Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

A third of male university students say they would rape a woman if there no were no consequences

finally got to stop being distracted long enough to actually concentrate on the paper.

the important bit is that men who display high levels of 'benevolent sexism'/chauvinism/massively set ideas on gender roles are the men who are most likely to be in denial that they are rapists. because coerced/bullied/intoxicated consent is not actually getting someone to having sex when they don't really want to, ti's just overcoming a woman's natural aversion to sex because gender roles tell her she is supposed to be chased and he is supposed to be chaser.

Baby it's cold outside, basically?
 
That's rather the point.

ok, i'm studying attitudes of a different sort, either i design the study well enough so I get patterns that i can write about, or I don't. no pattern, no result, and not getting a pattern is a failure, i wouldn't get to say that not finding anything is also an interesting thing. all I can do at that point is look for other ways to find more information in the hope of finding patterns, or quit

Every day is grant application season...


and one day closer to REF assessment. that's Uk based, but most places will see similar, where they and their institute are given performance ratings.
 
ok, i'm studying attitudes of a different sort, either i design the study well enough so I get patterns that i can write about, or I don't. no pattern, no result, and not getting a pattern is a failure, i wouldn't get to say that not finding anything is also an interesting thing. all I can do at that point is look for other ways to find more information in the hope of finding patterns, or quit




and one day closer to REF assessment. that's Uk based, but most places will see similar, where they and their institute are given performance ratings.

So what is the empirical strategy?
 
Even allowing for all that (and I really don't want to diminish how fucked up the real-life situation is), I think it's still a jump to a magic situation with guaranteed lack of consequences. Unless you then murdered her, the woman you raped would know. That's a consequence right there. These are clearly leading questions, not that I'm saying it's ok to allow yourself to be led by them but it does strike me as a study designed to maximise a particular response.

If the woman were too drunk/unconscious to remember, and the man used a condom and no excessive force leaving marks, then she wouldn't know either. You could argue that that makes the rape less bad, in that she won't be traumatised by it, and that may have affected the results.

But it's also something that happens in the real world, women getting raped when too out of it to remember it. I mean, Ched Evans' victim didn't even know he'd raped her till DNA evidence showed it and then he admitted having sex with her and witnesses said they'd seen it - she only thought the other footballer had raped her, hence the DNA testing to begin with.

It's really not as bizarre a proposition as some are suggesting.
 
Ched Evans spent two and a half years in jail. That's a good counter-example, surely - even if she doesn't remember, there can still be consequences in the real world.
 
I think if you're really horrified by the study you're ascribing intent to these men, as in, yes I'd want to.

Whereas the rates of sexual assault are fairly high, so it might have been that 30% of men were actually honestly answering the question "can you envisage a situation where you might rape a women", and they were possibly answering honestly, given the general stats about rape.

Does that make sense?

As in, if 100 people were asked "would you ever hit a child (if you knew you would get away with it)", 30% might say yes, it's whether that means yes, I'd want to, or, yes I know I might.
 
I think if you're really horrified by the study you're ascribing intent to these men, as in, yes I'd want to.

Whereas the rates of sexual assault are fairly high, so it might have been that 30% of men were actually honestly answering the question "can you envisage a situation where you might rape a women", and they were possibly answering honestly, given the general stats about rape.

Does that make sense?

As in, if 100 people were asked "would you ever hit a child (if you knew you would get away with it)", 30% might say yes, it's whether that means yes, I'd want to, or, yes I know I might.
Strikes me that they're directing the men away from their real-life behaviour towards their fantasies by setting the questions in fantasy-land. So this study found that 30 per cent of the respondents would entertain rapey fantasies when prompted.

But I believe there are studies out there that have found that both men and women commonly entertain rapey fantasies. Is this showing any more than that?
 
Given that 2 women a week are killed by a current or former male partner, and every minute an incident of domestic violence is reported to the police, why is it so hard to believe that other offences against women are par for the course? In the real world, rape is not an exceptional crime carried out by a few disturbed individuals; it's a common, everyday occurrence. Unlike murder, robbing a bank and all the other hypothetical comparisons that have been made, most rapes are already carried out with total impunity.
 
Strikes me that they're directing the men away from their real-life behaviour towards their fantasies by setting the questions in fantasy-land. So this study found that 30 per cent of the respondents would entertain rapey fantasies when prompted.

But I believe there are studies out there that have found that both men and women commonly entertain rapey fantasies. Is this showing any more than that?

Good point, maybe they should of asked the men how much of a boner do they seriously believe they could maintain in the presence of screams, shouts, tears, punches, clawings, pleadings and seriously-not-happy-face (or even just cold immobile terror).
 
I'm genuinely shocked by this study (even if the sample size is very small at just 86). Really quite disturbing.

To be honest, I think the real story here is that they quite simply didn't take the survey seriously....I don't believe for one minute that someone who is harbouring thoughts of raping people would admit as much. Most rape cases involving students aren't going to be planned or premeditated, it's a case of them getting drunk / high and making awful decisions when presented with a person in vulnerable situation.
 
Given that 2 women a week are killed by a current or former male partner, and every minute an incident of domestic violence is reported to the police, why is it so hard to believe that other offences against women are par for the course? In the real world, rape is not an exceptional crime carried out by a few disturbed individuals; it's a common, everyday occurrence. Unlike murder, robbing a bank and all the other hypothetical comparisons that have been made, most rapes are already carried out with total impunity.
Just Aaecdotal, but when I did jury service there were two trials ongoing the week I was there, both were rape cases (including the one I was on). From speaking to people who were there for the second week, the week before there had been 3 trials, all of them rape cases. Bearing in mind how many go unreported it is pretty depressing.
 
Just Aaecdotal, but when I did jury service there were two trials ongoing the week I was there, both were rape cases (including the one I was on). From speaking to people who were there for the second week, the week before there had been 3 trials, all of them rape cases. Bearing in mind how many go unreported it is pretty depressing.
... I'm sure you'd like to add for the public record that at no time did any juror actually discuss any trial they had been a juror on with anybody that had not been a juror on the same trial.
 
To be honest, I think the real story here is that they quite simply didn't take the survey seriously....I don't believe for one minute that someone who is harbouring thoughts of raping people would admit as much. Most rape cases involving students aren't going to be planned or premeditated, it's a case of them getting drunk / high and making awful decisions when presented with a person in vulnerable situation.

Read the paper, there's a good twat. They had no reason to not take the questions seriously. In fact, as course credits were involved as a "payment" for participation, the encouragement would have been the exact opposite of what you claim. The data was also assessed using variables to allow for participants not taking the survey seriously.
 
Read the paper, there's a good twat. They had no reason to not take the questions seriously. In fact, as course credits were involved as a "payment" for participation, the encouragement would have been the exact opposite of what you claim. The data was also assessed using variables to allow for participants not taking the survey seriously.

I don't run around insulting people, that's why I'm in with a better chance of a shag than you are. I'll most probably live longer.

Have you thought about buying some stress balls to help with your anger management issues?

If you need anything, I'll always be here to help. {{{ ViolentPanda }}}
 
Ched Evans spent two and a half years in jail. That's a good counter-example, surely - even if she doesn't remember, there can still be consequences in the real world.

Not really. He was convicted because she suspected someone else had raped her (and her got off because they decided she wasn't drunk enough when the other footballer took her to bed). Otherwise she would never have known.

And that was part of the question, ISTM, in this study, because with no repercussions could certainly include the woman not remembering. Her remembering it would count as a repercussion for lots of men.
 
I don't run around insulting people...

Because you're a coward.

...that's why I'm in with a better chance of a shag than you are.

A deluded coward.

I'll most probably live longer.

More than likely, as I've less than a score left of my "three score and ten". Still, at least I can die knowing my life had value.

Have you thought about buying some stress balls to help with your anger management issues?

Tut tut, don't you think you're rather giving the game away with your fixation on my supposed "anger management issues"?

If you need anything, I'll always be here to help. {{{ ViolentPanda }}}

No you won't. As always, all you'll ever do or be good for is shit stirring.
 
Good point, maybe they should of asked the men how much of a boner do they seriously believe they could maintain in the presence of screams, shouts, tears, punches, clawings, pleadings and seriously-not-happy-face (or even just cold immobile terror).
Do you honestly think that all erections are the same?! Based on accounts from both victims and perpetrators of rape (even if no one is calling it that, which is common), what you're describing can happen and so the rape stops. In other cases it makes no difference; the man ignores all signs of objection or resistance that may be present, or even seems oblivious to it. In others, he becomes sexually aroused by it. Power has been known to turn people on.
 
Last edited:
Do you honestly think that all erections are the same?! Based on accounts from both victims and perpetrators of rape (even if no one is calling it that, which is common), what you're describing can happen and so the rape stops. In other cases it makes no difference; the man ignores all signs of objection or resistance that may be present, or even seems oblivious to it. In others, he becomes sexually aroused by it. Power has been known to turn on some people.

I proposed the question, doubtless there are some men out there that would say that they'd be encouraged by the distress and rage. Not sure what it is you think I was saying to be fair.

Re your last point about power, I know it's a common conception that rape isn't about sex but is about power. I disagree, all sex is about power to some degree, no- in my opinion rape is about theft. Who doesn't like a bit of power-play washing round the bedroom, nuthin wrong with it.
 
Back
Top Bottom