Athos
Well-Known Member
Where do people get this shit from?
This question has been settled very clearly and comprehensively by several courts now. Legally (according to Bristish and Bangladeshi law), Begum was a dual national at the time she was stripped of her British citizenship so the act did not make her stateless. According to Bangaldeshi law she is a citizen of that nation by birth until she is 21 unless she renounces it. She hasn't. The fact that a couple of Bangledeshi politicians have said she is not a citizen of theirs doesn't change what their law says. If the Chief of the Met Police said "driving at 100mph is legal", that wouldn't make it legal. He'd just be misinterpreting the law or, as in the case of Begum, simply ignoring what it says for his own ends.
Quite.
See s.5 of the Citizenship Act 1951 (as amended). It does not include and requirement of application or registration that you seem to be claiming:
5. Subject to the provisions of section 3 a person born after the commencement of this Act, shall be a citizen of Bangladesh by descent if his 4[ father or mother] is a citizen of Bangladesh at the time of his birth:
Provided that if the 5[ father or mother] of such person is a citizen of Bangladesh by descent only, that person shall not be a citizen of Bangladesh by virtue of this section unless-
(a) that person's birth having occurred in a country outside Bangladesh the birth is registered at a Bangladesh Consulate or Mission in that country, or where there is no Bangladesh Consulate or Mission in that country at the prescribed Consulate or Mission or at a Bangladesh Consulate or Mission in the country nearest to that country; or
(b) that person's 6[ father or mother] is, at the time of the birth, in the service of any Government in Bangladesh.