camouflage
gaslit at scale.
Maybe you would care to explain, if regime change is the agenda, why the imperialist west have done fuck all to realise it?
...stunned silence.
Maybe you would care to explain, if regime change is the agenda, why the imperialist west have done fuck all to realise it?
Maybe you would care to explain, if regime change is the agenda, why the imperialist west have done fuck all to realise it?
I have not been solely using western MSM to base my opinions on but reports from Medicins sans Frontiers, Syria Direct and activists on Twitter, who guess what? Are actually there. Also whether you like it or no I suspect my critical faculties are a tad more incisive than yours. The evidence is overwhelming.
There has been rather a large if unsuccessful covert intervention in Syria it just hasn't involved directly obliterating the Syrian state with US airpower. The US did lead the charge in insisting Assad must go but rapidly lost the taste for it. It being (another) rather fuck witted enterprise in which US interests were not at all salient.Maybe you would care to explain, if regime change is the agenda, why the imperialist west have done fuck all to realise it?
I have not been solely using western MSM to base my opinions on but reports from Medicins sans Frontiers, Syria Direct and activists on Twitter, who guess what? Are actually there. Also whether you like it or no I suspect my critical faculties are a tad more incisive than yours. The evidence is overwhelming.
MSF is the most compelling I admit, but like HRW these organisations are not immune to being used or represented in different ways. Syria Direct and activists... fuck knows what those consist of. Its a function of your opinion that you take what they show and tell you at face value and that's fair enough, it's a complex issue.
MSF is the most compelling I admit, but like HRW these organisations are not immune to being used or represented in different ways. Syria Direct and activists... fuck knows what those consist of. Its a function of your opinion that you take what they show and tell you at face value and that's fair enough, it's a complex issue.
Hell-cannons and mortars fired at civilian areas on the other hand are given a pass.
If only there were fairly large numbers of Syrians current residing in the U.K. that could tell us what has been going on there for the past 4 years.MSF is the most compelling I admit, but like HRW these organisations are not immune to being used or represented in different ways. Syria Direct and activists... fuck knows what those consist of. Its a function of your opinion that you take what they show and tell you at face value and that's fair enough, it's a complex issue.
You can't separate highly reactionary political Islam from the rising in Syria. With these thing the unthreatening sea goes out and a tsunami comes in. The Arab Spring upheavals in Syria had essentially failed by 2012 and increasingly they became something new. Like the Bolsheviks in 1916 Political Islam may not have represented the messy will of a popular call for an end to practical serfdom but they had force and direction. It was a major mode of opposition organisation (or disorganisation) with many rival strands. Unusually it was a diverse revolt of the provinces not so popular in Syria's great cities. It faced considerable resistance from regime supporters cheering on Baathist brutality and a wider urban society simply not much liking the look of the often rural rebels. Something the usual policy establishment narrative has ignored....
The Syrian revolution was indeed betrayed; by petty interest and myopic vision for sure, but first and foremost by Islamism in all of its expressions. The desire of the Syrian population to assert its dignity, freedom, and longing for political justice was hijacked by the stealth effort of local ideological Islamists, stemming from the Muslim Brothers, aiming to settle scores with the despotic regime for its repression of their movement in past decades. But, by many more orders of magnitude, the betrayal came in the form of an international jihadism claiming to come to the rescue of victimized Muslims, only to inflict upon all Syrians its own alien and brutal vision of religious regimentation and depraved punishment. Young men from Chinese Xin Jiang, Russian Dagestan, or the Parisian banlieues competing in their suicide attacks to eradicate rival radical factions on Syrian soil cannot be ignored as a primary factor in the Syrian revolution's derailing and Syrian society's suffering. Any hope of recovery for the Syrian revolution is premised on the re-Syrianization of its goals, actions, and participants. It is a hope that is still awaiting a vehicle for its expression; it is nonetheless clear, in light of the indelible history of brutalization and rampant factionalism, that there can be no lasting rehabilitation of the regime. The Syrian revolution will continue to metastasize. The direction of its transformation will be shaped by lessons learned -- or not -- from the current failures.
...
Iranians haggling as usual....
An initial deal that would have seen thousands of civilians and opposition fighters granted safe passage out of the city stalled on Wednesday, and the planned evacuation failed to happen.
Iran, one of Mr Assad's main backers, imposed new conditions, saying it wanted the simultaneous evacuation of wounded from two villages besieged by rebels, according to rebel and United Nations sources.
