I'm catching up the last fortnight or so of meanderings of this thread, so this is out of sequence,
Do any of the intellectually/educationally privileged here know if there's been any contemporary examination of the politics of the toilet, taking the intersections into account? Preferably without lavatory 'humour'.
There's obvious scope for looking at the class and gender dimensions of provision, and the expectations contained in language (lavatory/loo/bog) and at toilets for those with disabilities. And then there's the (imo utterly disgusting and uncivilised) attrition of the formerly widespread public toilet, now judged for their profit/loss rather than as a public service and largely outsourced to 'for customer only' pubs and cafes. Provision of public drinking water comes into that too- few parks seem to have old fashioned drinking fountains these days. And then there's the politics of what gets scrawled on the walls. I've never previously really thought about toilet arrangements for transgendered people, but there's clearly a (political) issue there.
Beyond that, in this country there's an almost universal concept of what a toilet is and should be. Around the world plenty of cultures prefer to squat rather than sit, aim at the floor not the wall, use a bidet in preference to paper and (for all I know) probably much else besides. Are universities and other places where there are high numbers of (for want of a better word) foreigners, or of locals with different cultural expectations, making any efforts to cater for their preferences? If not, why not?
There must be some carbon/energy/sewage farm efficiency implications of paper-v-water, and maybe health stats relating to squatting-v-sitting.
Has anyone published on the politics of all this?