I held my nose and went to the Daily Mail's comments section on this out of curiosity. The general consensus was that 'Boris' was right not to appear because it was all a bit argumentative.Didn’t watch it but would assume Johnson’s cowardice wouldn’t go down to well.
I didn't watch it, if i wanted to see an old bald man making promisies he couldnt keep i would have watched my dad's first two wedding videos.
Johnson has done another no show, this time a press gallery event. Given how bad this all makes him look, his team must be very worried about potential gaffes/chang. Won't make any difference of course, but what a shithouse.
The entire operation is planned.
As I said, it won't make any difference and yes, I can see the calculation he's making here. Same time, it doesn't look good if an incoming prime minister can't answer questions and debate. It's no great surprise that he's a superficial self interested wanker, but yeah, this is him being a superficial self interested wanker.Who does it look bad to? The tory electorate don't give a shit.
Yeah, if people think this looks bad it seems some of the lessons of Trump still haven't been learned (except by Johnson). The people he is appealing to like it when he is rude or contemptuous to the press, they like it when he is racist, they like it when he plays the idiot, they don't care about his record as mayor, they don't care about his diplomatic gaffes, they don't care that he lies, or that he got sacked from multiple jobs. It's not that none of this matters, it's that most of these things actively count in his favour. He's against the mythical liberal establishment, he's on 'our' side, he's confidently proud of 'Britishness' and therefore gives us some self-respect. All his lying and rudeness is just him being clever - on 'our' behalf. This is why he will probably win. Accusing him of things that his supporters already know, or pointing out his 'gaffes', is not going to help, just as it didn't help with Trump.Who does it look bad to? The tory electorate don't give a shit.
There was this interesting post from Jeremy Vine at the weekend, which suggests that an appearance of winging it is, in fact, planned.
you're having a laugh. the end game may be as you suggest but ALL the evidence is that johnson doesn't do plans, he does turn up on the night and hope it goes fine.
Yeah, if people think this looks bad it seems some of the lessons of Trump still haven't been learned (except by Johnson). The people he is appealing to like it when he is rude or contemptuous to the press, they like it when he is racist, they like it when he plays the idiot, they don't care about his record as mayor, they don't care about his diplomatic gaffes, they don't care that he lies, or that he got sacked from multiple jobs. It's not that none of this matters, it's that most of these things actively count in his favour. He's against the mythical liberal establishment, he's on 'our' side, he's confidently proud of 'Britishness' and therefore gives us some self-respect. All his lying and rudeness is just him being clever - on 'our' behalf. This is why he will probably win. Accusing him of things that his supporters already know, or pointing out his 'gaffes', is not going to help, just as it didn't help with Trump.
Thank god that stupid court case about him lying got dropped - it would have played right into his hands and absolutely guaranteed his victory. A right populist creates an 'us against them' that obscures class relations, and then invites you to join 'us' against some false version of 'the elite' that magically doesn't include the Johnsons and Farages. There's been a few people on here who every time Trump made some ever more idiotic or repulsive statement were saying 'This one surely will end him.' It never did. And another lie or 'gaffe' or racist comment from Johnson won't either. Pointing out that Johnson is on the side of the very rich and his program will lead to job losses and cuts to services is the work that needs to be done - not pointing out that he is a clown or a liar.
I agree with all of that. I've posted similar things about the lying court case and certainly agree with the point on (incorrect) expectations that the next outrage will 'surely' bring trump down. Having said that, even with the Brexit Party topping the polls at the moment, I'm not sure the UK is quite at that point. It's well on and people are expressing more and more contempt for politicians/politics, something the left should have been able to make more of. But I'm not convinced we are quite there in terms of there being a full on populist movement with it's own infrastructure. And Johnson himself doesn't quite fit the bill personality wise, despite some of the positioning you describe. Slippery though he is, he's not quite the maverick he thinks he is.Yeah, if people think this looks bad it seems some of the lessons of Trump still haven't been learned (except by Johnson). The people he is appealing to like it when he is rude or contemptuous to the press, they like it when he is racist, they like it when he plays the idiot, they don't care about his record as mayor, they don't care about his diplomatic gaffes, they don't care that he lies, or that he got sacked from multiple jobs. It's not that none of this matters, it's that most of these things actively count in his favour. He's against the mythical liberal establishment, he's on 'our' side, he's confidently proud of 'Britishness' and therefore gives us some self-respect. All his lying and rudeness is just him being clever - on 'our' behalf. This is why he will probably win. Accusing him of things that his supporters already know, or pointing out his 'gaffes', is not going to help, just as it didn't help with Trump.
