DotCommunist
So many particulars. So many questions.
Godspeed you, painscienceguy
Because it take a long time for them to die. It is not a quick death.Why would you want them to die when their pain can be exquisitely drawn-out?
Because it take a long time for them to die. It is not a quick death.
The Boats is the worst way to die i reckon. I think the Sumerians or some other ancient civilisation practised it.
You get tied between two boats and covered in honey, then the insects come and eat you.
My, that is bad.Fuck, it's worse than I remember:
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scaphism
I was the LIST!!!!!!Fair enough then!
(takes eqg's name off of "the list")
Fuck, it's worse than I remember:
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scaphism
A very alternative club.Sounds like a German club.
Privileged gentleman's club.A very alternative club.
I think those are very expensive.Privileged gentleman's club.
Fuck, it's worse than I remember:
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scaphism
History is the autobiography of a mad man.
They can't ban the NUJ by the way. They can only refuse to voluntarily recognise them, and it's now open to the NUJ to attempt the involuntary recognition route via the CAC.Quick question: was the New Statesman always anti-union, or is the current ban on the NUJ there relatively recent?
Bit weird what he's saying about the "anarchist movement" though. As far as I could see, the ones I'm aware of were hardly queuing up to support LP and some went out of their way to say so. Some of them actually on this thread. Plus, I'm still not convinced that Privilege Theory has been taken up wholesale by anarchist groups and AFEDs stance (for example) is far from clear. I wonder if Dave thinks all anarchists are like LP.
Ta, ld. That makes more sense now you explain it. It's not really how it comes across in that article though.he's only talking about 'certain sections' of the anarchist movement, not all of them
since leaving the IWCA he's been involved with things like WAG, ALARM, etc.. and has become much more supportive of anarchism in general
so it's self criticism from an involved point of view pretty much, not a general misconception of things as a result of distance from it (like penny does!)
Good old Laura, the Labour-supporting anarchist!Bit weird what he's saying about the "anarchist movement" though. As far as I could see, the ones I'm aware of were hardly queuing up to support LP and some went out of their way to say so. Some of them actually on this thread. Plus, I'm still not convinced that Privilege Theory has been taken up wholesale by anarchist groups and AFEDs stance (for example) is far from clear. I wonder if Dave thinks all anarchists are like LP.
Didn't butchers say she's a bloody LibDem now or summat? in any event, she's clearly not read the bit about electoral politicsGood old Laura, the Labour-supporting anarchist!
Didn't butchers say she's a bloody LibDem now or summat? in any event, she's clearly not read the bit about electoral politics
They can't ban the NUJ by the way. They can only refuse to voluntarily recognise them, and it's now open to the NUJ to attempt the involuntary recognition route via the CAC.
Good old Laura, the Labour-supporting anarchist!
She's all over the place! In the run-up to the election she was Lib-Dem, only to mysteriously swap over to Labour and claim that she'd always supported Labour when it became obvious the Yellow Tories were going to go into coalition with the Blue Tories, not the red Tories.
No idea tbh. But if the NUJ tried the CAC route before when the last row took place, they have to wait 3 years before making another application. I did skim-trawl back through all the CAC decisions back to approx 2008 but an application from the NUJ wasn't immediately apparent, so maybe they've never tried to force the issue.So the NS was unionised in the past, then?
lots of anarchists have at least voted Labour at various times though, which is support of a kind.
Laura did vote Libdem in 2010 but is clearly back in the Labour fold now.