Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

British IS schoolgirl 'wants to return home'

Disruptive Conduct
Could have said stupid assertion, but I thought I'd be nice and say bold assertion. For someone who thinks people should prove their worth in communities in which they move you've a very peculiar attitude in which other people have to show their value but you don't. Xmas dinner? Many friendships have started here and indeed relationships and families. Don't make out this is some lesser version of reality, or you'll really show how worthless (or worthy) you are.

You keep making out I'm a big cheese and I'm trying to intimidate you. I am not a big cheese. There are better respected posters here than me. There are angrier posters here than me. And frankly there are posters who know more about cheese here than me. I'm not seen as an elder, an influencer, an untouchable. That's you projecting your views onto me rather than looking at any actual evidence.

I don't think you'll last long here, because you seem determined to make yourself obnoxious. Not up to me of course whether you sink or swim here. But you're the one tying lead weights to your feet
As usual you lead with insults: peculiar...worthless...obnoxious.
Good job I’m comfortable with myself, mate. Because those words are pretty nasty.
 
In a ruling on Thursday, Mr Justice Chamberlain said that the removing of their citizenship had made them stateless.

He said: "C3, C4 and C7 have persuaded us that, on the dates when the decisions and the orders in their cases were made, they were not nationals of Bangladesh or any other state apart from the UK.

"This means that orders depriving them of their British citizenship would make them stateless."
The judge added: "The secretary of state had no power to make orders with that effect.
"For that reason - and that reason alone - the appeals against the decisions to make those orders succeed."


 
Have they cleared this decision with Athos ?

Ironically, this decision bolsters the case against Begum. Their lawyers explicitly argued that they ceased to be Bangladeshi citizens when they reached 21, such that the decision to strip then of British citizenship after that date left them stateless (whereas Begum hadn't reached 21, and so was still a Bangladeshi citizen).
 
Last edited:
Ironically, this decision bolsters the case against Begum. Their lawyers explicitly argued that they ceased to be Bangladeshi citizens when they reached 21, such that the decision to strip then of British citizenship after that date left them stateless (whereas Begum hadn't reached 21, and so was still a Bangladeshi citizen).
Not the killer post someone thought it would be then.
 
To those of you cheering along the Begum decision, are you not even a tiny bit ashamed of yourselves for supporting the idea that her case should be treated differently due to her extreme youth?
 
To those of you cheering along the Begum decision, are you not even a tiny bit ashamed of yourselves for supporting the idea that her case should be treated differently due to her extreme youth?

For the record, in case it needs saying again, I'm not "cheering along" the decision. My position remains: First, that I have a number of criticisms of this law; secondly, that this isn't my preferred outcome in this particular case; but, third, that the claims that the HS acted unlawfully/that Begum's not a Bangladeshi citizen (for the purposes of English law) advanced by some here aren't legally sound (albeit it's not impossible that her lawyers are able to advance some good arguments later, such that her substantive appeal will succeed).
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom