Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

And next, Syria?

Have you got a link for that or any more information? All I can find is a sentence about truce ending under which it had allowed a few rebels to stick around and an army statement talking about the terrorists and how the people there wanted them back.

Saw an article elsewhere but talked about by Patrick Cockburn here as well...

http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/07/01/the-media-and-syria/

On Tuesday I travelled to Tal Kalakh, a town of 55,000 people just north of the border with Lebanon, which was once an opposition bastion. Three days previously, government troops had taken over the town and 39 Free Syrian Army (FSA) leaders had laid down their weapons. Talking to Syrian army commanders, an FSA defector and local people, it was evident there was no straight switch from war to peace. It was rather that there had been a series of truces and ceasefires arranged by leading citizens of Tal Kalakh over the previous year.

But at the very time I was in the town, Al Jazeera Arabic was reporting fighting there between the Syrian army and the opposition. Smoke was supposedly rising from Tal Kalakh as the rebels fought to defend their stronghold. Fortunately, this appears to have been fantasy and, during the several hours I was in the town, there was no shooting, no sign that fighting had taken place and no smoke.

Of course, all sides in a war pretend that no position is lost without a heroic defence against overwhelming numbers of the enemy. But obscured in the media’s accounts of what happened in Tal Kalakh was an important point: the opposition in Syria is fluid in its allegiances. The US, Britain and the so-called 11-member “Friends of Syria”, who met in Doha last weekend, are to arm non-Islamic fundamentalist rebels, but there is no great chasm between them and those not linked to al-Qa’ida. One fighter with the al-Qa’ida-affiliated al-Nusra Front was reported to have defected to a more moderate group because he could not do without cigarettes. The fundamentalists pay more and, given the total impoverishment of so many Syrian families, the rebels will always be able to win more recruits. “Money counts for more than ideology,” a diplomat in Damascus told me.

A microcosm of Syrias only hope... the foreigners do not have Syrian interests at heart, be they Sunni or Shi'ite or Christian or Druze Syrians.

'If only they could both lose'

Henry Kissinger on the Iran Iraq war iirc.
 
Sharia spreads in Syria

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-23139784

This is what I have been warning about. This. is. what. I. have. been. warning. cunts. here. about. :mad:
The murder of a boy accused of blasphemy has come to symbolise concerns about the power of Islamist radicals in Syria's armed uprising. Paul Wood reports from Aleppo on how Sharia is spreading in rebel-held areas.

Recalling what happened next, she buries her face in her hands and weeps.
"One of them shouted: 'Whoever insults the Prophet will be killed according to Sharia'," she told me.
"I ran down barefoot to the streets. I heard the first shot. I fell to the ground when I got there.
"One of them shot him again and kicked him. He shot him for a third time and stamped on him.
"I said: 'Why are you killing him? He's still a child!' The man shouted: 'He is not a Muslim - leave!'"

:mad:

"We have no freedom left," says Mohammed's older brother, Fouad.
"We had it when the rebels first took over in Aleppo but now we have nothing. What we have instead are countless [Sharia] committees, each following its own interpretation of religion."

:mad:

Sheikh Abdullah takes a megaphone to address a small crowd that has gathered.
"In the name of God," he says, reading out the names of the four prisoners standing in a row. "Fifty lashes for the leader of the gang. Forty for each of his men."
He declares: "God's law is the best protection for the weak."
The first of the prisoners is forced to his knees, a man on either side of him holding his arms. When it starts some of the crowd chant, "The Prophet is our leader". Others just count the lashes.
:mad:
 
Sharia spreads in Syria

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-23139784

This is what I have been warning about. This. is. what. I. have. been. warning. cunts. here. about. :mad:
I saw that this morning, and wanted to post something about this. Most left commentators will say that such organisations are "reactionary". I, however, choose not to beat about the bush. These people are an ENEMY OF HUMANITY. Anyone who allies or appeases them are the enablers of ENEMIES OF HUMANITY. They should be as vehemently denounced and resisted against as the Assad regime and its cronies. If you are an atheist, feminist, homosexual, secularist, or non-Muslim or even the wrong kind of Muslim in the areas they have control these people will WANT YOU DEAD. They are very much an analogue to fascism in Europe, and any socialist whom actually believes in socialism would support and show solidarity with people resisting the imposition of this virulent toxic ideology on them, and I have no sympathy for anyone claiming to be on the left who would rather wring their hands lest they were seen as on the side of Assad or "Western imperialism" than stand up and oppose these VILE OPPRESSORS OF HUMANITY.
 
