Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Weasel Straw strikes again (Pakistani men in Britain see white girls as "easy meat")

Status
Not open for further replies.
pk said:
Sorry I'll make it simpler for you - Scotland was a very religious place back then so it stands to reason Glass would have been one of the devout. Find your own evidence.
Click to expand...

you may think it stands to reason but it's a fucking stupid assumption. fucking sixteenth century italy was supposed to be a rather religious place, but if you look at machiavelli's views on religion, you'll find they weren't devout or those of much of a believer. can you produce evidence to substantiate your assertion about glass's religious views?

rather than saying "nineteenth century scotland was a very religious place" you might at least try to imbue your post with meaning. can you produce evidence that all of scotland for all of the nineteenth century was a very religious place? i think not.
 
pk said:
Sorry I'll make it simpler for you - Scotland was a very religious place back then so it stands to reason Glass would have been one of the devout. Find your own evidence.
Click to expand...

if you can't produce evidence to support your assertion, your assertion falls
 
Proper Tidy said:
Come on, you were claiming he was the original Marx a few pages back
Click to expand...

Well, he had the communist theory down pat when Marx was still shitting in whatever passed for nappies in early 19th century Prussia... what does his being a "bible-basher" have to do with anything?
 
pk;11432783[B said:
]It's like arguing with the fash over their utter refusal to acknowledge the six million that perished in the holocaust.

No amount of logic and evidence is enough, silly people will just resort to smear tactics, anything, rather than address the issue.[/B]

And the so-called big guns remain silent on the issue for fear of compromising their carefully constructed facade of right-wing bullshit...
Click to expand...

Yes, I hear you, that's infuriating, so please, answer the questions you have been asked, namely:

pk said:
I can say this without any hint of irony whatsoever - if there really is any one of you left wing, left behind, left shorty lefties reading this thread thinking that the sexist Pakistani muslim culture had absolutely no role to play in what looks like a long-ignored problem, then y'all are some seriously fucked up niggers.
Click to expand...

What's a 'nigger' pk?
I would like to work out if I am one.


And everything from the right wing these days is... well - the only people convicted of this crime that were not from the Pakistani community were white.

At least two of the three are apparently BNP members, in the same gang as these muslim men, sharing in harmony like ebony and ivory, raping our white children after plying them with vodka and cocaine.
Click to expand...
Our White children? Are the 'other' children that were raped yours' and ours' too?

Are White paedophiles, which make up the majority of convicted child sex offenders under your scrutiny too? If Pakistani men do it because of Islam, why are White men doing it?
 
Nice try Pk, you big, straping, intelligent, important, powerful man....now, show the courage of your convictions and answer the questions. :)


embroiled in your silly hysteria.
Click to expand...
Wow...that is actually quite funny TBH, given your stance and assertions on this thread. :D

 
Rutita1 said:
I asked you about your usage! Please answer. :)
Click to expand...

I've already told you, I'm not interested in your silly hysteria. You've got form in this area, as seen in the thread link 4 posts up, and you are just looking to derail the thread just like the Chuckle Brothers are.

If you can't see the context for yourself then you're just silly, and I'm not playing your silly games. :)
 
pk said:
I've already told you, I'm not interested in your silly hysteria. You've got form in this area, as seen in the thread link 4 posts up, and you are just looking to derail the thread just like the Chuckle Brothers are.
Click to expand...

I have form? Physician heal thyself!!! :)

Answer the questions please. I am not derailing, I am asking you to qualify some of the things you have said on this thread.

If you are not prepared to do that because you actually don't have the courage of your convictions, fine...but don't try passing the buck :D

If you can't see the context for yourself then you're just silly, and I'm not playing your silly games. :)
Click to expand...

Gutted, seriously! :(

 
Rutita1 said:
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/chickenshit
Click to expand...

No, that's just too easy. Fact is, I think you're a silly little girl and I can't be bothered to argue with you on any point.

Anyone with any common sense reading my posts will know there was no malice intended in that word, you just want to climb once again on that high horse you keep parading around.

If you're too silly to figure out the context, then nothing I say will be able to divert you from your preconceived silly ideas, and it'll just derail the thread.
 
pk said:
Well, he had the communist theory down pat when Marx was still shitting in whatever passed for nappies in early 19th century Prussia... what does his being a "bible-basher" have to do with anything?
Click to expand...

yes, and i've asked you what his views were on all previous history. i await an answer with interest.
 
_angel_ said:
PKs posts are a master class in how to blow up your own argument.
Click to expand...

I don't have a specific argument per se... I'm just stunned at the reluctance of any of the usual self declared opposers of tyranny and sexism to touch this issue with a bargepole, eric jarvis being a notable exception...
 
pk said:
Fact is, I think you're a silly little girl and I can't be bothered to argue with you on any point.
Click to expand...

I'll just quote that for future reference.

pk, as a great man on here once said, 'it's time to take a ride on de chill bus'.
 
pk said:
No, that's just too easy. Fact is, I think you're a silly little girl and I can't be bothered to argue with you on any point.

Anyone with any common sense reading my posts will know there was no malice intended in that word, you just want to climb once again on that high horse you keep parading around.
Click to expand...

Equally pk, the fact is I think you are a bigot, but the worst kind.

1. One that has no courage, one that refuses to engage on points that will expose his true feelings. One that hides behind 'logic' and feigns intellect.

2. One that calls people 'niggers' and then shouts 'context' and says 'I meant no malice' to avoid explaining what makes someone a nigger. There was no context for you calling anyone a nigger on this thread afterall, you say you meant no malice yet you were clearly trying to insult people.

3. One that in the context of this discussion has used the phrase 'our White children' yet refuses to answer these questions:

Our White children? Are the 'other' children that were raped yours' and ours' too?

Are White paedophiles, which make up the majority of convicted child sex offenders under your scrutiny too? If Pakistani men do it because of Islam, why are White men doing it?

Why won't you answer them? Clearly because your answers will expose the value you place on children of one particular ethncity above others, oh just like you are claiming the rapists do/did in the context of the OP.

Yeah, yeah, I know you are not a rapist though, which makes it alright because you are not as bad as them! Well done big pat on the back!


If you're too silly to figure out the context,...
Click to expand...

4. One that defers to casual sexism and disengenous claims of 'context' because you are too chicken shit to say what you really mean.

...then nothing I say will be able to divert you from your preconceived silly ideas, and it'll just derail the thread.
Click to expand...

5. One that lacks the self awareness to question his own preconceived ideas, or have them questioned by others, yet uses such claims in an attempt to undermine the valid points that other posters are making.

pk said:
Why? Because you can't face talking about this stuff?
Click to expand...

:D Oh the irony! You have been repeatedly engaged on the points you have made but you have set boundaries about what YOU will or won't talk about because to do so dilutes your arguments, and exposes your own agenda/position. An agenda/position which you seem to be uncomfortable exposing fully, with conviction.

Yet, despite all that I am a 'silly little girl'. :)

Like I said, chicken shit.
 
pk said:
I don't have a specific argument per se... I'm just stunned at the reluctance of any of the usual self declared opposers of tyranny and sexism to touch this issue with a bargepole, eric jarvis being a notable exception...
Click to expand...

The problem is you don't exactly help yourself combating sexism by repeatedly calling Rutita a 'silly little girl' etc.
 
_angel_ said:
The problem is you don't exactly help yourself combating sexism by repeatedly calling Rutita a 'silly little girl' etc.
Click to expand...

If she'd read my posts she'd see what I meant, but I refuse to have my words contexualised by her silly OTT hysteria and deliberately warped. She can think what the fuck she likes about what I have to say, it's not as if anything she's assumed has anything to do with the thread topic.

Just another transparent attempt to divert the issue because vocalising an opinion would again show her to be a hypocrite.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

ElizabethofYork
Men’s violence against women and girls is a national emergency
34 35 36 37 38
Replies
1K
Views
44K
The39thStep
The39thStep
Nigel
First Sikh Court To Be Established In Britain: London
Replies
15
Views
741
tonysingh
tonysingh
O
Is anyone worried about the future of Britain's culture?
6 7 8 9 10
Replies
275
Views
9K
Funky_monks
F
brogdale
Prime Minister Starmer dressed as...
Replies
29
Views
1K
Karl Masks
K
Wilf
Things you'd like to see over the next 6 weeks
Replies
24
Views
894
Pickman's model
Pickman's model
Back
Top Bottom