revol68
what, fucking what?
But don't you see the fallacy of your argument, your justification of immigration controls is that exist, you will offer no other justification as to why they should be desirable. Therefore our arguments as to why they are a hinderance can have no effect, because even if we show them as undesirable, that is not your justification of them.
The only way we could justify ourselves to you would be to abolish immigration controls, and yet if people assumed your position, we could never discredit immigration control as their justification is not based on any perceived consequence or even principle but on the basis of their existance.
Alas the status quo remains and all progress dies.
The only way we could justify ourselves to you would be to abolish immigration controls, and yet if people assumed your position, we could never discredit immigration control as their justification is not based on any perceived consequence or even principle but on the basis of their existance.
Alas the status quo remains and all progress dies.