Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Beating the Fascists: The authorised history of Anti-Fascist Action

I don't think this is any way as clear cut as 'having faith' in Gable.

Gable/Searchlight always had their own agenda. Sometimes it co-incided with that of AFA and others. Other times it did not.

We always knew this. So did they. So it was always a macabre dance... a bit like black widows mating... but with each side determined to be the female IYSWIM.

But his decline into paranoid rambling is perhaps a direct result of years of trying to play every side of the fence, of subterfuge and double-dealing. It's a shitty old business.
 
what did Mal say?

never had anything to do with searchlight, never met any apart from matt collins. i did email them about 62 group and sonia sent me some stuff on them which was from the 'good old days.' also got a load of issues from the 70s from bignose and they are good. who else had the info at the time? is the narrative something like 'as RA needed a broader front with AFA, AFA needed a strong source of information and searchlight were the only game in town. they had the info.' is that about right?
 
Last edited:
But his decline into paranoid rambling is perhaps a direct result of years of trying to play every side of the fence, of subterfuge and double-dealing. It's a shitty old business.

spot on. paranoia is a BIG part of this and with death threats, people 'popping round' with flammable presents, being attacked etc. hardly surprising. hows the book by the way?
 
something mumbled and cryptic about "oor Wullie" getting a christmas job at the sorting office or somthing
feelin_bitchy_cover.jpg
 
never had anything to do with searchlight, never met any apart from matt collins. i did email them about 62 group and sonia sent me some stuff on them which was from the 'good old days.' also got a load of issues from the 70s from bignose and they are good. who else had the info at the time? is the narrative something like 'as RA needed a broader front with AFA, AFA needed a strong source of information and searchlight were the only game in town. they had the info.' is that about right?

There were other intell sources around , whilst most of them went to Searchlight there were others who were independent. Prob true to say that there was a time when the Searchies had the widest intell but not the only intell.
You won't remember Forewarned a curious publication from a group of ex CPers based around a fella called Dave Roberts. There main theory was that fascism was based on the landed gentry and aristocracy . They published names and adresses of loads of NF and BM but even then there was a suspicion that they had links with state services.

Any news of the publication date for your book? Its a bit too late for Xmas presents.
 
not out till next year mate but you will be getting one gratis! forewarned was before my time but support for fascism tried to move 'down' and appeal to working class youth - BM, NF footsoldiers etc. trusting anyone or any information is always going to difficult but it as to be said, facebook of all places is a very good source. you'd be surprised what they give away to alts etc when pissed at night.
 
not out till next year mate but you will be getting one gratis! forewarned was before my time but support for fascism tried to move 'down' and appeal to working class youth - BM, NF footsoldiers etc. trusting anyone or any information is always going to difficult but it as to be said, facebook of all places is a very good source. you'd be surprised what they give away to alts etc when pissed at night.


Facebook is where the Police mainly get their far right intell from.
 
politely, malatesta, not your best work.

your blog was a great thing when it had a real target to oppose. I am not sure what tweaking the tail of someone who is, in your own description, "an overweight has-been hooligan and a grass" really achieves.
 
politely, malatesta, not your best work.

your blog was a great thing when it had a real target to oppose. I am not sure what tweaking the tail of someone who is, in your own description, "an overweight has-been hooligan and a grass" really achieves.
something useful could have come from it. for a moment, when the one actual answer began, i thought he may actually say something. But, naah, one quick, fairly obvious comment and 'fuck off spakka.' You need to stroke a twat like thats ego, tell him he is the big man, unique insights blah blah. Not tell him off for his spelling
 
You need to stroke a twat like thats ego, tell him he is the big man, unique insights blah blah.

Personally I don't see the point of bothering. He's a lonely, bitter, isolated no mark who should just be left to disappear down the drain of history. It's not as if he has any far-right influence left and not much will be learned from a man who has wasted over half his life in jail and seems little interested in reflecting on the reasons why.
 
that was the conversation for bad or for worse
'The correspondence fizzled out after that. So make of it what you will!'
what did you expect?
 
Personally I don't see the point of bothering. He's a lonely, bitter, isolated no mark who should just be left to disappear down the drain of history. It's not as if he has any far-right influence left and not much will be learned from a man who has wasted over half his life in jail and seems little interested in reflecting on the reasons why.
but he was a notable figure. A good interview would get something out of him, but still show him up for the useless waste of space he always was. Using his own words to show he's shite, rather than your own works much better.
 
that was the conversation for bad or for worse
'The correspondence fizzled out after that. So make of it what you will!'
what did you expect?
You should have chucked it online until you got a better one. It says as close to nothing as you can get without actually saying nothing, and you dont come out of it that well either. Pretend it never happened.
 
that was the conversation for bad or for worse

I find it bizarre that barely a few days ago you were bemoaning the fact of the existence of a well researched article, written by a socialist, on a dead ex-fascist which featured considered and interesting contributions from fascists, anti-fascists and others along with a host of archival material which was all blended into a decent (if not exactly groundbreaking or new) piece of social and sub-cultural history - you're response to this was 'why' was it done

yet barely a few days later you come out with this
 
I don't think this is any way as clear cut as 'having faith' in Gable.

Gable/Searchlight always had their own agenda. Sometimes it co-incided with that of AFA and others. Other times it did not.

We always knew this. So did they. So it was always a macabre dance... a bit like black widows mating... but with each side determined to be the female IYSWIM.

But his decline into paranoid rambling is perhaps a direct result of years of trying to play every side of the fence, of subterfuge and double-dealing. It's a shitty old business.
Fair do's, I am still a bit of a bitter fucker over this and was having a dig. Not deserved really.
 
You should have chucked it online until you got a better one. It says as close to nothing as you can get without actually saying nothing, and you dont come out of it that well either. Pretend it never happened.

he is stil clearly deluded and in denial. that was the conversation.
 
Back
Top Bottom