Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Who will be the next Labour leader?

Who will replace Corbyn?


  • Total voters
    161
Concretely how is Nandy a move ‘to the right’?

I’ve watched two interviews with her now and don’t sense any sense of resiling from the key social democratic policy ideas.
She served in the pro-austerity shadow cabinet, she resigned from most left wing shadow cabinet in decades to sack Smiths tilt at the leadership. She's in no sense on the right of the party but belboid is right that she's very much from the same political space as Miliband.
 
Well what do you want from the (deputy) leader to the LP? What is the purpose of the leader of the LP and for who?
I suppose members would hope for someone capable of supporting the leadership as a clear, convincing advocate of the policy platform and all-round attack dog when necessary?
Not a figure of fun.
 
I suppose members would hope for someone capable of supporting the leadership as a clear, convincing advocate of the policy platform and all-round attack dog when necessary?
Not a figure of fun.
And your aims are the same aims as Labour members?
 
Yep, Corbyn showed no signs of any leadership since the 2015 GE.
I think is was one of the blogs posted here from the Isle of White CLP that described Corbyn acting much more like an Honourary Chairman of a worthy charity than as the Leader of a political party. Seems a fair description...
Posted on the Corbyn thread but relevant to point I'm making above. What do people want from a LP leader?

I don't think my interest, as a communist, are the same as either of the posters I've quoted.
 
Posted on the Corbyn thread but relevant to point I'm making above. What do people want from a LP leader?

I don't think my interest, as a communist, are the same as either of the posters I've quoted.

The leader of a party gets to choose, and stand by that choice. That is what they are paid for.
 
What do people want from a LP leader?.

Im not a member. I’m normally not even a supporter.

But, basically, if Labour don’t elect a leader who a) will develop and embed the key social democratic policy commitments and continue the step away from neo-liberal orthodoxy and b) finds a way to popularise these ideas in working class communities in towns and cities, north and south, among young and old then they are over.
 
What votes? When?

a1e3adb48d459154725dc9ecb92dfbbb.jpg
e685cc2511221734cceebc8545091cbd.jpg
 
There were also UKIP MEPs speaking at that event.

Look, I’m not a member. I don’t get a vote.

My comments about Nandy are based on the simple premise that seems to have a coherent narrative of what went wrong.

I guess I see the same strengths (as it were) and have the same concerns of LN as others on this thread. Also not a member.

I’m also aware of my own er vulnerabilities to the kind of ‘economically socialist, culturally conservative’ schtick (ie my hatred of a university radical types) that others might be happy to go along with.
 
The leader of a party gets to choose, and stand by that choice. That is what they are paid for.
Choose what? Everything. Nevermind the views of the membership?

brogdale see this is what I was trying to get at above. I think KK's view of leadership is not just wrong it's opposed to the principles of socialism.
It's the viewpoint that puts union bosses in charge of the decisions of industrial disputes rather than striking workers. It may or may not be a helpful viewpoint to the LP but it's a harmful one to workers.

The views of what makes a good leader for the LP are inseparable from what one views the purpose of the LP is.
 
She served in the pro-austerity shadow cabinet, she resigned from most left wing shadow cabinet in decades to sack Smiths tilt at the leadership. She's in no sense on the right of the party but belboid is right that she's very much from the same political space as Miliband.

That's definitely where the party will end up if they don't select another left wing leader isn't it. When Corbyn was elected the runner up wasn't the Blairite (what did she get - 5% of the vote or something), it was Andy Burnham. Pretty much a like for like Miliband replacement. That's where they'd be without Corbyn not the Blairite right.
 
That's definitely where the party will end up if they don't select another left wing leader isn't it. When Corbyn was elected the runner up wasn't the Blairite (what did she get - 5% of the vote or something), it was Andy Burnham. Pretty much a like for like Miliband replacement. That's where they'd be without Corbyn not the Blairite right.

With a left wing memebership wouldn’t it be difficult to ditch an established left wing party platform?
 
Choose what? Everything. Nevermind the views of the membership?

brogdale see this is what I was trying to get at above. I think KK's view of leadership is not just wrong it's opposed to the principles of socialism.
It's the viewpoint that puts union bosses in charge of the decisions of industrial disputes rather than striking workers. It may or may not be a helpful viewpoint to the LP but it's a harmful one to workers.

The views of what makes a good leader for the LP are inseparable from what one views the purpose of the LP is.

The leader of the party has to tell the membership when they are wrong - he's not just a cypher, he's a leader, a follower, sometimes a cypher, a persuader and an ambassador: his job is to persuade the electorate of the memberships views, as well as listen to the electorate and tell the membership when they are barking up the wrong tree.
 
Back
Top Bottom