littlebabyjesus
one of Maxwell's demons
No.all sex is about power to some degree, no
No.all sex is about power to some degree, no
all sex is about power to some degree
Good point, maybe they should of asked the men how much of a boner do they seriously believe they could maintain in the presence of screams, shouts, tears, punches, clawings, pleadings and seriously-not-happy-face (or even just cold immobile terror).
Read the paper, there's a good twat. They had no reason to not take the questions seriously. In fact, as course credits were involved as a "payment" for participation, the encouragement would have been the exact opposite of what you claim. The data was also assessed using variables to allow for participants not taking the survey seriously.
You said 'how much of a boner do they seriously believe they could maintain in the presence of...(protest)..., thereby implying that few could manage it. Where did I say I believe that rape is always about power and never sex? I don't advocate that argument. If rape is about theft, what exactly has been stolen? Why do you also assume I might have a problem with consensual 'sexy power play'? I don't think there's anything wrong with that either.
the bit that is the key point to this study is that there is a subset of men who could see themselves behaving in a way that would legally make them rapists, who didn't see themselves as rapists. this was those who were prepared to use coercive measures to obtain a lack of resistance to them, something they could pretend was proper consent. that made them in their eyes not-rapists. because they see resistance as part of the game of man as chaser and woman as prey. she's supposed to say no at first, he's supposed to push to overcome that. not necessarily by pinning her down against her active resistance, but by creating a situation where she isn't actively resisting him.
Has anyone mentioned 2/3rds wouldn't, a much better spin - if only to let rapist third know they're knobs.
Yes I did imply that a minority of men could manage it, perhaps because I like to believe that most people aren't rapists. Fair enough for the rest of what you said. And rape being about theft means theft of sexual-access, theft of a persons choice, the theft of power...
Apparently the word 'rape' used to (chillingly) be described as a transgression of a father or husbands 'property'. I certainly don't mean that.
Oh of course not.... I'm sure you'd like to add for the public record that at no time did any juror actually discuss any trial they had been a juror on with anybody that had not been a juror on the same trial.
I'd
I also want to believe most people aren't rapists but this paedophile and rape chat makes me seriously worried. If one in three blokes is a rapist (and possibly a similar proportion of gay women, who knows, I have certainly come across women with a similar lack of respect for anyone's boundaries although not been raped by one) then how the hell are you supposed to tell as they don't all walk around with a sign on their head?
The idea that literally anyone you know could be a rapist makes me really scared. No wonder nobody wants to believe that it happens because it's so terrifying.
The idea that literally anyone you know could be a rapist makes me really scared. No wonder nobody wants to believe that it happens because it's so terrifying.
Vanishingly unlikely, compared with potential rapists.Literally anyone you know could be a paedophile serial killer too.
HTH HAND
Vanishingly unlikely, compared with potential rapists.
What is your point? It's rational for women to be cautious around strange men (and sometimes men they already know) because there is a high incidence in general of rapey behaviour. As for potential paedophiles, parents tend to be very cautious when entrusting a child to someone's care. The irony is that most rapes are by acquaintances and most paedophile attacks are familial.Still, literally anyone.
What is your point? It's rational for women to be cautious around strange men (and sometimes men they already know) because there is a high incidence in general of rapey behaviour. As for potential paedophiles, parents tend to be very cautious when entrusting a child to someone's care. The irony is that most rapes are by acquaintances and most paedophile attacks are familial.
Oh, I get it, you're a nice guy.
Go on, I'll bite. Are you talking statistics or something more subtle?
Vanishingly unlikely, compared with potential rapists.
True, but we can also say that potential rapists are vanishingly rare in comparison to common thieves. Comparing different types of criminal behaviour seldom yields any results worth bothering with.
What is your point? It's rational for women to be cautious around strange men (and sometimes men they already know) because there is a high incidence in general of rapey behaviour. As for potential paedophiles, parents tend to be very cautious when entrusting a child to someone's care. The irony is that most rapes are by acquaintances and most paedophile attacks are familial.
Edited to correct final sentence.
Potential rapists are incredibly common!
Personally I'd replace "most" with "a majority", because most implies almost all.
Because you're a coward.
A deluded coward.
More than likely, as I've less than a score left of my "three score and ten". Still, at least I can die knowing my life had value.
Tut tut, don't you think you're rather giving the game away with your fixation on my supposed "anger management issues"?
No you won't. As always, all you'll ever do or be good for is shit stirring.
I'm sure all women reading this will be very grateful to you for putting them right on their irrational fears.And thus we illustrate the Dunning-Kruger effect for the twelfth time today...