Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact
  • Hi Guest,
    We have now moved the boards to the new server hardware.
    Search will be impaired while it re-indexes the posts.
    See the thread in the Feedback forum for updates and feedback.
    Lazy Llama

7/7 survivor begins 200-mile trek on prosthetic legs

Maybe if you understand the meaning of neither of those words, and have (on top of that) ignored the context of the sentence in which they were placed.
 
Maybe if you understand the meaning of neither of those words, and have (on top of that) ignored the context of the sentence in which they were placed.

You don't seem to grasping the difference in perception between what you think you're posting and how it's viewed by other, do you.

You seem to think, God knows why, that you're coming across as exciting and controversial and all that.

Judging by the majority of other posters on the this thread, almost everyone else thinks you're being offensive and sneering and self-deluded.
 
I don't know how anyone can claim that Das Uberprick is sneering - just look at these quotes, they are tact and sensitivity defined.

Wow, how 'heroic' - woman with no legs goes for a walk.

lol - I get accused of being insensitive... obviously the solution should be to 'hand out medals' to cripples for 'living through the night'.

oh, and this one in no way contradicts his other posts about what he is objecting to in this thread.

If the title of this thread was 'Victim of 7/7 bombings embarks on campaign to unite communities' then my response would have been 'good for her'.

which in no way contradicts

I'm also sceptical about the effects of a white woman victim of terrorism approaching Muslim communities across the country from the lofty high-ground of moral superiority.
 
You don't seem to grasping the difference in perception between what you think you're posting and how it's viewed by other, do you.

You seem to think, God knows why, that you're coming across as exciting and controversial and all that.

Judging by the majority of other posters on the this thread, almost everyone else thinks you're being offensive and sneering and self-deluded.

That's because we're all still immersed in the cesspit that is bourgeois ideology, from which DU has freed himself in one athletic Marxist bound.

Cheers - Louis MacNeice
 
That's because we're all still immersed in the cesspit that is bourgeois ideology, from which DU has freed himself in one athletic Marxist bound.

Cheers - Louis MacNeice

Ah, right, I forgot that, being an Anarchist, I was still bourgeois.

Maybe I should read every issue of Socialist Worker ever printed, then have my critical faculties removed, (re)join the SWP and I'll be on the only path to true liberation.

Yes, that'd be fun.
 
Which is exactly my point! And how many times have I seen/read this moral fable before?

The point is (and this may be just media spin) that this woman is now representing more than just the issue she purports, but also as an 'example' to others. Look at me, if even I can do this, then *you* have no excuse...

Guilt-tripping people into feeling lazy *is* *not* *a* *healthy* *way* of achieving your stated political goals - and infact, what this achieves in reality is to bind her cause to that of the establishment. What establishment figure wouldn't jump at the chance to be associated with Ms Hick's campaign? It gives *exactly* the kind of message they wish to push forward.

On another cynical level (and one which hasn't thus far been raised) I'm also sceptical about the effects of a white woman victim of terrorism approaching Muslim communities across the country from the lofty high-ground of moral superiority. 'I forgive you'. In political terms, what she is doing is throwing down the gauntlet - if 'I' can do it, so can you! - and in the same breath, she is also simplifying a tension which is infact intertwined with centuries of economic and Imperial dominance and everyday otherworldy brutality into some kind of personalistic love-fest. As though the the real tension is actually between different British communities, and not between Western foreign policy and a globally scapegoated minority.


I think you're wrong on many levels, but I also think that you and me talking about it, would be like a Chinese person and a Hungarian person, unable to speak one another's language, trying to discuss the merits of Proust.
 
belboid said:
I don't know how anyone can claim that Das Uberprick is sneering...

My response has been set against the tone of editors congratulatory waffle throughout - not intended as a personal attack against Ms Hick's in any other capacity than that it makes ed look dim (not hard). The second quote you gave, however, was actually directed towards a comment by Bakunin where he suggested lots of disabled deserved medals for simply living through the day. If all you've got is one edgy quote which was set against ed's hyperbole more than a personal attack against Hicksy, then you're not doing well.

wrt the last two quotes - I readily admit that my position on her tactics has been formed near the end of this discussion as opposed to at the beginning, where I was focussing only on the mindless doling out of 'hero' medals to all those involved. Which is why I made a point of mentioning the fact that the last quote was on another 'more cynical level', which 'hadn't thus far been raised'.
 
christ, you really are dumb, and unbelievably arrogant.

Go away and learn what 'hyperbole' and 'sneer' actually mean. Then accept you are talking shit. Then, fuck off. :)
 
My response has been set against the tone of editors congratulatory waffle throughout
"Congratulatory waffle." What a pompous prick you are.

:rolleyes:

I think she's a very brave and inspirational lady. That's my opinion.

Perhaps you're just jealous of the fact that unlike your all-mouth-and-no-trousers keyboard warrior rantings here, she's actually got off her arse to do something positive, honest and sincere and has captured the public imagination in the process.

How about you? What have you ever done?
 
You're gonna be waiting, 'cos I'm not going to answer a question which has frick all to do with my point and which would undermine my own point by me feeling I needed to answer.

Fucking dildos.
 
You're gonna be waiting, 'cos I'm not going to answer a question which has frick all to do with my point and which would undermine my own point by me feeling I needed to answer.
It has everything to do with your 'point.'

You've been criticising Gill Hicks's walk, describing it as "totally cliched" employing a "format" that is "too tried" and uninspirational for your sophisticated tastes, so it's entirely reasonable to ask what exciting, cutting edge effective methods you've personally used recently to get a positive message across.

So what have you got? More vacuous keyboard-warrior hot air and sanctimonious sneering?

Time to show up or shut up, squire.
 
It has everything to do with your 'point.'

You've been criticising Gill Hicks's walk, describing it as "totally cliched" employing a "format" that is "too tried" and uninspirational for your sophisticated tastes, so it's entirely reasonable to ask what exciting, cutting edge effective methods you've personally used recently to get a positive message across.

It has nothing to do with my point, as my point is people shouldn't have to frickin' compare their activities to those of disabled "heroes" to feel they still have a human worth, you pillock.
 
It has nothing to do with my point, as my point is people shouldn't have to frickin' compare their activities to those of disabled "heroes" to feel they still have a human worth, you pillock.
I'm not asking for a comparison: I'm trying to find out if you really are the empty, posturing, do-nothing keyboard warrior you appear to be.

You see, any clueless twat can criticise, belittle and sneer at others people's sincere efforts to make a positive change, but to actually get off your arse and do something takes guts.

So how about you? Are you just a sneering attention seeker?
 
Days later, the stalwarts were still feeding the troll

He's not a troll though; rather a silly teenager who says loads of funny things and the odd offensively stupid one. For DU to be a troll would take a degree of self awareness that they are nowhere near close to possessing.

Cheers - Louis MacNeice
 
You're gonna be waiting, 'cos I'm not going to answer a question which has frick all to do with my point and which would undermine my own point by me feeling I needed to answer.

Fucking dildos.

Undermine your 'point', not there is one, by showing you up as a do-nothing, you mean.

You can't answer the question so you're not going to would be nearer the truth.
 
Amongst other things, I think DU's problem is that hes trying to read this event entirely on a political level, which entirely misses the point. Trying to do good, and be positive is never going to be done in an innovative way never seen before, but theres actually a human element you need to acknowledge which unfortunately your sneering isnt helping you process.
 
All I'm doing is trying to respond and analyse the net effect of this project, and the manner in which it is presented. Call that 'political' if you will, can't help it's my immediate reaction.

Edit: proper pished, btw - distinct possibility I may discount all comments made in the next hour or so...

Don't know yet... Let's see
 
Back
Top Bottom