Why do some feminists hate transgender people?

[Maurice Picarda]

Yeah, totally. She'll be the hardest fuck there whatever prison she's sent to, what with her conviction for common assault.

Huge amount of previous, magistrates don't imprison lightly.

 

[littlebabyjesus]

Anyway, she lost her appeal. It appears that they do have some flexibility in the system, which only makes the decision even more mystifying.

 

[umop apisdn]

Yeah, totally. She'll be the hardest fuck there whatever prison she's sent to, what with her conviction for common assault.

Convictions. Multiple.

 

[umop apisdn]

you've not seen prisoner cell block h, have you.

I have, although not recently. What point are you trying to make?

 

[Pickman's model]

Convictions. Multiple.

yes. what's your point?

 

[Maurice Picarda]

yes. what's your point?

That she's a danger to the public and the kind of person who it's sensible to lock up?

 

[Pickman's model]

I have, although not recently. What point are you trying to make?

there are people in prison with convictions for things like murder and gbh beside whom someone with convictions, even multiple ones, for assault and battery, will not appear anywhere near 'top dog'.

 

[Pickman's model]

That she's a danger to the public and the kind of person who it's sensible to lock up?

no, that's your point. i wondered what umop apisdn's point was.

 

[littlebabyjesus]

She has eight previous, including for battery, according to the BBC. That may well be disingenuous, however, if some or most of the other convictions are for, say, drug possession or some other non-violent thing.

 

[littlebabyjesus]

That she's a danger to the public and the kind of person who it's sensible to lock up?

Couple of months in jail. As we all know, this is the way to set someone on the straight and narrow.

 

[Pickman's model]

She has eight previous, including for battery, according to the BBC. That may well be disingenuous, however, if some or most of the other convictions are for, say, drug possession or some other non-violent thing.

and...

 

[littlebabyjesus]

and...

And, those attempting to make out that she's some kind of career crim or thug are very wide of the mark. The idea that her conviction history singles her out as someone who would be a danger to other prisoners is laughable.

 

[JimW]

and...

There's men in here done awful crimes
And others fallen on hard times.
But all of them are better than,
The stinking judge and the polis man.

 

[likesfish]

she sounds like a punchy drunk more of an irritant or annoyance to the public than a danger I for one feel so much safer this idiot is off the streets for 6 weeks.

don't think she deserves 6 weeks of extreme risk of rape though .
theres probably a spare cell at colly its unisex and very unlikely to be assaulted then nobody has the energy what with running or cleaning all the time so I've been told

 

[umop apisdn]

there are people in prison with convictions for things like murder and gbh beside whom someone with convictions, even multiple ones, for assault and battery, will not appear anywhere near 'top dog'.

And, those attempting to make out that she's some kind of career crim or thug are very wide of the mark. The idea that her conviction history singles her out as someone who would be a danger to other prisoners is laughable.

Not a danger to other prisoners. A danger to randoms whenever she decides to have a skinful

 

[Maurice Picarda]

There's men in here done awful crimes
And others fallen on hard times.
But all of them are better than,
The stinking judge and the polis man.

Nonsensical, whether you sing it or type it.

 

[littlebabyjesus]

Not a danger to other prisoners. A danger to randoms whenever she decides to have a skinful.

Pleaded guilty, was prepared to undergo court-ordered treatment.

But no, a couple of months in a man's prison is what she's got. Very likely to leave her with a whole new bunch of stuff to get drunk over. You think that's protecting the 'randoms'? Few people who actually work in prisons see them as anything other than a way of making bad or troubled people worse.

And right now, all I hear from the authorities is furious buck-flinging. Somehow, this is a decision for which no one person or body is responsible.

 

[JimW]

Nonsensical, whether you sing it or type it.

Thought you'd like that.

 

[umop apisdn]

Pleaded guilty, was prepared to undergo court-ordered treatment.

But no, a couple of months in a man's prison is what she's got. Very likely to leave her with a whole new bunch of stuff to get drunk over. You think that's protecting the 'randoms'? Few people who actually work in prisons see them as anything other than a way of making bad or troubled people worse.

She's being imprisoned as punishment for her crimes, not to protect the randoms. And I think it's totally wrong to send her to a man's prison.

 

[Pickman's model]

I think it's totally wrong to send her to a man's prison.

a fact the judiciary doubtless took into account when considering sentencing.

 

[Maurice Picarda]

Anyway, she's now in a women's prison, so all is fine.

 

[littlebabyjesus]

a fact the judiciary doubtless took into account when considering sentencing.

Nah, they just passed the buck.

The Recorder of Bristol, Llewelyn Sellick, said Hudson had a "worrying criminal record" which contained "numerous offences".

"It is for the prison service and not the court to establish where a sentence should be served," he added.

"Once the rockets are up, who cares where they come down?
That's not my department," says Wernher von Braun

 

[Maurice Picarda]

Nah, they just passed the buck.

To the prison service, which has now placed her in a women's nick. I know it must be distressing for you, but there isn't actually anything to rail against here.

 

[littlebabyjesus]

To the prison service, which has now placed her in a women's nick. I know it must be distressing for you, but there isn't actually anything to rail against here.

Good.

Great, in fact.

You think that would have happened if nobody had railed against it?????

 

[trashpony]

Anyway, she's now in a women's prison, so all is fine.

Let's hope they protect the other inmates from her '7 inch surprise hiding in her panties' that she talks about on her Adultwork profile then

 

[Maurice Picarda]

You think that would have happened if nobody had railed against it?????

Yes.

 

[Maurice Picarda]

Let's hope they protect the other inmates from her '7 inch surprise hiding in her panties' that she talks about on her Adultwork profile then

Her mother claimed that she had nothing more than a vestigial cock. Isn't Adultwork rather a caveat emptor environment?

 

[trashpony]

Her mother claimed that she had nothing more than a vestigial cock. Isn't Adultwork rather a caveat emptor environment?

Her punters seem to be quite happy with it. I'd imagine they know more about the current state of her cock than her mother does

 

[Pickman's model]

Nah, they just passed the buck.



"Once the rockets are up, who cares where they come down?
That's not my department," says Wernher von Braun

i was being sarcastic wheen i suggested they took umop apisdn's views into account.

 

[Maurice Picarda]

Her punters seem to be quite happy with it. I'd imagine they know more about the current state of her cock than her mother does

Hmm. She's still more likely to be at risk in a men's prison than she is likely to be a predatory rapist if held in a controlled environment in a women's one, though. I guess. I suspect that HMPS is better able to make a call on all this than the combined weight of the Internets and of prurient hacks, and that it has done so, and would have done so in their absence. There wouldn't have been anything like the coverage if she wasn't so photogenic.