Lo Siento.
Second As Farce
No, on the contrary, it's a pretty perfect statement of the ideology behind armies everywhere.Is there anything incorrect about that post in your opinion?
No, on the contrary, it's a pretty perfect statement of the ideology behind armies everywhere.Is there anything incorrect about that post in your opinion?
Armies? what about navies and air forces? anyhow despite that you believe our armed forces are political?No, on thr contrary, it's a pretty perfect statement of the ideology behind armies everywhere.
Armies? what about navies and air forces? anyhow despite that you believe our armed forces are political?
I take it the flood defence workers were out on strike that dayHere we see the British army oppresing the workers
"We are committed, in front of God, to the [redacted] people that we will protect [redacted], the [redacted] and their freedom."
Well that's a completely apolitical role then.it was our politicians who decided, the armed forces did what they were told.
As I already said, the UK armed forces serve the government which is elected by the people. Hopefully people will take electing a government seriously and vote as best they can.Well that's a completely apolitical role then.
...I don't really want to be too sarcastic here, but I'm not quite sure how else to respond.As I already said, the UK armed forces serve the government which is elected by the people. Hopefully people will take electing a government seriously and vote as best they can.
Well the armed forces are an arm of the state... Oh, here's a possibility: even if you did think that the orders that the military got via parliament were a reflection of some sort of will of the people, that would still be a very political role.
...when a department enforces political decisions to, say, sanction welfare recipients, how are they not playing a political role?Well the armed forces are an arm of the state.
Would you say the civil service is very political?
Well the armed forces are an arm of the state.
Would you say the civil service is very political?
In a very similar way, they do what they are told by their political masters....when a department enforces political decisions to, say, sanction welfare recipients, how are they not playing a political role?
When the police arrest political enemies of the state because those are the orders they're given, that's not a political role?
Being an arm of the state is by definition having a political role!In a very similar way, they do what they are told by their political masters.
I don't really see why you and others are so keen to establish that the armed forces are political, why for example it is not enough that they are simply an arm of the state?
And yet, when as likely will happen Milliband sweeps into No 10, the civil service, armed forces chiefs, NHS bosses etc will not be changed, they will simply serve the new master.Being an arm of the state is by definition having a political role!
And?And yet, when as likely will happen Milliband sweeps into No 10, the civil service, armed forces chiefs, NHS bosses etc will not be changed, they will simply serve the new master.
And nothing, made my point thanks.And?
So doing what different politicians tell you means it's not political?And yet, when as likely will happen Milliband sweeps into No 10, the civil service, armed forces chiefs, NHS bosses etc will not be changed, they will simply serve the new master.
convicted neo nazi laying poppies yesterday
http://www.hopenothate.org.uk/blog/insider/a-national-disgrace-4117
We seem both happy that: the UK armed forces are an arm of the UK state.Obviously doing what you're told to enforce political decisions except if you really don't want to means you're completely not part of the process.
So doing what different politicians tell you means it's not political?
Do you work in the public sector? If so, what do you think guides your work? The tooth fairy?
Virtually every aspect of life is 'political' in one way or another.
Perhaps you should take some comfort that a change of government does not mean a wholesale resignation/recruitment cycle. Do you really want an army divided along party political lines. One of the strengths of the army is its ability to serve all governments equally.
I have no problem with remembrance day but I don't like the way it is getting militarised. And I don't like the trends of for example Muslims being encouraged to wear poppy hijabs etc, it makes me feel really uncomfortable.
the big ramping up of the jingo this year is the commemorating the start of the war which is just sick, they didn't give a flying about the people who they sent to war then and they don't now. You're a spade or a tyre to these people- when you break they get a new one. You can fuck off and beg help for heroes for a few quid cos your no use in this mans army etc.
That and casting ww1 as a just necessary war, well thats a massive piece of revisionism. We hardly got the 'bosses war' narrative at school but we were at least told it was a stupid waste!
Declaring victory as the last men pull out of afghanistan tail between legs. We have always been at war with eurasia.
Just like when we one iraq 2 and trained a world beating army of locals there to defend freedom that worked
I don't work in the public sector, but I am saying that the armed forces are political as they go out and kill people on behalf of the state.Do you work in the public sector? If so, what do you think guides your work? The tooth fairy?
Virtually every aspect of life is 'political' in one way or another.
Perhaps you should take some comfort that a change of government does not mean a wholesale resignation/recruitment cycle. Do you really want an army divided along party political lines. One of the strengths of the army is its ability to serve all governments equally.