But thats just a semantic way for you to claim that she poses a significant risk, and if you can do that then I can claim that Spymaster poses a significant risk as well. I might feel like saying it but it doesn't really stand up to scrutiny its just armchair psychology and conjecture. Of...
www.urban75.net
It's funny you mention intelligence, because in the case of the three girls who went to turkey, the effect was, turkey
arrested the man that brought them across the border, they long claimed he was a Canadian intelligence agent
Foreign Minister Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu said that an intelligence agent from a country that is a member of the anti-ISIS coalition had helped the three...
www.dailysabah.com
They shut the turkey route into Syria that NATO was using to get the mujahedeen across
It's an odd experience flying in to Hatay, southern Turkey, on the border with Syria and its nasty and seemingly infinite war these days: there is a truly international flavor to the passenger manifests.
edition.cnn.com
It was an international scandal so why wasn't she asked in the BBC interview who brought them across and how they contacted that person?
That Al-Qaeda were using American ordered eastern european arms was confirmed in this report
At least 350 diplomatic Silk Way Airlines (an Azerbaijani state-run company) flights transported weapons for war conflicts across the world over the last 3 years. The state aircrafts of Azerbaijan carried on-board tens of tons of heavy weapons and ammunition headed to terrorists under the cover...
dilyana.bg
That ISIS was using US ordered Eastern European weapons was confirmed in conflict armament research's three year study of disposed battlefield arms in the weapons of the Islamic state study
This report is the result of more than three years of field investigation into Islamic State supply chains. It presents an analysis of more than 40,000 items recovered from the group between 2014 and 2017. These items encompass weapons, ammunition, and the traceable components and chemical...
www.conflictarm.com
Proven without doubt, from battlefield to supplier, to purchase order (ordered under us army licence diverted to a warzone)
Regardless of whether you intended to supply Al-Qaeda and ISIS you should be held accountable for dumping weapons into a war zone
And if you are supplying weapons to your militia pals why not just use US made weapons why use covertly ordered Eastern European weapons? Is it because if it ends up in the hands of 'the bad jihadis' as opposed to the good jihadis you have culpable deniability. Let's assume that the weapons reached their intended recipients because hey you have a history, remember the stingers remember Afghanistan. In a parallel of history they were also fighting a Russian satellite, just like Assad.
The history of the west's involvement with amateur jihadi warriors fighting the west's proxy wars starts with Afghanistan, the blessed mujahedeen, maybe Thatcher's last gift to humanity, an international of psychopathic mass murderers willing to fight the west's wars they've turned up in Tajikistan, Bosnia, Chechnya twice, Syria, Libya Iraq, Yemen, (all either russia or syria aligned states) after the Afghan civil war, according to Paul Stott's exacting doctorate study the UK became a safe haven for the mujahedeen fighters
British Jihadism - the detail and the denial
ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk
"In 1997 the United Kingdom banned the promotion of terrorism overseas. It was an
action that may be considered overdue – members of jihadist groups from at least 14
territories are shown to have settled in this country, with four major terrorist
organisations operating here – the Algerian GIA, Egyptian Islamic Jihad, Libyan
Islamic Fighting Group and Al-Qaeda."
Thatcher and Major allowed four extremely highly militant terrorist groups to openly take root in the UK along with almost every non violent politically Islamist group after the Afghan civil war. Those groups simply continued operating basing themselves in the UK coordinating the Paris attacks in 1994 the east African is embassy bombings in 1998, and the Algerian civil war. Remember Theresa May's grandstanding how she was standing up to terrorists by sending them home, the Tories let them in they created the problem. When the Tories came to power in 2010 they again used British Muslims to fight wars in Libya, Syria, Iraq, Yemen just as Thatcher did. The Tories see British Muslims as nothing more than disposable humans to die on a battlefield. They allowed the most manipulative people in history to openly operate and recruit from the British muslim community, frankly the British muslim community stood no chance while appeasers such as Michael Clarke and the king's college war studies department tolerated mass murdering violent jihadis on British streets recruiting gullible simpletons halfwits to kill themselves on foreign battlefields persuaded by charismatic preachers openly operating among us telling the dickhead brigade they will be pioneers in a beautiful new state while silently measuring them up for bomb vests
Michael Clarke: Britain's culture of tolerating radicalism is in the national interest and should not be swept away by the urge to get tough.
www.theguardian.com
You see keeping this girl locked up in a camp won't do anything while the west continues a pattern of using dickheads who think they will achieve paradise by killing themselves in a kamikaze strategy to fight their proxy wars. The conservatives, NATO and the intelligence agencies introduced salafi jihadism to Britain. Lock them in a camp.
