chilango
Hypothetical Wanker
OK, let me rephrase - 58 pages suggests some posters here are giving her the kind of attention she craves
Who's benefitting most from this exchange?
OK, let me rephrase - 58 pages suggests some posters here are giving her the kind of attention she craves
She don't crave this.OK, let me rephrase - 58 pages suggests some posters here are giving her the kind of attention she craves
Who's benefitting most from this exchange?
The one going down month on month?well its not likely to the doing their cpm revenue any harm
no reason to stop though
well its not likely to the doing their cpm revenue any harm
no reason to stop though
The Indy?
As ever, wait. I'm right.Nah they have a billionaire owner who clearly pays any old writer 100k or more a year, they're rolling in it!
Dunno about anyone else, but I've not been visiting their site.
It's attention - all publicity is good publicity.58 pages of taking the piss. If she craves that, then she's more of a head banger than I first thought.
It's attention - all publicity is good publicity.
Everything is everything. There's no way out of you being right is there.she's a name. Hostility, piss-takes, derision, whatever - it all fuels that. She's grateful....
she's a name. Hostility, piss-takes, derision, whatever - it all fuels that. She's grateful....
Wowwould you be talking about Paul Gadd otherwise?
would you be talking about Paul Gadd otherwise?
would you be talking about Paul Gadd otherwise?
She don't crave this.
That is brilliant!
Bizarre misreading of and shit response to Gove's wet nonsense from the other day.
http://www.independent.co.uk/opinio...on-but-im-still-not-on-your-team-7737823.html
I'm surprised she didn't list her exam grades. And I bet that teacher took the form of a burning shrubbery.
After due reflection and cogitation...I was talking total bollocks here Point about Laurie still stands..would you be talking about Paul Gadd otherwise?