editor said:
Once 9/11 threads would have people arguing on all sides,
I'm afraid that's bollocks. Right from the beginning they were subjected to a different kind of attention. A long time ago now, just as soon as they got interesting, zap, they'd be gone. It was always in the middle of some interesting questions that would then never get the answer. Of course, the answer was not welcome, so off they'd be sent to the ether.
Then of course the whole lexicon of 'conspiraloonery' would appear, the classic method to rubbish the poster and effectively end debate. Many, including yourself would deign to speak for so many about the inconsiderate CTers who were shutting down 'real' debate.
I see now, years later, that you have unconsciously admitted what was always true: that there weren't ALL THESE CTers, to your mind the only one you can level that at is jazzz. To say that the threads were good at one point until jazzz ruined them is just bollocks. His voice is one of the best voices to be heard on any topic. It is vital that we get people speaking from non-mainstream angles. That's freedom of speech, and its underlying principle.
Of course, as it happens, jazzz's voice on matters 911 is far more mainstream than yours. But you'll never see that in a million years.
I recall setting up a 'different' thread on 911 (this word being your definition for what would not get binned), which asked all you lot to say what made you accept the official story. I wanted to shove all your questions back where they came from.
As soon as the going got tough, ya fled the kitchen and zapped it completely. It never even made the bin.
Blaming it all on jazzz is as bad as it gets. You're obsessed with his ability to speak his mind.