Thank god that stupid court case about him lying got dropped - it would have played right into his hands and absolutely guaranteed his victory. A right populist creates an 'us against them' that obscures class relations, and then invites you to join 'us' against some false version of 'the elite' that magically doesn't include the Johnsons and Farages. There's been a few people on here who every time Trump made some ever more idiotic or repulsive statement were saying 'This one surely will end him.' It never did. And another lie or 'gaffe' or racist comment from Johnson won't either. Pointing out that Johnson is on the side of the very rich and his program will lead to job losses and cuts to services is the work that needs to be done - not pointing out that he is a clown or a liar.
He has a narrow strategy focused on becoming leader of the conservative party (and hence prime minister) right now - if it looks bad to anyone outside the conservative party, it'll be forgotten by the next time it actually matters, IE at an actual general election, when he'll employ a different strategy.As I said, it won't make any difference and yes, I can see the calculation he's making here. Same time, it doesn't look good if an incoming prime minister can't answer questions and debate. It's no great surprise that he's a superficial self interested wanker, but yeah, this is him being a superficial self interested wanker.
The only connection between the 2 would be if he refused to debate Corbyn and the other party leaders at the next election (if the Tories were in the lead), creating a bit of a narrative. Fwiw, I think he'd beat Corbyn one to one, but might dodge a debate with the other party leaders. You could imagine Nicola Sturgeon landing a couple of blows about his character.He has a narrow strategy focused on becoming leader of the conservative party (and hence prime minister) right now - if it looks bad to anyone outside the conservative party, it'll be forgotten by the next time it actually matters, IE at an actual general election, when he'll employ a different strategy.
and that he's one after dinner speech which he recycles.There was this interesting post from Jeremy Vine at the weekend, which suggests that an appearance of winging it is, in fact, planned.
That's fair enough tbf.and that he's one after dinner speech which he recycles.
yeh. but it undermines his reputation for quick thinking on his feet.That's fair enough tbf.
Brexit is growing into a full on populist movement. The newspapers in this country are so far right as standard that I think it crept up without people noticing. Brexit will drag on for years and that will allow the movement to grow. But you don't need much infrastructure to get one guy in a key position. You might just manage it with a bit of luck and the other candidates being crap. Then he can stir things up properly with his good ole honest racism and xenophobia.But I'm not convinced we are quite there in terms of there being a full on populist movement with it's own infrastructure.
He doesn't need to keep parliament together for a no-deal brexit. As people have begun to cotton onto, you can't vote away a deadline. Since a no-deal would create something close to a state of emergency, parliament would no doubt fall into line as the deadline approaches just to try to limit the damage. For the Tories that will mean imposing the kind of policies they always want to implement anyway.What I haven't heard from him is a strategy to keep the parliamentary party together for whatever variety of no deal/managed no deal/new deal he has to go for by October. At some point he's going to have to get 95% plus of his MPs + DUP going through the same lobby, which is his problem. He has to construct some kind of 'hard-ish brexit unity strategy', which may not exist. He will be in a stronger position than May in some ways, but the numbers are no better. If anything, the more he tacks to the right, the more he brings some of the Labour rebels such as Caroline Flint back in line.
I take the point that he will focus on that after becoming leader, but there's no sign he's got something up his sleeve other than hoping to win a further gen election. That ultimately might be what happens, he calls an election and drags the voters back from Farage.
Really hope his strategy is win, go to polls, get a Tory majority so can bin off DUP and whip a Tory deal through. What could go wrong with calling an electionWhat I haven't heard from him is a strategy to keep the parliamentary party together for whatever variety of no deal/managed no deal/new deal he has to go for by October. At some point he's going to have to get 95% plus of his MPs + DUP going through the same lobby, which is his problem. He has to construct some kind of 'hard-ish brexit unity strategy', which may not exist. He will be in a stronger position than May in some ways, but the numbers are no better. If anything, the more he tacks to the right, the more he brings some of the Labour rebels such as Caroline Flint back in line.
I take the point that he will focus on that after becoming leader, but there's no sign he's got something up his sleeve other than hoping to win a further gen election. That ultimately might be what happens, he calls an election and drags the voters back from Farage.