Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

what no annual poppy bunfight thread?

poppy?


  • Total voters
    120
It's a bit silly though isn't it? "Oh they're not political, they just do whatever a political body tells them. Unless they decide to take their own decisions but that only happens in bad countries like, er, Egypt. They're only the armed wing that supports the politics of whoever commands them and enforces their will, and control is crucial to any group that wants to take political power, nothing political about that."
 
army.jpg
Here we see the British army oppresing the workers:thumbs:
I take it the flood defence workers were out on strike that day
 

In Israel the remembeance day is massively politicised, iirc people have been attacked for not observing it
 
I also don't see what the army helping out with flood defences etc has to do with criticisms of it being wrong

Surely you can see that the army isn't 100% good all the time or 100% bad
 
I don't think Lo Siento. was saying the armed forces are bad, just that they are political.

It wasn't the armed forces that decided to invade the Faulklands, Afghanistan and Iraq, it was our politicians who decided, the armed forces did what they were told.
 
As I already said, the UK armed forces serve the government which is elected by the people. Hopefully people will take electing a government seriously and vote as best they can.
...I don't really want to be too sarcastic here, but I'm not quite sure how else to respond.

Oh, here's a possibility: even if you did think that the orders that the military got via parliament were a reflection of some sort of will of the people, that would still be a very political role.
 
.. Oh, here's a possibility: even if you did think that the orders that the military got via parliament were a reflection of some sort of will of the people, that would still be a very political role.
Well the armed forces are an arm of the state.
Would you say the civil service is very political?
 
Well the armed forces are an arm of the state.
Would you say the civil service is very political?
...when a department enforces political decisions to, say, sanction welfare recipients, how are they not playing a political role?

When the police arrest political enemies of the state because those are the orders they're given, that's not a political role?
 
...when a department enforces political decisions to, say, sanction welfare recipients, how are they not playing a political role?

When the police arrest political enemies of the state because those are the orders they're given, that's not a political role?
In a very similar way, they do what they are told by their political masters.

I don't really see why you and others are so keen to establish that the armed forces are political, why for example it is not enough that they are simply an arm of the state?
 
In a very similar way, they do what they are told by their political masters.

I don't really see why you and others are so keen to establish that the armed forces are political, why for example it is not enough that they are simply an arm of the state?
Being an arm of the state is by definition having a political role!
 
Being an arm of the state is by definition having a political role!
And yet, when as likely will happen Milliband sweeps into No 10, the civil service, armed forces chiefs, NHS bosses etc will not be changed, they will simply serve the new master.
 
Obviously doing what you're told to enforce political decisions except if you really don't want to means you're completely not part of the process.

Oh am I being sarcastic again?
 
Obviously doing what you're told to enforce political decisions except if you really don't want to means you're completely not part of the process.
We seem both happy that: the UK armed forces are an arm of the UK state.
In that endeavour they execute the decisions of whichever their political masters are at the time.
 
So doing what different politicians tell you means it's not political?

Do you work in the public sector? If so, what do you think guides your work? The tooth fairy? :D

Virtually every aspect of life is 'political' in one way or another.

Perhaps you should take some comfort that a change of government does not mean a wholesale resignation/recruitment cycle. Do you really want an army divided along party political lines. One of the strengths of the army is its ability to serve all governments equally.
 
Do you work in the public sector? If so, what do you think guides your work? The tooth fairy? :D

Virtually every aspect of life is 'political' in one way or another.

Perhaps you should take some comfort that a change of government does not mean a wholesale resignation/recruitment cycle. Do you really want an army divided along party political lines. One of the strengths of the army is its ability to serve all governments equally.

So does this mean that you're agreeing that the armed forces are political now? Or are you suggesting that all the other arms of the state are, but the forces are somehow different?
 
i doubt these days you get anything as retarded as the mutiny in ireland or people playing silly buggers as claimed in the 70s.
Genuine contempt for most politicions and senior officers after a complete failure to tell people the truth during the last two wars.
The aims were impossible.
 
I have no problem with remembrance day but I don't like the way it is getting militarised. And I don't like the trends of for example Muslims being encouraged to wear poppy hijabs etc, it makes me feel really uncomfortable.

Of course it militaristic, it is after all to remember the dead of the wars, the majority of which, in Britain, were soldiers, sailors and airmen. (And women).
 
the big ramping up of the jingo this year is the commemorating the start of the war which is just sick, they didn't give a flying about the people who they sent to war then and they don't now. You're a spade or a tyre to these people- when you break they get a new one. You can fuck off and beg help for heroes for a few quid cos your no use in this mans army etc.

That and casting ww1 as a just necessary war, well thats a massive piece of revisionism. We hardly got the 'bosses war' narrative at school but we were at least told it was a stupid waste!

Declaring victory as the last men pull out of afghanistan tail between legs. We have always been at war with eurasia.

Just like when we one iraq 2 and trained a world beating army of locals there to defend freedom :cool: that worked

it's not commemoration of the start of the war, it's it being billed as a fucking celebration.
 
Do you work in the public sector? If so, what do you think guides your work? The tooth fairy? :D

Virtually every aspect of life is 'political' in one way or another.

Perhaps you should take some comfort that a change of government does not mean a wholesale resignation/recruitment cycle. Do you really want an army divided along party political lines. One of the strengths of the army is its ability to serve all governments equally.
I don't work in the public sector, but I am saying that the armed forces are political as they go out and kill people on behalf of the state.
 
Back
Top Bottom