Please explain how my comments have degraded this thread.It's been a terrible - near shameful - last few pages. You've got nothing to say on this thread. Don't make it worse.
Please explain how my comments have degraded this thread.It's been a terrible - near shameful - last few pages. You've got nothing to say on this thread. Don't make it worse.
I don't intend to. But what is your point?don't pull away from the point.
I don't intend to. But what is your point?
You need to be more sympathetic to someone who has just monstered by the media.
Thanks for the heads up. Please explain the 'monstered by the media' bit
Yes, I feel more for her victims. Of course. Her victims are the victims after all.She assaulted someone, she ended up top Bbc story. Why? YOU came out with the I feel more for her victims than her safety in prison bollocks. Thats a nasty shit reactionary attitude.
Yes, I feel more for her victims. Of course. Her victims are the victims after all.
Nasty shit reactionary attitude? Please explain.She assaulted someone, she ended up top Bbc story. Why? YOU came out with the I feel more for her victims than her safety in prison bollocks. Thats a nasty shit reactionary attitude.
Go on then. Excuse her behaviour.Terrible post
Nasty shit reactionary attitude? Please explain.
there are a lot more intelligent people here but you are a fat swollen sweaty dick.
She pushed someone or perhaps even chinned someone who was harrassing her? Intimidating her or insulting her? To say she should be put in a men's prison is very reactionary given her circumstances. I don't want to take over the thread as there are a lot more intelligent people here but you are a fat swollen sweaty dick.
To be fair she was refused service at a bar for being too pissed so she headbutted the bar manager smashing his teeth out, a pretty despicable crime. She has eight previous convictions with a few for battery.She pushed someone or perhaps even chinned someone who was harrassing her? Intimidating her or insulting her?
I don't doubt there are more intelligent folks here, but there's no need to resort to such base insults :-(
I've got ...wow ... lots of things to say about this.
1. "She pushed someone or perhaps even chinned someone who was harrassing her?" :: she was doing the harassment and the chinning.
2. "Intimidating her or insulting her?" :: and the intimidating.
3. "To say she should be put in a men's prison is very reactionary given her circumstances" :: I don't think you'll find many people who think she belongs in a men's prison.
4. "I don't want to take over the thread as there are a lot more intelligent people here but you are a fat swollen sweaty dick." :: have, not are.
1 point is all it boils down to. A woman shouldn't be put in a men's prison. Unless you think people should be assaulted, punched or even raped at her 'majesties pleasure'.
umop apisdn said:FWIW, I reckon she should be sent to a women's prison ... but in all honesty I've got more sympathy with the various victims of her assaults than with whatever consequences she faces for assaulting them.
Gosh, Humberto mate ... I totally agree ....
As I said earlier:
Sorry mateThats the opposite of totally agreeing you pathetic wank.
Dismal shit.
It's been a terrible - near shameful - last few pages. You've got nothing to say on this thread. Don't make it worse.
No one, man or woman, should endure rape in prison.The Howard League reckons it's as least as bad here in the UK, though (and because) it's less acknowledged than in the US.
Ministers urged to investigate prison rape - The Howard League for Penal Reform
Way to generalise something into meaninglessness. When someone is in prison they are in the care of the state. By definition they have very little control over their circumstances. The state has a duty to look after them and bloody doesn't.Of course no one should be raped in prison.
As if it needs saying, no one should be raped outside of prison either.
I wasn't trying to sum up any kind of argument.Way to generalise something into meaninglessness. When someone is in prison they are in the care of the state. By definition they have very little control over their circumstances. The state has a duty to look after them and bloody doesn't.
... to an important general subject, which is admittedly off-topicI was trying to steer the conversation away from the particular person.
How does caring about Tara's fate in prison stop you from caring about the person/people she assaulted in the past?
You seem to be suggesting it's one or the other.
Do you have a finite amount of shits to give?
Good points well made. I'll answer shortly.So what's this 'care more about the prisoner than the victims' thing? I really don't understand what you're saying? She should serve her sentence in a women's prison, you agree. Where's the bit about not caring about her victims? What on earth does anything to do with where or how she serves out her punishment have to do with her victims being put in danger? I'm afraid I'm completely lost on why this is even a thing you're talking about.