But Abdul Salam Abdul Razak, a military spokesman for the Nour al-Din al Zinki rebel group, said a new agreement had been reached which included those villages in Idlib province.
"Within the coming hours its implementation will begin," he said.
An official in the Jabha Shamiya rebel group said implementation would begin about 3:00pm (AEDT) today.
An official in the pro-Damascus military alliance confirmed the truce deal was on, and said about 15,000 people would be evacuated from the majority Shi'ite villages, Foua and Kefraya, in return for the evacuation from Aleppo of "militants and their families and whoever wants to leave among civilians".
He said those leaving Aleppo would head for the Idlib province, west of the city.
The Jabha Shamiya official however denied that 15,000 people would leave the two villages and said only the wounded would be evacuated.
It was not immediately clear how the deal had been reached.
...
...
In short, the case of Usud al-Cherubim provides an interesting case of evolution from a local initiative to an affiliate of a wider militia conglomeration attached to the air intelligence. The existence of Usud al-Cherubim also illustrates that notions of defence of holy sites as rallying calls are by no means limited to the Shi’a alone. Indeed, as the case of the Syriac Military Council demonstrates, the idea of defending churches and other holy sites from desecration and destruction has been an important talking point among Christians in the east of the country as well.
Of course, Usud al-Cherubim goes beyond mere defence of the Deir al-Cherubim monastery, and has been actively fighting for the regime elsewhere in western Syria. The developments surrounding Guardians of the Dawn also point to wider trends among pro-Assad militias: namely, a desire to assert political influence (while not threatening Assad’s position as president of Syria) and competition for power on the ground (which, in the case of the various intelligence agencies in particular, also represents continuity with the past).
That Iranian revolutionary urge to keep the imperial powers at arms length....
Iran's challenges
Iran faces its own challenges, not least because of uncertainty about how a new US administration under Donald Trump may improve ties with Russia at Iran’s expense. So it, too, is inclined to seek a political solution.
“The perception in Tehran is there is no military ending in Syria,” says Nasser Hadian-Jazy, a political scientist at Tehran University.
“In other words, it is a good time to go for a negotiated solution, because from a position of strength it is easier to convince Assad to give concessions, rather than a position of weakness,” says Mr. Hadian-Jazy.
Though some conservative factions in Iran revel in the Aleppo victory of “resistance,” that view “is not going to be shared … universally,” he says.
“Our forces are overstretched. We know there is no light at the end of the tunnel,” says Hadian-Jazy. “Any tactical closeness of Russia and the US may hurt Iran, [so] our preference would be to quickly turn that victory into a negotiated solution.”
Turkish state media presenting a sectarian face that might play well with Trump....
Having admitted 3 million Syrian refugees and spent close to $15 billion for relief efforts since 2011, Turkey responded to the humanitarian crisis in eastern Aleppo by taking initiative and working with Moscow to find a middle ground. Negotiations held by the Turkish intelligence and the Russian military were intended to prevent the next Srebrenica, while Washington and Brussels opted to watch a bloodthirsty regime massacre innocent people and destroy one of the world heritage cities – as they did in places like former Yugoslavia and Rwanda. Meanwhile, thousands of people gathered outside the diplomatic missions of Russia, Syria and Iran to protest what looked like a 21st century "final solution."
The collapse of the cease-fire agreement should be studied carefully by the Russian leadership. The simple lesson from the past 48 hours is that Assad is not a reliable ally for Moscow. Having bowed to the Kremlin's pressure to abide by the agreement, the Syrian regime played Iran against Russia to continue killing innocent people. To make matters worse, the Russians should also face the fact that they cannot keep a lid on Iran's influence on Syria anymore. At the end of the day, Assad and Tehran made Russian President Vladimir Putin look like a weak leader who cannot deliver his promises – under the watchful eyes of the entire world. It is time for the Kremlin to reconsider their support for the murderer in Damascus.
If you happen to dislike Russia's Middle East policy, you should be really worried about U.S. President Barack Obama's legacy – at least the Russians have courage to talk straight. For years, the Obama administration appeased the Iranian regime and created an echo chamber to present a disastrous foreign policy as a successful initiative. Mistaking PR stunts for actual policy, the White House allowed Tehran get away with a rogue nuclear program. At the same time, Mr. Obama outsourced part of the counterterrorism effort in Syria to Iranian-backed Shiite militias – who now want to exterminate the civilian population of Aleppo because they happen to be Sunni Muslims. Moving forward, Washington's only choice is to acknowledge Mr. Obama's mistakes and support efforts to broker a cease-fire in Syria.
...
Obviously Assad just loves IS massacring a few hundred of his hapless soldiers hung out to dry by retreating Russians and making him look like a pussy after losing Palmyra twice....
With the Syrian army depleted by losses and a shrinking draft base, and with the Syrian campaign proving increasingly costly for both Russia and Iran, the setback in Palmyra shows the fundamental weakness of the regime and its allies, some Arab officials say. That weakness, in turn, offers a glimmer of hope that another escalation of the war against the opposition could be prevented, they add.
“The only thing that would help in putting an end to the war is that the ability of Russia and Iran—and of the regime itself—to continue the war is not unlimited because of economic reasons,” said Fouad Siniora, the former prime minister of Lebanon and the head of the Sunni Future bloc in the Lebanese parliament.
Critics of the Syrian regime, however, suggest that more sinister motives may have been in play in Palmyra.
At a time when the world’s attention is focused on the brutality of government troops in Aleppo, they say, the sudden reappearance of bearded Islamic State militants in the storied town served as a convenient reminder that, in the greater scheme of things, Mr. Assad is meant to represent the lesser evil.
“Daesh was always a boon for the Syrian government,” said Abdelaziz Aluwaisheg, assistant secretary-general for political affairs at the Gulf Cooperation Council, which unites Saudi Arabia and five other Gulf monarchies. “They are using Daesh to change the terms of the conflict, from the fight of the people against a despotic, fascist regime to a fight against terrorism.”
Bana the indestructible ?
There is some precedent for such cynicism, and a notable example also had a Syrian connection. In 2011, a woman who described herself as a lesbian blogger using the pseudonym Amina Arraf wrote about political persecution in Damascus, the capital, and suddenly disappeared.
The “gay girl in Damascus,” as the blogger came to be known, turned out to be a 40-year-old American man from Georgia.
International aid advocates have expressed mixed feelings about Bana’s fame — satisfaction that she has increased global sympathy for child victims in Syria, but concern that her story, as presented on Twitter, may not be entirely accurate
Kathleen Bartzen Culver, the director for the Center for Journalism Ethics at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, said some news outlets, including morning network news shows in the United States, seemed to have “suspended skepticism.”
Bana Al-Abed is a real 7 year-old child who resides in East Aleppo.
Her Twitter and Periscope accounts have consistently posted videos from the same locations in East Aleppo.
Her accounts are run by her mother, Fatimah.
Fatimah has experience of journalism and appears to be very social-media savvy.
Bana and her mother have come under sustained attack from critics using lies, misinformation and deliberate misunderstanding in order to delegitimise them.
By far the most likely scenario is that @AlabedBana is an account run by Fatemah which tells the story of her daughter, a young child in East Aleppo. This story cannot be told without including the daily horrors which affect the residents of that city. This in itself does not make @AlabedBana some kind of Jihadi plot, nor a propaganda account seeking to spread a false narrative: due to the events occurring in Aleppo, any account of daily life becomes inherently political. The account has posted more obvious political messages, as well as occasional frustrated outbursts, but for the majority of its existence it has posted the simple hopes and fears of a young girl and her mother. Bombs are falling on East Aleppo and young children are suffering, and Bana represents a microcosm of that suffering.
In the same way, the fact that Fatemah, who clearly and openly runs this account, is adept at using social-media, and posts from a particular viewpoint, does not necessarily discredit this account either: being adroit at informing the world about the plight of those in East Aleppo does nothing to detract from that suffering. Some have argued that Fatemah has used Bana in an exploitative manner, and while the mix of political statements and simplistic messages could certainly be criticised, it appears to be an entirely rational approach for a family attempting to raise awareness of the dire situation in East Aleppo.
Unless one lacks any kind of empathy, it is clear that @AlabedBana is an attempt to show the world an aspect of the suffering of real people in a real situation, including their fear of death and frustrated outbursts. Putting aside political affiliations and partisan politics, it is impossible to reject the truth that there is a small girl called Bana suffering under the fear of death because of the conflict in Aleppo, an existence shared by many other children on all sides across this conflict.