Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Weasel Straw strikes again (Pakistani men in Britain see white girls as "easy meat")

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've already told you, I'm not interested in your silly hysteria.

aaah, dont we justy love pk's rank hypocrisy. big hard pk, resolute defender of womens rights (but only against 'pakis')

What a worthless human being he is.
 
'If it is it's Helen Brayley from UCL's Jill Dando Institute of Security and Crime Science,'

The thing is I'm increasingly wary of academic research these days, much of it now has an agenda or is funded directly by interested parties, look at the IPPR which is regulalry used by the Guardian in its ongoing support for multi-culturalism, the IPPR is a neo-liberal thinktank and uses evidence to support its agenda largely on grounds of economic utility, etc.

I'll say to you what I say to anyone who says what you've just said:

Don't rely on abstracts, don't rely on the published paper, check the references after you've read the paper. It's the quickest and easiest way to see whether someone has an agenda.
 
aaah, dont we justy love pk's rank hypocrisy. big hard pk, resolute defender of womens rights (but only against 'pakis')

What a worthless human being he is.

Why did you put the word 'pakis' in quotes?

Is that an attempt to make it look as if I have used that word myself in this thread?

You dishonest little cunt. Smear tactics are all you have.

Go one - quote one post from me where I have used that word. You won't be able to.

This is precisely the sort of shit I expected. Well done.
 
Dont blame me for how your brain fantasises cuntchops. Nor for your very limited ability with the use of english
 
Sorry I'll make it simpler for you - Scotland was a very religious place back then so it stands to reason Glass would have been one of the devout. Find your own evidence.

Sorry, but you're talking shite.
Parts of Scotland may very well have been "devout", but no more so than England, Wales and Ireland in the same period. They had exactly the same tensions between secularism and observance as were had elsewhere, the same falling away from religion of the newly-industrialised "lower orders", the same decrease in people working on the land (with the added impetus of the ongoing clearances).
 
Dont blame me for how your brain fantasises cuntchops. Nor for your very limited ability with the use of english

Don't put fucking quotes around words in a shitty attempt to attribute them to my posts, you deceitful little fuckball.
 
Sorry, but you're talking shite.
Parts of Scotland may very well have been "devout", but no more so than England, Wales and Ireland in the same period. They had exactly the same tensions between secularism and observance as were had elsewhere, the same falling away from religion of the newly-industrialised "lower orders", the same decrease in people working on the land (with the added impetus of the ongoing clearances).

Firstly what does this have to do with the topic, apart from the ongoing derail attempts, and secondly where did I say it was comparable or not to England??

Don't YOU start misquoting me as well VP!
 
Don't put fucking quotes around words in a shitty attempt to attribute them to my posts, you deceitful little fuckball.

they weren't quotes dear boy. Really, learn something about the english language, then you might stop making quite such an absolute cock of yourself.
 
they weren't quotes dear boy. Really, learn something about the english language, then you might stop making quite such an absolute cock of yourself.

Don't wriggle out of it, you tried to imply that I had used that word.

You now accept that I did not, yes?
 
Firstly what does this have to do with the topic, apart from the ongoing derail attempts...
You tell me. You're the one that brought it up originally!
and secondly where did I say it was comparable or not to England??
You didn't. I made the comparison to establish that your claim that "Scotland was a very religious place back then so it stands to reason Glass would have been one of the devout" was a load of bollocks. Scotland was no more and no less a "religious place" than anywhere else in the UK.

Don't YOU start misquoting me as well VP!

I haven't "misquoted" you, I directly quoted the point I replied to.

Catch a hold of yourself, sunshine. If you talk shite you get pulled up. You know the score.
 
I'll say to you what I say to anyone who says what you've just said:

Don't rely on abstracts, don't rely on the published paper, check the references after you've read the paper. It's the quickest and easiest way to see whether someone has an agenda.

Indeed. Also, while it is clearly important to know what agenda someone has, the fact they have that agenda doesn't mean their research is worthless. In reality, of course, everyone has some kind of agenda – otherwise they would not know how to decide what to research or how to research it.
 
You didn't. I made the comparison to establish that your claim that "Scotland was a very religious place back then so it stands to reason Glass would have been one of the devout" was a load of bollocks. Scotland was no more and no less a "religious place" than anywhere else in the UK.

Fucks sake, nowhere did I say it was MORE religious than anywhere else in the UK, only more religious back in early 19th century than today. On a side point with no relation to the thread topic.

What Glass's religion had to do with the fact that he pre-empted Marx in communist practice is also a bit of a mystery to me, but there we are.
 
fuck off dickwad, dont blame me for you ignorance. Go and look after "our white children"

So you don't even have the integrity to concede that I did not use that word, instead you're just happy to apply a smear and wriggle out of it when caught. Fuck you and your "debating" tactics.
 
So you don't even have the integrity to concede that I did not use that word, instead you're just happy to apply a smear and wriggle out of it when caught. Fuck you and your "debating" tactics.

He obviously put it in quotes to avoid it looking like he was being a racist cunt himself, to clear any confusion. However, I don't see why you're so uppity about it, being happy to throw 'nigger' and 'our white...' phrases about. You haven't got any moral high ground you sewer rat, so stop trying to claim it.
 
sorry, you talking about integrity?? oh the irony. fuck off back under your rock

Why can't you be a man and accept that I did not use the word your post appeared to attribute to me?

Is it that difficult? You think I wouldn't do that if it were the other way around?
 
Just another transparent attempt to divert the issue because vocalising an opinion would again show her to be a hypocrite.

:hmm:

I don't have a specific argument per se...

....our white children....

:hmm:

... I'm just stunned at the reluctance of any of the usual self declared opposers of tyranny and sexism to touch this issue with a bargepole, eric jarvis being a notable exception...

:hmm:

Fact is, I think you're a silly little girl and I can't be bothered to argue with you on any point.

I refuse to have my words contexualised by her silly OTT hysteria and deliberately warped.


:rolleyes:

So you don't even have the integrity to concede that I did not use that word, instead you're just happy to apply a smear and wriggle out of it when caught. Fuck you and your "debating" tactics.

:facepalm:
 
Why can't you be a man and accept that I did not use the word your post appeared to attribute to me?

Are you less of a 'man' because you refuse to explain what you meant when you called people 'niggers' earlier in the thread and why, even though you used it as an insult, you meant no malice?
 
Are you less of a 'man' because you refuse to explain what you meant when you called people 'niggers' earlier in the thread and why, even though you used it as an insult, you meant no malice?

He also called people 'pakis' too ;)
 
No, he put it in quotes to make it appear that I had said it.

You clearly approve of such wanker tactics.

Did he really? Because "pakis" is putting it in QUOTES. 'pakis' is emphasising it as different from the rest of the sentence. Therefore, you're a reactionary cunt with no weight to his main argument, so drags it off on a tiny little point. Classic right-wing tactic. Now get back to frothing about "pakis".
 
Why can't you be a man and accept that I did not use the word your post appeared to attribute to me?

Is it that difficult? You think I wouldn't do that if it were the other way around?

Fuck off you worthless hypocrite. You carry on thcreaming and thrceaming and thcreaming until you're thick tho
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom