the head”, would you be not guilty until you were tried?Impossible to say until she's tried.
Impossible to say until she's tried.
Yes, technically, absent any conviction she's innocent. Like, say, Jimmy Savile and Jack The Ripper.
As we've established, it's up to the UK state to decide whether or not they want to extradite, arrest, try and (possibly) convict Begum. Similarly if she makes her way back under her own steam.If I see you shoot Tim in the head, then you tell everyone “I just shot Tim in the head”, would you be not guilty until you were tried?
That was the question posed:Yes, technically, absent any conviction she's innocent. Like, say, Jimmy Savile and Jack The Ripper.
has this woman committed any kind of criminal offence?
To which the answer is 'yes', by her own admission.That was the question posed:
That was the question posed:
Her reported/broadcast comments from the context of the Syrian DP camp might suggest that, but that's not how the state judicial system works, is it?To which the answer is 'yes', by her own admission.
None of us have any proof, do we?I know. I'm agreeing with you that, by virtue of the presumption of innocence, she hasn't committed a crime. But pointing out that that legal fiction can lead to absurdity.
Her much more serious offences were commited in Syria. Slavery for a start...
None of us have any proof, do we?
Well if you agree that, great. So far the state seems to be saying that we're not going to lift a finger to help her and if she arrives in the UK under her own steam she'll be arrested and possibly prosecuted. All of which is perfectly fine by me.... it's up to the UK state to decide whether or not they want to extradite, arrest, try and (possibly) convict Begum.
..The alleged offence(s) will remain unproven until or unless she faces trial in a UK court.
She's in Syria, the most serious crimes she's accused of - and admits to - occured in Syria and were committed against
Would going and marrying an IS member be regarded as supporting a terrorist organisation or whatever the offence is called here in England and Wales.