I saw that this morning, and wanted to post something about this. Most left commentators will say that such organisations are "reactionary". I, however, choose not to beat about the bush. These people are an ENEMY OF HUMANITY. Anyone who allies or appeases them are the enablers of ENEMIES OF HUMANITY. They should be as vehemently denounced and resisted against as the Assad regime and its cronies. If you are an atheist, feminist, homosexual, secularist, or non-Muslim or even the wrong kind of Muslim in the areas they have control these people will WANT YOU DEAD. They are very much an analogue to fascism in Europe, and any socialist whom actually believes in socialism would support and show solidarity with people resisting the imposition of this virulent toxic ideology on them, and I have no sympathy for anyone claiming to be on the left who would rather wring their hands lest they were seen as on the side of Assad or "Western imperialism" than stand up and oppose these VILE OPPRESSORS OF HUMANITY.


They are far worse than Assad, and they are the ones we are in the process of arming

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...already-sent-to-rebels-says-Lord-Ashdown.html

“They do not need arms. It is an unchallenged figure that 3,500 tons of arms have been shipped in by way of Croatia with the assistance of the CIA, funded by the Saudis, funded by the Qataris, going almost exclusively to the more jihadist groups,” the former international high representative for Bosnia said in a debate.
“I know where those weapons are coming from. They are the weapons left over from the Bosnian war. They are being shipped out in large measure through Croatian ports and airports and I can tell you they are making vast sums for corrupt forces in the Balkans.”
Lord Ashdown described the rebels as “not a fit and proper collection of people for us to be providing arms to”.
 
I saw that this morning, and wanted to post something about this. Most left commentators will say that such organisations are "reactionary". I, however, choose not to beat about the bush. These people are an ENEMY OF HUMANITY. Anyone who allies or appeases them are the enablers of ENEMIES OF HUMANITY. They should be as vehemently denounced and resisted against as the Assad regime and its cronies. If you are an atheist, feminist, homosexual, secularist, or non-Muslim or even the wrong kind of Muslim in the areas they have control these people will WANT YOU DEAD. They are very much an analogue to fascism in Europe, and any socialist whom actually believes in socialism would support and show solidarity with people resisting the imposition of this virulent toxic ideology on them, and I have no sympathy for anyone claiming to be on the left who would rather wring their hands lest they were seen as on the side of Assad or "Western imperialism" than stand up and oppose these VILE OPPRESSORS OF HUMANITY.

Assad is the person standing up to those cunts . Right now hes the only person who can hold syria together as a pluralist secular multi ethnic state and defeat these animals.

They should be as vehemently denounced and resisted against as the Assad regime and its cronies.

that doesnt make an ounce of sense
 
I have to wonder whether the new-found will by the likes of the BBC to focus on horrors in rebel controlled territory is a sign of the west hedging its bets. They have certainly polished their excuses should they decide not to intervene in Syria in a more dramatic way, and their public statements of commitment to helping rebel groups have been all over the shop, very mixed messages to say the least.
 
I have to wonder whether the new-found will by the likes of the BBC to focus on horrors in rebel controlled territory is a sign of the west hedging its bets. They have certainly polished their excuses should they decide not to intervene in Syria in a more dramatic way, and their public statements of commitment to helping rebel groups have been all over the shop, very mixed messages to say the least.

To speak of them as we speak of Russia, Iran and Syria...

They have probably calculated that the political fallout of their blatant backing of the rebels when the mass graves start to accumilate may threaten their own positions. Therefore Assadist momentum on the field has caused them (the BBC et al) to attempt to preserve their reputations (and the lifestyles to which they have become accustomed) in the face of history. They must be shown a strong and consistent hand to ensure they do not try to make and exploit further troubles in Syria.
 
A good article here not written for muppets (always nice)

http://syriareport.net/game-theory-v-syrias-reality/

Had the Obama Administration invested more time attempting to understand the person Bashar al-Asad, and the actual dynamics on the ground (as opposed to some abstract agent making decisions in the context of a propagandized idealization of the Syrian conflict), a number of critical facts would have been well-known: first, that the regime was not going to quickly crumble, as the dynamics favored the Syrian government over the rebels—both on the battlefield and in the hearts and minds of the Syrian people over the medium-to-long term. For these reasons, the opposition and their international backers should have been much more willing to engage with the regime’s constant outreach for dialogues, ceasefires, and negotiated settlements—and they should have been much more willing to comply with the UN’s repeated calls to de-escalate the conflict, rather than funding non-state actors in violation of international law.

Second, Bashar al-Asad intends to serve out the remainder of his term which ends in 2014; he is unlikely to step down before the end of his term, but has stated consistently that 2014 may be an opportune moment to initiate some kind of transition under the principal conditions that:

There is some kind of indigenous and domestically credible alternative to replace him, rather than expatriate elites supported by outside powers.
The situation “on the ground” is stable enough for a transition to be viable
Those parties interested in getting the president to step down should be focusing on meeting these criteria, working with the regime towards a 2014 transition. This method certainly holds more promise than a military “solution.”

Similarly, anyone who has followed Bashar al-Asad’s rhetoric closely should know that he is much more willing to reach out to the opposition and to offer concessions when negotiating from a position of strength—when his back is to the wall, he is likely to dig in and become more rigid, more defiant. Accordingly, should certain international players wish for the President to resign, they would have been better offering guarantees and incentives rather than threats and coercion.
 
Embedded media from this media site is no longer available

sounds like he is talking about contracts and rebuilding..:hmm:
 
Just the other week Morsi was giving it the big un, kicking the Syrian embassy out of Cairo and waffling on about Assads downfall, the whole region being against him etc . Now Morsis stitched up like a kipper in a republican guard romper room and the Saudis, Qataris and emirates are congratulating his successor :D

Seems like Assad cant resist having a good old gloat. In his latest speech he congratulates the Tahrir square protestors, points out that despite everything but the kitchen sink being chucked at him hes still there and wont be going until next year . And also proclaims the end of the Muslim brotherhood as a political force thats going anywhere, with secularism being the only way forward .

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2013/07/201374101640272185.html


Nice one bashar
 
No, not written for muppets.....for Assad:

From Wikipedia

53a373.png
 
You tried to pawn off an Assad propaganda article from as Assad newspaper as good & nice, as though it were a breath of fresh air. You got caught.


Ah... I see what's happened there, it's because you're an idiot.

Here's some stuff Assad said recently, happy to quote directly because the guy does make a few good points, certainly it's less squirmfull reading what Assad has to say than the mind-numbing incredibabbles Haque or Kerry come out with. Fat meaty quotes because the interview itself is quite long and full of good talking points but here's a selection for your consideration. Compare the rhetoric here to the message Western leaders are choosing to promote.

We often view nations as a group of people occupying a certain territory; whereas in fact a nation is about a sense of belonging and of culture which both ultimately form a collective identity. With a strong sense of belonging, we can ensure a united country that includes everyone. When the colonial powers left Syria, it was not to liberate the country but to reoccupy it through other means.

One of their core strategies was to divide and conquer. By division, I do not mean redrawing national borders but rather fragmentation of identity, which is far more dangerous.

When we live in the same territory but have different identities, we are already a divided country because each group isolates itself from the rest. When this happens, it is right to say that the country does not accommodate everyone.

In this context colonialism has been successful in creating separatist groups that consider their ideologies and values as solely and legitimately representing the country and hence rejecting all other groups. This success has not happened overnight, but rather during several stages.

Certainly, had we not feared this we would not have taken a strong stance against western policies that promoted this anarchy. We staunchly rejected the war on Iraq despite the serious American threats and great incentives at the time. We took this position not only because in principle we are against any aggression on Arab or friendly countries, but also because we were aware of the disastrous consequences that would follow.

Similarly we expressed concerns over the war on Afghanistan, especially during my meetings with American officials after 9/11. They expected us to be pleased that they would be attacking terrorists, especially since Syria from 1985 had repeatedly called for a clear definition of terrorism and the need to form an international alliance against it. This was not taken seriously at the time since terrorism had not yet struck within their borders. I have consistently warned American officials that the war on Afghanistan would promote and spread terrorism. Terrorism is like cancer, when you deal with the consequences rather than the root cause, it will only spread faster. Therefore, terrorism has to be rooted out and not just attacked. This cannot be achieved through war alone, but by education, culture, human interaction and prosperity. They did not pay attention to our concerns and we are still suffering from the consequences of Afghanistan. Again, in Iraq we warned that the situation would develop into sectarian tension and head towards partition, which we are slowly seeing. When we got involved in Lebanon in 1976 it was to protect Lebanon and also to safeguard Syria since that war had consequences on us from day one.

Therefore in answer to your question, we saw the dynamics you mentioned emerging, we stood against them and we intervened when it was warranted. However, you cannot completely isolate yourself from your neighbourhood. We endeavoured to prevent the events in Iraq from affecting Syria. It was possible to delay it but it was not possible to prevent it completely. Since 2004, some extremist elements started to emerge and ferment in Syria which at the beginning were non-Syrians and sadly with time a considerable part of them are now Syrian.

Interviewer: We have discussed the dialogue, done the groundwork, initiated the political process and taken some concrete steps, even clarified our position on the Geneva conference. To a large extent all of these measures are part of a wider political process. I would like to touch upon the humanitarian aspect: tolerance, forgiveness and reconciliation. Some have asked, Mr President, how can we reconcile both internally and externally?

President al-Assad: Internally speaking – and this is the most important for me – we mistakenly put all our eggs in the same basket. There are those who have killed, those who have vandalised but did not kill, there are those who carried arms but did not kill and those who facilitated the killing of others. So there are many different roles. In all instances that did not result in killing, the state can be lenient on the condition that offenders return to normal civilian life. In the instances of proven homicide, this is tied to the wishes of the victims’ families and the state cannot act on their behalf. However I have heard a significant number of families of martyrs, saying: “if our son’s or brother’s blood leads to a resolution of the problem then we are ready to forgive.” We must all learn from these families who have lost their children and their loved ones.

Forgiveness is essential in solving national crises, provided it is done at a popular level rather than at an official level in order to ensure its sustainability. It is a sign of strength and patriotism when we can put our national public interests above our own personal interests; this concept needs to be adopted by everybody. Like most other families, my family has been affected by the crisis, we have lost loved ones, but ultimately, similar to any other family, we need to put the interests of the country ahead of our personal loss. This needs to be applied both internally and externally.

The external side is more political. Foreign policy is not based on emotions but national interests. There are principles and interests and they are inextricably intertwined. It is unscrupulous for your principles to be against your interests, either your interests are wrong or your principles. Here, forgiveness is viewed positively as a humane and religious value. When forgiveness serves the relationships with a certain country, and therefore the interests of Syrians, there is no reason not to forgive, since the central focus of the state is the interest of its people. This is what we have done; we have received many politicians and met with several countries that were hostile to us. Our primary aim was always the unequivocal interest of the Syrian people.

From Regime mouth-peice al-Thawra, plenty more where that came from.
 
From Regime mouth-peice al-Thawra, plenty more where that came from.
I bet there is a whole lot more. Since Assad began massacring thousands of innocent people over 2 years ago, he's had his propaganda organs working overtime trying to justify it. And you'll lap up every bit as though it were some deep philosophical truth. I see you're now being more candid about the nature of the sources of the articles you post. Some progress anyway.
 
I bet there is a whole lot more. Since Assad began massacring thousands of innocent people over 2 years ago, he's had his propaganda organs working overtime trying to justify it. And you'll lap up every bit as though it were some deep philosophical truth. I see you're now being more candid about the nature of the sources of the articles you post. Some progress anyway.

either address the issues raised or stfu

the only thing youve exposed is your own inanity , as seen by your complete inability to address the issues in the interview

this is just inane noise, chronic mountebankery. Plese desist with the buffoonery .
 
either address the issues raised or stfu

the only thing youve exposed is your own inanity , as seen by your complete inability to address the issues in the interview

this is just inane noise, chronic mountebankery. Plese desist with the buffoonery .
Comedian, trying to issue instructions on what others should say after you cheer on a vicious dictator & another posts an article he hopes won't be found out to be a propaganda sheet of that dictator.
 

anyways, newswise . Homs has all but been liberated by the Syrian Arab Army , bar the shouting . Meanwhile the opposition .Al qaeda versus the FSA..have been busy blowing the shite out of each other around Alleppo . Dozens dead apparently with AQ setting up an emirate in the villages close to the Turkish border .It appears they massacred demonstrators who were complaining about having to live under sharia, forced amputations and the like . Theyre also claiming the FSA recently sold them 200 anti aircraft and anti tank missiles. The faction fighting among the SNC in Istanbul is simply manifesting itself on the field. And the idea that moderate Syrian rebels can be supplied without it falling into AQ hands just exposed as utter fallacy . Either AQ will simply buy the gear from those its been supplied to or theyll take it by force .

Meanwhile back in Damascus Assad has announced a major cabinet reshuffle, with the departure of the entire Ba*ath old guard from his sixteen strong cabinet and their replacement by new younger faces more representative of the partys grass roots . For the first time ever it means none of his cabinet is a member of the countrys intelligence services . Its also felt to be a major concession towards the partys grass roots who were heavily critical of the initial handling of the protests some years back .

So he seems to have gotten his house well and truly in order, the tide is definitely being irrevocably turned against the upstarts with another major strategic loss . While the upstarts are busy killing each other and setting up medievalist caliphates in their remaining strongholds. Added to that the disarray of the Muslim Brotherhood and the massive reverse theyve just suffered in Egypt finishing them as a political force in the region . Victory may be a long way away but at least its now in sight.​
 
Another Leader Quits Post in Syrian Exile Group
NYTimes. July 8, 2013
The main Syrian exile opposition group suffered new turbulence at the top on Monday, when the prime minister of its still-notional interim government resigned.

The resignation came two days after the opposition group elected a new president as it tries to unify and arm the rebels fighting the government of President Bashar al-Assad and to help civilians in rebel-held areas of Syria.

The prime minister, Ghassan Hitto, was appointed in March to assemble an administration that would govern rebel-held territory. It was not immediately clear why he resigned.
Mr. Hitto, a naturalized American citizen from Damascus who lived in Texas for years, was seen by American officials as a capable technocrat. He helped manage the exile group's humanitarian aid effort, visited rebel-held areas several times and urged his colleagues in the opposition group to visit as well.

But he faced several challenges: despite the visits, he was seen by some rebels and activists as out of touch with the country, and some members of the often-squabbling coalition complained that he was a favorite of the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood and of its main foreign backer, Qatar. Many in the Syrian opposition say Qatar wields too much influence in the movement.
The Muslim Brotherhood and Qatar are on the back foot.
 
Comedian, trying to issue instructions on what others should say after you cheer on a vicious dictator & another posts an article he hopes won't be found out to be a propaganda sheet of that dictator.

Actually the post you claim is propaganda from al-Thawha was from syriareport.net, I'm not aware of any connection with al-Thawha, I came across the article on Reddit and being interested in the information I linked to it here. If it's propaganda, so be it... you can tell a lot about a regime by its propaganda.

After you whined about it though I explicitly posted an article by al-Thawha, the contents a speech by Assad himself, I'm still happy to stand up and clap in front of everyone. For the most part, his concept of secularism for instance is strong and well grounded but heavy with regime agenda the way he seeks to justify state 'guidance' of religion for instance to keep it out of politics (which I agree with but from a different direction). Most of it however I agree with in relation to the noise coming from the likes of you. I am capable of it then, reading something, engaging with it, agreeing or disagreeing with various parts etc.

I'd be happy to listen to the propaganda you come out with and scan it for any sense whatsoever, taking it at face value and engaging with the arguments made... but for the most part I've found it an appalling waste of time. The propaganda you endorse (that of the Great Rightwing Regime in the North as I like to call it) is so full of contortions of reason it'd be laughable if it weren't so sad for the Syrian people. FFS at least don't insult peoples intelligence by making the argument that hosing a burning building with gasoline will help end the fire, or that ragtag bands of sectarian jihadists and petro-monarch sponsored mercs are the path to democracy, freedom and peace. Freedom maybe, freedom for the dogs of war to snack on some guys lung anyway.

In short, Assad has far more to bring to the conversation than you, it doesn't surprise me you stick your fingers in your ears and babble about the 'p' word in response.
 
