Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Alex Callinicos/SWP vs Laurie Penny/New Statesman Facebook handbags

Status
Not open for further replies.
Much as I'm enjoying the show, I have to admit that I missed some key information from the start of this episode: Why do we hate this Malcolm dude in the first place? Can someone give me the Cliff Notes version? Isn't he just some guy who puts out a minor social democratic magazine?

Mere Pseud Mag. Ed.

 
Laurie Penny steps in to defend Malcolm Harris whilst still maintaining she's better than us.

https://twitter.com/PennyRed/status/328678224643108867

Why does she feel the need to defend him? Doesnt she know he's not bovvered? Reads more like she's trying to persuade convince herself not him.

If I could be arsed and I wasn't on my phone I'd gather up the dodgy homophobia and misogyny apologist quotes sihhi found and quote them next to that tweet.

This says all you need to know about Laurie and what her 'principals' really mean.

Double standards.

Let's look at a contrast. Class based critique of liberal state multiculturalism by the iwca is racist. Even tweeting it is enough to be denounced as such. When there's nothing remotely racist about it. And she won't withdraw the accusation, even when she knows it to be untrue, until she's threatened with legal action.

Someone writes a load of homophobia and misogyny apologetics and writes stuff about little girls and he gets defended from the nasty urbanites.

Difficult not to come to the conclusion that since he's well connected and mixes in the same circles, comes from a similar background, she must defend him. We're just smelly proles who don't even have a column so its fine to slander us to deflect criticism.

I reckon shes very class conscious. Just not in the way shed like us to think.
 
A group of working class women was stood on the pavement witnessing the march, and through their mockery were defining themselves outside of what it represented, laughing among themselves and saying the marchers weren't workers but a load of hippies.
Just proves you get ignorant bigots everywhere. Even among the working class!
 
Why does she feel the need to defend him? Doesnt she know he's not bovvered? Reads more like she's trying to persuade convince herself not him.

If I could be arsed and I wasn't on my phone I'd gather up the dodgy homophobia and misogyny apologist quotes sihhi found and quote them next to that tweet.

This says all you need to know about Laurie and what her 'principals' really mean.

Double standards.

Let's look at a contrast. Class based critique of liberal state multiculturalism by the iwca is racist. Even tweeting it is enough to be denounced as such. When there's nothing remotely racist about it. And she won't withdraw the accusation, even when she knows it to be untrue, until she's threatened with legal action.

Someone writes a load of homophobia and misogyny apologetics and writes stuff about little girls and he gets defended from the nasty urbanites.

Difficult not to come to the conclusion that since he's well connected and mixes in the same circles, comes from a similar background, she must defend him. We're just smelly proles who don't even have a column so its fine to slander us to deflect criticism.

I reckon shes very class conscious. Just not in the way shed like us to think.
I used to think she at least had some decent feminist principles, but by associating herself with Molly, poor women should just monetise their hotness, Crabapple and Malcolm, I wanted to shag Ema Watson even before she had breasts, Harris she loses any feminist credibility she had. She is about as feminist as Hugh Hefner. Which just makes it even more laughable when she accuses people on here of misogyny, when every poster on this thread, well almost everyone, has a better understanding of what it is to be a feminist than she will ever have.
 
Sorry to disappoint you, but I'm just an everyday average lurker. I chose the name because it was funny and stuff. (Sending a PM to Frogwoman to confirm as she knows me from elsewhere). :p
freddie-so-close.png
 
Is there any chance of "compiling the list" in an easy access form?

e.g.

Laurie Penny The New Statesman, twitter. Privately educated, plagiarising, lying parasite. called Urban racist and misogynist
Molly Crabapple artworld, twitter. "monetize your hotness", parasite.
Malcolm Harris New Inquiry, #OWS, twitter. $5000 to talk about #OWS, parasite, sleaze/borderline nonce.
Owen Jones The Independent. Nice lad but waay to close to bubble commentariat. Dresses Labour apologism in "lefty Boy next door" guise.
Johann Hari The Independent. Plagiarist and liar.

and so on. Nice hyperlinks to tiwtter feed, main crimes, main media outlets etc. Kept in a single, regularly bumped post?

It's make life easier.
 
Is there any chance of "compiling the list" in an easy access form?

e.g.

Laurie Penny The New Statesman, twitter. Privately educated, plagiarising, lying parasite. called Urban racist and misogynist
Molly Crabapple artworld, twitter. "monetize your hotness", parasite.
Malcolm Harris New Inquiry, #OWS, twitter. $5000 to talk about #OWS, parasite, sleaze/borderline nonce.
Owen Jones The Independent. Nice lad but waay to close to bubble commentariat. Dresses Labour apologism in "lefty Boy next door" guise.
Johann Hari The Independent. Plagiarist and liar.

and so on. Nice hyperlinks to tiwtter feed, main crimes, main media outlets etc. Kept in a single, regularly bumped post?

It's make life easier.

I favour an e-book exposing the whole rotten crowd, but titled Pants on Fire: The Laurie Penny Papers
 
I would also argue that making creepy remarks like "keeping your daughters off the cam is like keeping them off the pole" and quoting approvingly from Hakim Bey and the like is pretty much the exact opposite of progressive.

The problem with wankers like Harris, is that it's hard to tell whether they're noncey, or they're just being clever-clever "transgressive".

Personally, I'd burn Monkey Harris as a nonce, but that could be my irrational hatred of utter twats coming to the fore.
 
Almost no would-be working class activists would ever come across these people though. It's almost impossible to do so without searching for them on the web or coming to this thread. How many working class people are likely to do either?

If a working class movement is ever to re-emerge, it will do so without any reference to Laurie, Molly or any of the other fairly amusing and wholly harmless children at play featured here.

That's remarkably optimistic by your standards. . . ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom