That people are daft enough to pay him ought to tell us something.
What does it tell us Ronaldo? That's the interesting bit. Us having a whinge about Malcolm Harris for our own amusement is peripheral to what this thread's about, for all the reasons you've mentioned. But the issue of "why he was getting touted around charging $5k to speak" is a genuinely important one - what say you Ronaldo? Anything political to add to this?
I'm all in favor of depersonalising the content of this thread because Laurie Penny's become a bit of a lightning rod for criticism because she's an archetype, someone who exemplifies much wider issues surrounding role the mass media play in buttressing a capitalist economic system, and these are issues that will have a tangible impact on a w/c political regroupment in the near future. It's better to de-personalise it, even if taking the piss out of posh kids is good sport and provides a bit of a laugh for us on here, because it's not about the individuals and besides Laurie Penny really does get a chorus of sexist abuse that's pretty vile, so depersonalising it is fine with me. It's always worth remembering that even if she'd never been born it would've made little difference to these tendencies, there's no shortage of worthy middle-class kids who'd crawl through a sewage pipe to get the paid gig at the new statesmam who'd fulfill the exact same role as her given half a chance. I follow a few of them on twitter, it's hilarious.
Thing is it's hard not to make it personal when that individual slanders those who disagree with her as racist and sexist to obfuscate the substantive criticism that exists of her professional work and how her career is an excellent example of the class politics at work in the media. It's hard not take it personally when you hear her come out with the "some of us have jobs y'know" line when your unemployed. It's astonishing how quickly the mask of radicalism slips and the inner Tory comes out when challenged by those beneath her. It's hard not to take it personally when you get called a racist in public after a lifetime of militant anti-fascism, and I'm sure it's very galling for the women on here (many of whom have been involved in grassroots feminist politics for much longer than Laurie Penny) are dismissed as middle-aged sexist blokes on a par with those wishing rape and other graphic sexual violence on Don't Start Me Off or Guido Fawkes comments etc. These are vile slurs, made by someone with a platform in the bourgeois media, made safe in the knowledge those who are the victims lack the means by which to defend themselves. Then again this thread contains dozens of examples and lots of background information that over time is going to make it harder for her to do her job. The gig at the indepedent didn't go to well, I suspect, based widespread rumour, they were less willing to indulge the incredible co-incidences that make up much of her output. If I was a fraud and charlatan, and if my ability to earn a crust was being jeopardised by a load of no-marks combing through my journalistic output looking for falsehoods, and the only way to diffuse that is to accuse those participating of being motivated by crude sexism and a dislike of women in the media, then I'd do it. Everyone's gotta eat - that's why class politics is so fundamental
Laurie Penny's prominence as a left-wing spokesperson is triumph of how far you can get in this country if you go to the right school, get a degree from Oxford or Cambridge and ruthlessly network yourelf as much possible, despite having nothing of much value to say. That's the interesting thing for me. And that's something which doesn't really revolve around Penny it could quite clearly be some other chump.
ALSO: Just as a giggle does she really go around the USA telling people that's she's a normal w/c girl who got a scholarship? hahaha god I hope it is, I bet some of these idiots really do fall for that.