Weasel Straw strikes again (Pakistani men in Britain see white girls as "easy meat")

[ernestolynch]

Spycam

 

[London_Calling]

armchair 'activist'

 

[Crispy]

Spycam

right on cue

 

[_angel_]

Borrowing tactics from swarthy ffs

racism

 

[ernestolynch]

Asian

 

[pk]

The reason for dismissing the finding is that it refers to only 41 rapes over three years that are given a separate definition that isn't explained. It's a tiny fraction of the rapes in Oslo. You've also posted reports showing over a hundred rapes in the city in a single year. This shows that even back in 1987 a single rape crisis centre in Oslo was dealing with over 50 violent rapes by strangers. So the figure of 41 assault rapes (or attack rapes) over three years is dubious at best.

OK, first off, I'll agree it is all a bit odd. And it's important to point out that these aren't my stats, these were given to NRK by Rohde, in the link that breaks them down over the three years to give the total of 41.
I have a theory that is by no means definitive that may explain the odd variation of figures.

In 1987 specialized trauma centres to deal specifically with rape attacks were not found as commonly as they are today, so it might, and I stress MIGHT be the case that many of the admissions were as a result of referrals from outside Oslo. Hence the larger number. As the stats show, many of these crimes occur in the north of the country, it may be that specialist treatment and counselling would have taken place after the event, in Oslo's crisis centre. So naturally the stats you have for admissions may not necessarily mean all took place in Oslo itself. I can't readily check national stats now as I'm posting from a phone, but 50 seems a very high number for one city in a year, one would have to compare those with similar Scandanavian cities of comparable size and population.

I want to see some reason why that particular set of rapes are different from all the others. Failing that I can't help but wonder if the actual reason they are separated out is that they are the ones commited by immigrants. Because they certainly aren't the grand total of violent rapes by strangers in Oslo over those three years, or all the other statistics are faked.

The criteria for "assault rape" was defined by Rohde in the NRK link I quoted. I think your certainty might be a little premature given what I have just posted above. Another factor is the percentage of assault rapes that were subsequently investigated, after all, the police stats are only based upon attacks that were given a crime number, not the total which may include those where the victim refused to persue with the police. I think that's a fair assessment of the data. Correct me if I'm wrong though, it's been known.

Now it could be that this one particular statistic is correct and every other statistic published about crime in Norway has, for some reason, been altered. I'd want to see a pretty fucking convincing explanation before believing that though.

Well, as I pointed out, the criteria of the data you have found does not match the data provided by the Oslo police.
If there were definitive 1987 stats that counted only victims attacked in Oslo, as opposed to being referred to what may have been the only crisis centre equipped to handle such an evil crime in Norway. More speculation from me, yes, but it's hardly a huge leap of logic.

You have also studiously avoided any attempt to counter the point that the rate of rapes in the North of Norway, where there is almost no immigration, is higher than the rate in Oslo.

Well, I have to take exception to the notion that I have deliberately avoided it, but it makes no difference to Rohde's statistics.
If I were to speculate I'd say the reason the figures in Finnmark are so high may be to do with the tourism, aren't all the ice hotels and vodka bars up there for the tourists? Not sure on that, needs more research, but the fact that the figures are higher than those in Oslo don't invalidate Rohde's claims.

And that's my final post on the subject. From here on any comment you make claiming that your opponents have refused to discuss it, or have failed to post any evidence, simply makes it clear that you are an outright liar.

On this point, you are indeed correct. You have very diligently researched and countered as best you can the figures from Rohde.
The opponents I referred to were of course Proper Tidy, Belboid and a few other no-marks. But it was ungracious of me not to acknowledge the time and effort you have put in in looking closer at these alarming claims. Believe me, I would prefer to see them proven wrong and if evidence that the cop was lying emerged, press for a more public investigation. Sadly, it seems unlikely that Rohde would have made such claims without concrete evidence as to their validity.

Hope that clears that up. Hope you can ignore the infantile bleatings of "racist" and see where I'm really coming from on this.
Oh and I'm sober today. Friday night was a different matter...

 

[Proper Tidy]

"Our white children". I'd give up drinking.

 

[pk]

"Our white children". I'd give up drinking.

You of course are far too thick to work out that the context in which that was said was directly aimed at the right wing boneheads that were apparently cheering me on. But since you have contributed nothing of any conclusive substance to this debate, your only means of getting attention is to misquote people out of context and snipe from the sidelines like a small and inconsequential rodent.

Read into my posts whatever you like, you're clearly an idiot incapable of even voicing a proper argument or an intelligent opinion.

 

[belboid]

Hope that clears that up. Hope you can ignore the infantile bleatings of "racist" and see where I'm really coming from on this.

the fact that you are a backtracking weasel doesn't make you any less of a weasel.

 

[pk]

the fact that you are a backtracking weasel doesn't make you any less of a weasel.

And you are another one. I've not backtracked an inch.

This shit is too serious for you and Proper Tidy, urban75's very own Chuckle Brothers, to trivialise with your pathetic sniping and wilful misquoting. You are clearly verboten from commenting on the issue at hand, and instead resort to cheap lazy smear tactics in order to try to make such a difficult topic disappear.

Shame it hasn't worked, eh?

 

[Proper Tidy]

You of course are far too thick to work out that the context in which that was said was directly aimed at the right wing boneheads that were apparently cheering me on.

No it wasn't.

And everything from the right wing these days is... well - the only people convicted of this crime that were not from the Pakistani community were white.

At least two of the three are apparently BNP members, in the same gang as these muslim men, sharing in harmony like ebony and ivory, raping our white children after plying them with vodka and cocaine. 11 years old you fucking scum.

If that's their definition of white power then perhaps Islam really is the future for the United Kingdom.

I know I'd sooner praise Allah than praise these examples of so-called Anglo Saxon purity.

BNP and EDL can fuck right off. UAF and SWP can fuck right off too. And the rest of the hypocrites.

You're all full of shit and you're helping nobody.

Grow the fuck up, we're not in Kansas any more, Toto.

The life of one child at risk of this shit is worth more than all your fucking principles, your religions, your shitty little political movements and your general failure at life put together.

And fuck you if you disagree.

 

[belboid]

Shame it hasn't worked, eh?

it did. Other than one or two right wing pricks, it's been very clearly pointed out how you have lied, distorted and been utterly disingenuous throughout.

You've rolled around in your own shit and have finally worked out how bad it smells.

 

[pk]

No it wasn't.

Clearly it was... the line "you fucking scum" is adequate proof of your inability to read.

I was talking directly to the BNP/EDL types and you fucking know it too.

Still, anything to avoid the topic, yet again...

 

[pk]

it did. Other than one or two right wing pricks, it's been very clearly pointed out how you have lied, distorted ....

Where? This is just empty smearing. Grow up and debate the issue - or it'll be clear to everyone that you have nothing but shit to fling. By admitting that you think your "tactic" actually worked you've merely confirmed what your role here really is.

 

[Proper Tidy]

So when talking to racists you feel its best to use racist language?

'Our'. We're kin.

 

[Pickman's model]

Where? This is just empty smearing. Grow up and debate the issue - or it'll be clear to everyone that you have nothing but shit to fling.

shit famously sticks.

 

[pk]

shit famously sticks.

Yeah coz you're really emerging from all this smelling of Dove soap ain't ya?

 

[Proper Tidy]

Our white doves

 

[Lock&Light]

shit famously sticks.

Even inside great sewers of the mind.

 

[Pickman's model]

Yeah coz you're really emerging from all this smelling of Dove soap ain't ya?

i do hope not. i can't abide the scent of dove.

 

[pk]

So when talking to racists you feel its best to use racist language?

'Our'. We're kin.

It's called 'paraphrasing'. Look it up you poor uneducated little fool.

How did you get on researching William Glass by the way?

Surprised to get a little history lesson from me were you?

I suppose you'll claim you knew it all along... and you've still failed to give me an example of a mainstream religion that in your view is more barbaric and unforgiving than islam.

Anyway, thread wrecking is no substitute for debate, and you've offered none of the latter in 70 pages.

Well done that twat.

 

[Pickman's model]

Even inside great sewers of the mind.

you're a bit lock tonight. nothing new, of course.

 

[Proper Tidy]

Is this William Glass who, according to you, not only invented Marxism but implemented it in the Democratic People's Republic of Scotland? Lol.

What were you paraphrasing?

 

[Pickman's model]

Is this Williams Glass who, according to you, not only invented Marxism but implemented it in the Democratic People's Republic of Scotland? Lol.

What were you paraphrasing?

he set up glass's, a firm of car valuers types: http://www.glassguide.co.uk/Content/?ContentID=54

 

[Proper Tidy]

he set up glass's, a firm of car valuers types: http://www.glassguide.co.uk/Content/?ContentID=54

Lol.

It was a commune pk, not knocking it but it's hardly fucking Marxism.

 

[pk]

Is this William Glass who, according to you, not only invented Marxism but implemented it in the Democratic People's Republic of Scotland? Lol.

More desperate lies and utterly pathetic attempts to misquote me. Do you really think everyone else is as retarded as you? Where did I say he implemented it in Scotland?

Go on - find my quote that says that. When you've done that come back and tell us all which of the world's current mainstream religions is more barbaric than islam. Go on, off you fuck.

 

[Pickman's model]

When you've done that come back and tell us all which of the world's current mainstream religions is more barbaric than islam. Go on, off you fuck.

you've moved the goalposts significantly since you first asked 'is islam the most barbarous religion' or words to that effect. back then you weren't asking about current or mainstream religions. is this because some authentically barbarous religions were mentioned, eg that of the aztecs?

 

[DrRingDing]

Christianity has arguably committed more acts of 'barbarism' than any other.

 

[Pickman's model]

Christianity has arguably committed more acts of 'barbarism' than any other.

yes. but any religion which hands out wine at services can't be all bad.

 

[pk]

Lol.

It was a commune pk, not knocking it but it's hardly fucking Marxism.

William Glass set up the rules for the people living on Tristan da Cunha.

They are still the basis of the Tristan da Cunha society of today.

The council decides how to spend the communal money earned from the crayfish exports, and ensures that a member of the family with the lowest income gets the next job to come up.

Everybody works for the common good. Everybody helps each other. Everything is shared; there is no private property.

This was three decades before Marxist theory was invented.

You learn something every day, eh?