According to this Al-Jazeera report the FSA have begun selling their Western-purchased arms to Al-Queada

Embedded media from this media site is no longer available

And according to this, presumably pro-regime (uh-oh better not show TomUS) TV station here's footage of the Syrian Arab Army capturing some western-purchased arms off a group of rebels they've just killed

Embedded media from this media site is no longer available

This would appear to confirm the fears Robert Fisk raised a few weeks ago in this article http://www.independent.co.uk/voices...t-just-guns-they-are-about-money-8659784.html

Anyone who believes this knows nothing about war, killing, barbarity and, especially, greed. Because weapons are not just guns. They are currency. They are money. They are saleable commodities the moment you send them across any border. Their value in US dollars, pounds sterling, Syrian pounds or Qatari dinars is infinitely more important than their use in battle.

The Western powers are dangerously close to flooding Syria with weapons and ammunition which will officially go to the nice rebels – but will quickly pass to the horrid rebels, who will sell some of them to al-Qa’ida, Iraqi insurgents, Syrian government troops, Malian militiamen, Taliban fighters and Pakistani hitmen. Guns are about money.
 
good post delroy but pretty much all that gear is of Russian type or origin , definitely not western. Id suspect collected Libyan stockpiles, which NATO took some responsibility for, being supplied as non attributable through the backdoor. Definitely some SAM missiles there which is quite worrying as the captured documents look very much like they were in AQ hands.

Anyways more interesting news . Russia is stating categorically that they have proof the rebels have used chemical weapons . And unlike the ropey claims of the yanks, brits and french who are keeping their supposed evidence secret, Russia is also announcing they will be making their proof public and open to examination, and are also taking it to the UN . Unfortunately it pretty much has to be shoved in the UNs face . The UN inspectors have refused to go to Syria despite being invited to do so by Assad to investigate the alleged use of chemical weapons . The UN claim they wont go because Assad refuses to give them a carte blanche to go wherever in Syria they like..which they know Assad wont submit to as a demand.The fact is they didnt want to be coming back with some very unpopular news for western leaders . So Russia has gone and collected it for them and brought it to them .

The imminent hypocrisy will be quite interesting .
 
At the very least 5,000 foreign Sunni Islamist fighters in Syria:

Taken together, these statements will also produce more Sunni war volunteers for the battle in Syria -- which would be less of a concern if Syria were not already teeming with foreign fighters. According to data that we have collected over the past nine months from hundreds of primary and secondary sources, about 5,000 Sunni fighters from more than 60 different countries have joined the Syrian rebels since the uprising began in 2011. This makes Syria the second-largest foreign-fighter destination in the history of modern Islamism. (In the 1980s, the Afghan jihad drew approximately 10,000 volunteers but over a period of ten years.)
 
At the very least 5,000 foreign Sunni Islamist fighters in Syria:
That's not many compared to the Syrian military estimated to be over 700,000.
With its headquarters in Damascus, the Syrian military consists of air, ground, and navy forces. Active personnel were estimated as 295,000 in 2011, with an additional 314,000 reserves. Paramilitary forces were estimated at 108,000 in 2011.[26]
Also interesting is how heavily Alawite it is, especially the leadership & career soldiers. This is a war between a ruling minority & a majority.
The majority of the Syrian military are Sunni, but most of the military leadership are Alawites. Alawites make up 12 percent of the Syrian population but are estimated to make up 70 percent of the career soldiers in the Syrian Army.[10][27] Of the 200,000 or so career soldiers in the Syrian Army, 140,000 are Alawites.[28] A similar imbalance is seen in the officer corps where some 80 percent of the officers are Alawites. The military’s most elite divisions, the Republican Guard and the 4th Mechanized Division, which are commanded by Bashar's brother, are exclusively Alawite. Most of Syria’s 300,000 conscripts and air force pilots are, however, Sunni.[10][29] Because of the Alawite composition of the Syrian armed forces, its interests are closely aligned with those of President Bashar al-Assad and the Assad family.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syrian_Armed_Forces
 
clare daly...originally elected as Socialist Party trot but then got totally fucked off with them and went independent . Much to their chagrin .
you just missed RT doing a long interview with her there . I like her a lot .
 
Back
Top Bottom