Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Alex Callinicos/SWP vs Laurie Penny/New Statesman Facebook handbags

Status
Not open for further replies.
Lots and lots of "quotes" in the article.

What an utterly pointless piece, useful only to allow Laura to situate and sell herself as an anti-fascist. Nothing else - apart from feeding the yuppy-vice far-right obsession.

edit: oh yeah, and that laura thinks that you can't be w/c and dress nice or have a nice car, you must live in some crack-hovel and have mud and old fish in your hair or something.
 
i got interviewed by vice the other day. in order to avoid getting sneered at on the website, i gave sensible boring answers and told them to get to fuck when they asked me stupid questions. it worked, because they didn't use it. tommy should have used the same method.
 
Sunday supplement style interview (with an added cringeworthy attempt at AFA style humour?!) She worked so hard to find out such an acute observer of the contemporary British far right - er, her boss.
 
Sunday supplement style interview (with an added cringeworthy attempt at AFA style humour?!) She worked so hard to find out such an acute observer of the contemporary British far right - er, her boss.
I was going to pick upon the Trilling stuff as well - reminiscent of the Guardian piece about being on benefits (by a usually decent journo) and the subject of the interview just by chance happened to be Laura, a Guardian writer.
 
mind you, Tommy couldn't have used the same method, because he's an idiot. I liked the bit about Bradford Paki. Nothing wrong with that per se, but nothing actually right either. Just fluff, saying lots of things without saying anything. But are the EDL a spent force or not? Are the guys running it 'brains' or idiots? Cannae have it both ways.
 
Men and women and children of all ages and races sit down in the road to block the route of a phalanx of white guys who, despite what their website says, are doing a terrible job of not looking like your stereotypical fascist skinheads. Hamid grins. He knows that, for now, Unite Against Fascism and other anti-racist groups have won the battle on the streets.

:facepalm:
 
Men and women and children of all ages and races sit down in the road to block the route of a phalanx of white guys who, despite what their website says, are doing a terrible job of not looking like your stereotypical fascist skinheads. Hamid grins. He knows that, for now, Unite Against Fascism and other anti-racist groups have won the battle on the streets.

:facepalm:

Bloody chavs.
 
are doing a terrible job of not looking like your stereotypical fascist skinheads

The your here means hers, and the hobgoblins of official middle class anti-fascism, as well as the usual unspoken social prejudices of many people from that section of society.
 
Brave, intrepid Laurie. Boldly going into a pub to interview EDL leaders where no brave intrepid upper class Oxbridge journo has gone before.
 
"When the opportunity to do this interview came up, I hesitated. As a reporter, I was fascinated by the possibility of getting to see the pocks and pores on the human face of British fascism, but as an anti-fascist, I’m aware that UK organisers have maintained a long tradition of refusing to grant any sort of media or speaking platform to the far-right. The "no platform" principle keeps right-wing extremists on the fringe by denying them the legitimacy they crave. No room for racists, neither in the public conversation nor on the streets. It’s part of a strategy that has been successful in driving back wave after wave of far-right organisations in this country down the years.

So, that’s one reason that this interview will not reproduce any of Stephen Yaxley-Lennon’s actual opinions about Muslims, immigrants and people of other faiths in Britain. The other reason is that his actual opinions are boring and predictable."

1. UK organisers?
2. What is the point of interviewing someone if you are not going to publish any of his opinions?
 
There are more interesting questions – such as why a man who claims to be an authentic, representative voice of “working class” Britain turns up to a meeting in a shiny new BMW 1 series with leather seats, kitted out from top to toe in designer sports gear and reeking of posh cologne.

There are more interesting questions - such as why a woman who claims to be an authentic, representative voice of "in brackets" sub-divisions of society turns up in a range of publications with shiny sixth form prose, kitted out in a less believable Theroux faux naivete and reeking of the greek studying student Jarvis Cocker sings about in Common People.
 
It's like trash tv - you know when you can predict with accuracy the next step of the article - how there'll be a switch from one to another, actually answering a rhetorical question or bringing in an asian student to the discussion. As played out as the constant woes in Walford. Good journalism should lead you either somewhere you didn't expect or reveal something you didn't know - but it shouldn't so obviously show off that the hack has seen tricks done, and is attempting them in their own work.
 
Crouched? He put his feet on the table? Eurgh!

This is someone crouching laura:

kissena-classic-crouched.jpg
 
1. UK organisers?

For Laura, one cannot be an anti-fascist without belonging to an organisation. Surely you are aware, comrade, that unless you belong to UAF or HnH you are not a true anti-fascist?

2. What is the point of interviewing someone if you are not going to publish any of his opinions?

To make yourself look like something you're not - a decent journalist who reports news, not yourself. :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom