not just previous, these crimes - phone theft plus shoplifting - triggered an unspent suspended sentence.
D'oh! Forgot that.
But one might infer previous to the previous from the suspended sentence... not just a fine...
not just previous, these crimes - phone theft plus shoplifting - triggered an unspent suspended sentence.
I don't want to overstate the case here - she wasn't sent to jail just for nicking a few cosmetics and a phone. These were the tipping point at the end of a process. But my question remains, and it's a general one not just for this case: does throwing her in jail do her or society any good? Was she a danger to the rest of us who needed to be locked up? Does locking her up for a bit make her less of a problem when she gets out? My answer to all these points is an emphatic 'no', and I know that many people working in prisons have the same answer, yet nothing is done, the wheels continue to turn.D'oh! Forgot that.
But one might infer previous to the previous from the suspended sentence... not just a fine...
Earlier in the thread, there was a link to some awful stats regarding trans suicides in prison.
It could be a coincidence that there have been a couple of suicides so soon after the issue became a media concern.
Or, it could be that, as per the stats in the earlier link, this is normal, these are regular occurrences. It's just that the media is now paying each death attention.
Here's a mind-blowing rights contradiction for the weekend:
A transgender woman, convicted of carrying out a rape when she was a man, has been remanded to a male prison.
Nope. There's no right answer to that.
Presumably the right(s) of other women prisoners not to be incarcerated with a convicted rapist?What is the contradiction of rights? Presumably one is her right to have her gender recognised? What is the other that's in conflict with that?
What is the contradiction of rights? Presumably one is her right to have her gender recognised? What is the other that's in conflict with that?
Presumably the right(s) of other women prisoners not to be incarcerated with a convicted rapist?
Presumably the right(s) of other women prisoners not to be incarcerated with a convicted rapist?
Presumably the right(s) of other women prisoners not to be incarcerated with a convicted rapist?
Do prisoners have the right to choose their fellow inmates?
In fine point of legal theory it may be arguable whether the woman he raped has a "right" to see that man suffer the consequences. Even if that man is now living as a woman.
I doubt it but, presumably, the prison service owes some duty of care to those that it incarcerates.Do prisoners have the right to choose their fellow inmates?
They most definitely have the right to life (if not a private life) and the right not to be assaulted or put in fear.
I doubt it but, presumably, the prison service owes some duty of care to those that it incarcerates.
True, but increased movement towards degendering might allow the state more flexibility in decisions about where to imprison trans-prisioners?They have a right to life, yes, and a right not to be assaulted. Those rights can be upheld without the need to imprison this woman alongside men. I'm not convinved they have a right not to be in fear. Many inmates fear fellow inmates.
True, but increased movement towards degendering might allow the state more flexibility in decisions about where to imprison trans-prisioners?
Me neither; I was merely making the point that they may be unforeseen consequences, that play into the hands of reactionary state agencies, from successful pressure to degender.I'm not really interested in allowing the state more flexibility in its incarceration decisions!
But, yes, you're right. Degendering in prisons (and elsewhere) would be a good thing. Ironically, it's arguable that trans people play a part in preventing that by consciously reinforcing gender stereotypes (albeit they are, at the same time, victims of them).
What if one of the female inmates ends up pregnant (consensually or otherwise)? Not really a good answer to this tbh.
The obvious answer is not putting men, especially rapists, in female prisons.What if one of the female inmates ends up pregnant (consensually or otherwise)? Not really a good answer to this tbh.
What if one of the female inmates ends up pregnant (consensually or otherwise)? Not really a good answer to this tbh.
But if this person raped someone and still has that part of the anatomy? The only thing i can think of is a special segregated wing.
Exactly. We're looking at a system of forced incarceration and trying to work out an equitable way to do it. There isn't one. There's no reason why there should be. In fact, it would be surprising if there were.Which is where I came in: there is probably no good answer to this one.