Joe Reilly
Well-Known Member
Because Trump really sees nothing wrong with smears from Russian actors he's heard tales of badly damaging an opponent he expected to lose to. And as I said above a lot voters probably agree with him. In this case it may be private sector actors but if you take a look at their background the very wealthy in Russia often do have a security background. Putin's favour and that is what enabled them to get stinking rich. If eagerly attending meetings with a lawyer connected to the very political Katsyv's dynasty and known for opposing the Magnitsky Act promising dirt on Clinton isn't soliciting I don't know what is. You can get done in national security cases for apparent intent alone. It's certainly sleazy and not a little stupid. They make it worse keeping on failing to disclose stuff. It's just Poppy Trump's MO to never to admit to anything. He's an Old Skool NYC "ratfuck" and will just dig an ever deeper hole.
At best the Trump team appears to have behaved in naive ways. The Russians are particularly toxic as there's a long list of recent offences (Crimea, East Aleppo, that airliner, backing the Iranians etc) and many senior GOP people still instinctively hate them. It would have been very stupid to collude with them or even let Russian actors create the appearance of that. I would not put it past some of the Z-list critters involved Trump has hired here. Trump clearly admires Putin. He fondly parrots RT talking points. Vastly wealthy alpha males like Putin appear to create suck up tendencies in him. I actually doubt Trump did collude but he's a chaotic manager and probably wouldn't even know what his people were at. What had to be foreseen was from day one after Trump winning Dem attack machinery was always going to be probing for weaknesses and smearing a GOP incumbent. This is what the GOP did with the Clintons and Obama. US politics isn't the the sort of milquetoast game where the "will of the people" is blandly accepted. For God's sake far more ludicrous attempts to smear the unusually proper Obama's legitimacy were what got Trump started in GOP politics.
Speaking of naive. The other logical lines of operation in the disinformation campaign do have Russian spook finger prints all over them. Again legal standards of proof are not needed in national security matters. Trump is the only senior US official now implausibly denying that the Russians meddled or rather still lamely insisting it might have been somebody else and that nobody know while US security folk say different. Tillerson in that meeting with Putin wasn't even prepared to wave through Russian denials just move on as his boss desperately wants to. The Russians have a lot of form for doing this in this in the past. The techniques used in the US election are exactly what they did elsewhere. The Americans have also meddled in foreign elections but that doesn't mean a US President should ignore the country he is meant to lead (and actually probably himself) being fucked with by an adversarial foreign power. Putin certainly would not bend over for that let alone reward such behaviour. Indeed this well constructed mess may be pay back for prior US beh
I get you don't like them. But if it was the case that it him that was approached by a third party then legally he can't be accused of soliciting as he didn't initiate the exchange. It is different from touting for information. It was offered to him. Now there may even be an element of entrapment in all of this, but if that turns out to be the case then Trump Jnr still is in the victim role.
Last edited: