Weasel Straw strikes again (Pakistani men in Britain see white girls as "easy meat")
- Thread starter DrRingDing
- Start date
- Status
God your at it too now!
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
it gets worse
belboid
Exasperated, not angry.
I'd have thought you'd recognise such a classic quote from english literature. Should have used the quote marks I guess
pk
drink flounce rinse repeat
In the context, not isolated as you have presented it, a term of endearment that only a silly girl would take offence to... and only someone too scared to approach the topic would seize upon and leap up and down in a pathetic false display of outrage in order to divert away from the topic that dare not speak its name.
I suggest Mark Twain or Iceberg Slim for context, but no doubt you will state that I am the wrong skin colour to use such a word even in obvious jest, as it clearly was in the context.
it gets worse
I was refering to the cricket team.
pk
drink flounce rinse repeat
I'm glad you noticed.
Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
i recognised the 'fuck off you worthless hypocrite', a quote from a lovely and touching short story by graham greene.
What? Why are you speaking in code?
I wrote my comment in perfect English. Is that not your first language?
pk
drink flounce rinse repeat
So, no acknowledgement that you deliberately made it look as though I'd used that word then.
And still nothing on topic.
Typical fuckwit tactics.
The39thStep
Urban critical thinker
pk
drink flounce rinse repeat
No way in hell you're even capable of entertaining the notion that muslim pedophile gangs tend not to go for muslim children.
(the thread topic, if you recall)
Neither you or bellend or Floppy Snidey have done so yet, at any rate.
There is still hope, but not much.
Be interested to read eric jarvis' take on my interpretation of his statistics too.
Treacle Toes
Time
Oh and I suppose only an amazing, worldly, open, empathetic, big, strong, intellectual male such as your self would conclude that:
1. We can not read that there was no context for you calling posters on this thread niggers and you meant to insult with it. You were not endeared. Liar.
2. My pulling you up on it and asking you to explain your usage means that I am jumping up and down outraged as opposed to not letting you wriggle out of it.
3. That myself or anyone on this thread is in the least bit fooled by you song and dance, casually sexist, disengenuous and reactionary attempts to feign superiority whilst simultaneously and repeatedly refusing to engage on aspects of this discussion which have shown you to have an agenda/position that you are clearly uncomfortable exposing with conviction or in full.
Here I refer again to 'our White girls' and highlight the fact that although you have made this comment you lack the gumption or the courage to answer the questions asked of you or explain the comment itself.
...and if all of the above were not enough you are now attempting to give yourself context where their is none by alikening your usage here to be literary.
Ah yes and your claim to have been jesting has been noted too, plus you quick-step reverse tactic of claiming that I am in some way attacking you because of your skin colour, nothing new, and true to form with your type. You are a pompus disingenuos bigot.
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
Yup, "value-free", in academic terms, is an ideal rather than a reality: Worth striving for, but unobtainable.
pk
drink flounce rinse repeat
You've managed to use the word several times. Does that mean YOU are a racist?
Your pulling me up on it is in keeping with your hypersensitive reaction to the word, as if it were aimed at you. It wasn't.
No dear, quite clearly several people have seen for themselves the desperate smearing that has been employed to divert from the fact that they don't have the courage to discuss it. I'm perfectly comfortable with my position and have been more than honest about my own take on it all. It is YOUR agenda and YOUR determination to paint me as a racist, along with others, that is particularly telling. Nothing I say will steer you from your own entrenched opinions of me, but since I care little about what you think, owing to your previous ridiculous behaviour in similar matters, I do not feel that I am obliged to jusgify anythibg to you, and I will not allow you to contextualise what I have said when you have demonstrated such a need to see what is not there that you practically invent it. You are not alone in doing this.
See this is where you need to go back and actually read the thread - I qualified that last night, in the proper context.
...and if all of the above were not enough you are now attempting to give yourself context where their is none by alikening your usage here to be literary.
What??
Ah yes and your claim to have been jesting has been noted too, plus you quick-step reverse tactic of claiming that I am in some way attacking you because of your skin colour, nothing new, and true to form with your type. You are a pompus disingenuos bigot.
You might be right, I appear to have developed a bigoted attitude toward silly girls.
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
Pity you didn't make that clear earlier in your claims about Glass, then.
Glass didn't "pre-empt Marx in communist practice".
What we know about Glass (R4 did a very good biographical feature on him a couple of years back, btw. Doesn't look like it's available for iplayer yet, though) is that his "commune" was originally a shared possession of the three original male inhabitants of the island, and that Glass assumed ownership rights from the other two original male (and I'm emphasising that word deliberately) inhabitants when they left Tristan de Cunha. New (male) settlers arrived, and wives were purchased from another island. Glass acted as the patriarch of the settlement up until his death.
So, we have a few VERY salient points that reveal that what Glass practiced wasn't and couldn't have been communism, those being:
Women as subservient to men.
Himself as the unelected final arbiter of everything on the island.
Women treated as the property of the males.
Private property still existed.
Now, I'm sure you've read the Communist Manifesto, and I'm sure you'll admit (probably after a lot of blustering) that what Glass practiced wasn't even "primitive communism" such as the diggers wanted 150 years previously, let alone anything akin to Marx. It was a plain, old-fashioned "tribal" hierarchy.
I think that this thread has been irretrievably derailed.
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
Don't exaggerate.
I don't exaggerate your derailing tactics.
pk
drink flounce rinse repeat
Utter cop out. Why should I provide clarity on an irrelevant point I didn't even make?
So the old man had 1800's values. So sue him. Times have changed. His form of communism survives, Marx's pretty much died in 1990.
Proper Tidy
Arsed
Lol. How the fuck was it communism? You may as well say the Amish are communists.
pk
drink flounce rinse repeat
I think that this thread has been irretrievably derailed.
No, unless a moderator takes it away from the naughty kids and locks it (the intention of the likes of belboid and Proper Tidy).
pk
drink flounce rinse repeat
Another thread.
butchersapron
Bring back hanging
The historical ignorance of millennia old communism - thrown into peoples faces in 1816. Is there nothing this kid can do right? Why is lock and light on these boards?
belboid
Exasperated, not angry.
well, Engels did say that the Anabaptists (from whom the Amish sprung) were basically communists. A mere two hundred years befoe this Glass bloke
Perhaps the thread-starter can get us back on track by answering the often-posed question; what did he mean by this:
- Status
Similar threads
